As so construed, we APPROVE the terms of the agreement pertaining to Eash's STAA claim, ARB No. 06-142, 2000-STA-0047, and DISMISS the complaint with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
WAYNE C. BEYER
Administrative Appeals Judge
M. CYNTHIA DOUGLASS
Chief Administrative Appeals Judge
OLIVER TRANSUE
Administrative Appeals Judge
[ENDNOTES]
1 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 1997).
2 29 C.F.R. § 1978.111(d)(2) (2006).
3 Id.
4 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(2); Monroe v. Cumberland Transp. Corp., ARB No. 01-101, ALJ No. 00-STA-50 (ARB Sept. 26, 2001); Cook v. Shaffer Trucking Inc., ARB No. 01-051, ALJ No. 00-STA-17 (ARB May 30, 2001).
5 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(2).
6 Settlement Agreement para. 3.
7 Settlement Agreement at pg. 1.
8 Fish v. H & R Transfer, ARB No. 01-071, ALJ No. 00-STA-56, slip op. at 2 (ARB Apr. 30, 2003).
9 See Phillips v. Citizens' Ass'n for Sound Energy, 1991-ERA-25, slip op. at 2 (Sec'y Nov. 4, 1991).