skip navigation links 
 
 Search Options 
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us blue spacer  
secondary page banner Return to NRC Home Page

Criticality Analysis of Assembly Misload in a PWR Burnup Credit Cask (NUREG/CR-6955)

On this page:

Download complete document

The following links on this page are to documents in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). See our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools page for more information. For successful viewing of PDF documents on our site please be sure to use the latest version of Adobe.


Publication Information

Manuscript Completed: May 2004
Date Published: January 2008

Prepared by
J.C. Wagner

Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Managed by UT-Batelle, LLC
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

D. Barto, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code B0009

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Availability Notice

Abstract

The Interim Staff Guidance on burnup credit (ISG-8) for spent fuel in storage and transportation casks, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Spent Fuel Project Office, recommends a burnup measurement for each assembly to confirm the reactor record and compliance with the assembly burnup value used for loading acceptance. This recommendation is intended to prevent unauthorized loading (misloading) of assemblies due to inaccuracies in reactor burnup records and/or improper assembly identification, thereby ensuring that the appropriate subcritical margin is maintained. This report presents a computational criticality safety analysis of the consequences of misloading fuel assemblies in a high-capacity cask that relies on burnup credit for criticality safety. The purpose of this report is to provide a quantitative understanding of the effects of fuel misloading events on safety margins. A wide variety of fuel-misloading configurations are investigated and results are provided for informational purposes. This report does not address the likelihood of occurrence for any of the misload configurations considered. For representative, qualified burnup-enrichment combinations, with and without fission products included, misloading two assemblies that are underburned by 75% results in an increase in keff of 0.025−0.045, while misloading four assemblies that are underburned by 50% also results in an increase in keff of 0.025−0.045. For the cask and conditions considered, a reduction in burnup of 20% in all assemblies results in an increase in keff of less than 0.035. Misloading a single fresh assembly with 3, 4, or 5 wt% 235U enrichment results in an increase in keff of ~0.02, 0.04, or 0.06, respectively. The report concludes with a summary of these and other important findings, as well as a discussion of relevant issues that should be considered when assessing the appropriate role of burnup measurements.

Generic Communication Containing No Information Collections:
This Generic Letter (Bulletin, RIS, etc.) does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).



Privacy Policy | Site Disclaimer
Friday, January 25, 2008