Skip Navigation Minerals Management Service Minerals Management Service MMS Home pagesSearchMMS Topic IndexAbout MMSWhat’s NewOffshore Energy and Minerals Management United States Department of the Interior
TA&R Home PageTA&R International Home PagesTA&R Oil Spill Research HomeTA&R Research Projects HomeTA&R Workshops HomeTA&R Safety Home
Project Number 280
Date of Summary April 01, 1999
Subject Risk Assessment for Dry Tree Tieback Alternatives Study
Performing Activity Aker Engineering
Principal Investigator Riley G. Goldsmith
Contracting Agency Minerals Management Service
Estimated Completion Complete
Description This project evaluates the risk costs of three alternative design concepts for a deepwater "Dry Tree Tieback" well systems (well systems that extend the wellbore to a Christmas tree located on the production vessel (TLP, Spar)). The three design analyzed are

1) dual casing riser;

2) single casing riser; and

3) tubing riser.

Each riser system was analyzed at two water depths (4,000'and 6,000'), with two platform types (SPAR and TLP), and with both 6 and 12 wells tied into the platform. Phase I of this study (MMS did not participate) estimated costs for capital expenditure and operating expenditure for different dry tree riser configurations.
Progress Completed. This project evaluated the risk costs of three alternative design concepts for a deepwater "Dry Tree Tieback" well systems (well systems that extend the wellbore to a Christmas tree located on the production vessel (TLP, Spar)). The three design analyzed are

1) dual casing riser;

2) single casing riser; and

3) tubing riser.

Each riser system was analyzed at two water depths (4000'and 6000'), with two platform types (SPAR and TLP), and with both 6 and 12 wells tied into the platform. Phase I of this study (MMS did not participate) estimated costs for capital expenditure and operating expenditure for different dry tree riser configurations.

The study used fault tree analysis to determine the safety of the three riser designs. All of the scenarios mentioned above were evaluated. The study also looked at both normal producing operations and the safety of well interventions (i.e. workovers). Statistical failure records were used where available, but "engineering judgment " was often used to assign reliability values to components.

Results of the analysis can be summarized as follows: environment. This system benefits from the fact that dual independent barriers exist even without a mud column during well interventions. environment. ( This seemingly counter-intuitive result is explained by the fact that the tubing riser is removed and a separate workover riser is installed for well interventions). environment and the highest calculated total cost.
Reports This project is out of print, the reports may not be available for release, at this time.

 

Privacy | Disclaimers | Accessibility | Topic Index | FOIA

Last Updated: 07/23/2008, 08:02 AM