skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 21, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Laborers International Union of North America, Eastern Region, ARB No. 03-114 (ARB Oct. 21, 2003)


U.S. Department of LaborAdministrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
DOL Seal

ARB CASE NO: 03-114
DATE: October 21, 2003

In the Matter of:

LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
NORTH AMERICA, EASTERN REGION,
and LABORERS LOCAL UNION 199

Dispute concerning the application of wage
rate determinations in General Decision
Numbers DE020002 and DE020005 applied
to laborers engaged in heavy and building
construction in the State of Delaware.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Appearances:

For Administrator, Wage and Hour Division:
    Mary J. Rieser, Esq., Douglas J. Davidson, Esq., Steven J. Mandel, Esq., Howard M. Radzely, Acting Solicitor of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.

For the Petitioner:
    Perry F. Goldlust, Esq., Joanne A. Shallcross, Esq., Aber, Goldlust, Baker & Over, Wilmington, Delaware

FINAL ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

   On July 9, 2003, the Administrative Review Board issued a notice of Appeal and Order Establishing Briefing Schedule in this case arising under the Davis Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C.A § 276a et seq. (West 2001). On July 28, 2003, the Wage and Hour Administrator filed a Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review Due to Lack of Finality and to Suspend the Briefing Schedule (Motion to Dismiss). In the Motion, the Administrator states that the petition for review filed by the Laborers International Union of North America and Laborers Local Union 199 (LIU) is premature and that the appeal should be dismissed "due to lack of finality, because the Administrator has not issued a final decision in response to Petitioner's Request for Reconsideration." Motion to Dismiss at 1.


[Page 2]

   On July 30, 2003, the Board issued an order directing LIU to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as premature. On August 6, 2003, LIU filed a Notice of Withdrawal Without Prejudice. We GRANT LIU's motion. LIU's petition for review is withdrawn and LIU retains the right to refile when the Administrator's decision becomes final.

   SO ORDERED.

      M. CYNTHIA DOUGLASS
      Chief Administrative Appeals Judge

      WAYNE C. BEYER
      Administrative Appeals Judge



Phone Numbers