|
May/June
2002
Safer
Roads Thanks to ITS
by
Hui Wang, Patrick Hasson, and Mac Lister
Each
year, six million crashes occur on our nation's highways, killing
more than 41,000 people and injuring approximately 3.4 million others—at
a cost of more than $230 billion, according to the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration. Despite these distressing statistics,
driving has become safer in recent decades, thanks to public information
and education campaigns, standardization of automobile safety features,
and improved vehicle crashworthiness and highway design. Crashes and
fatalities, however, remain an inevitable and
undesirable by-product of transportation.
Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITS) include diverse technologies ranging
from information processing and communications to traffic control
devices and electronics. These technologies were first introduced
as a means of resolving the conflict between increasing travel demand
and insufficient transportation infrastructure. As the value of ITS
to road safety became increasingly apparent, safety quickly took center
stage as a major focus of many ITS
systems.
A brief
survey of the ITS technologies currently deployed and under development
will help demonstrate the value that these applications will have
in improving road safety.
Differentiating
ITS Technologies
These
technologies usually are divided into subsystems according to their
application area, such as Metropolitan ITS versus Rural ITS, or the
applicable transportation system, such as Arterial Management Systems,
Freeway Management Systems, and Transit Management Systems. Because
these subsystems include a variety of technologies, focusing on three
overarching kinds of ITS technologies may offer a more effective approach
to evaluating the safety impacts:
- Infrastructure-based
ITS. Systems that depend exclusively on roadside equipment to
improve the performance of the transportation system.
- Vehicle-based
ITS. Systems that depend exclusively on in-vehicle equipment to
improve driver performance.
- Cooperative
ITS. Systems that use both roadside and in-vehicle equipment to
improve the performance of the transportation system and the driver.
Infrastructure-based
ITS
Four
types of technologies are included under infrastructure-based ITS,
depending on their purpose: roadside traffic management systems, roadside
traveler information systems, intersection traffic management systems,
and pedestrian protection systems.
Roadside
Traffic Management Systems. These technologies are designed to optimize
traffic flows, reduce delays for drivers, and control pollution. They
also reduce traffic conflict and, possibly, lower levels of driver
stress to reduce the likelihood of crashes. The following roadside
devices can accomplish these goals:
- Traffic
control devices, such as ramp meters or signal systems using advanced
traffic control software.
- Compliance-enforcing
devices, like video cameras.
- Traffic
signal coordination systems.
- Dynamic
traffic management, such as using variable message signs to manage
traffic by displaying speed limits appropriate for the driving conditions
and time of day. These devices have a traveler information function
as well and are mentioned in the next technology type also.
- Incident
detection and traffic rerouting, using camera images or induction
loops to enable faster response and clearing of the roadway, coupled
with variable message signs, radio, and other media to redirect traffic
onto alternative routes.
- Optimized
roadside lighting systems that adjust lighting levels according to
the weather and road surface conditions as obtained through sensors.
Roadside
Traveler Information Systems. Traveler information systems improve
safety by providing real-time driving information and risk warning,
enabling the driver to react before a crash occurs. Roadside devices
are only part of the entire system. In-vehicle and vehicle-infrastructure
cooperative technologies also play an important role in traveler information
systems. Roadside devices that contribute to an advanced traveler
information system include:
- Variable
message signs providing information such as weather, speed, incidents,
and available routes.
- Incident
detection systems.
- Weather
management systems, such as sensors that detect weather conditions,
accurate weather-predicting software, and warning devices, including
variable message signs or highway advisory radio.
- Road
surface condition detection sensors that collect information on sensitive
road segments and provide the information to other systems.
Web-based
or kiosk-based pre-trip
information systems also are available.
|
Infrastructure-based
ITS systems such as roadside warning flashers like this one
for red light violations have the potential to provide significant
safety benefits sooner than other systems. |
Intersection
Traffic Management Systems. An intersection traffic management system
has three components:
- Intersection
collision avoidance (ICA) systems are designed to identify approaching
vehicles that have a high probability of violating the red light or
stop sign and to warn drivers on the crossing roads so they can avoid
a crash. Sensors record the speed and deceleration of individual vehicles
to determine those with a very high probability of not stopping or
being unable to stop before entering the intersection. Variable message
signs, strobe lights, or traffic signals can warn other drivers of
the danger.
- Better-protected
left turn phasing has long been used in traffic signal programming,
but the main application has been to optimize traffic flow. The increasing
attention to safety may trigger additional research on protected left
turn
phasing to address safety needs.
- Traffic
signal compliance is enforced through devices such as cameras.
Pedestrian
Protection Systems. Creating safer intersections, increasing signal
cycle time for pedestrians still in the crosswalk, and improving driver
compliance with signals can better protect this vulnerable segment
of road users. Technologies include in-pavement lighting, illuminated
pushbutton pedestrian signals, and automated detectors.
Vehicle-based
ITS
As if
straight from a futuristic science fiction movie, vehicle-based ITS
products warn drivers of dangerous situations, recommend actions,
and even assume partial control of vehicles to avoid collisions. The
so-called "intelligent vehicle" is a major component of
ITS.
Collision
Avoidance Systems. Like high-tech cat whiskers, collision avoidance
systems are designed to help a driver gauge proximity to other drivers
or objects. These systems target avoidance of several kinds of roadway
crashes, such as rear-end collisions, road departure collisions, lane
change and merge collisions, and intersection collisions. These systems
obtain traffic information such as acceleration, relative speed, and
distance from other vehicles through sensors in the vehicle, then
analyze the likelihood of a collision, and give the driver warning
of a high probability of collision.
Driver
Status and Performance Monitoring Systems. Like an attentive copilot,
an onboard driver status and performance monitoring system keeps tabs
on the driver. Using sensors to monitor driver performance and psychophysical
status, the system identifies dangerous driver conditions (e.g., drowsiness)
and distractions and then provides an appropriate warning signal.
Vision
Enhancement Systems. Reduced visibility is a significant factor in
42 percent of all vehicle crashes. Lighting and weather conditions
such as glare, dawn, dusk, dark, artificial light, rain, sleet, snow,
and fog can cause reduced visibility. In-vehicle vision enhancement
services will likely be introduced through onboard systems that use
infrared radiation from pedestrians, animals, and roadside features
to give drivers an enhanced view of what's ahead.
Automated
Collision Notification Systems. In-vehicle collision notification
systems, such as rural mayday systems, send out notification signals
automatically when a crash occurs. By reducing the time between the
occurrence of a collision and notification of emergency service providers,
automated collision notification systems can help emergency responders
get to the scene faster and reduce the consequences of a crash.
Vehicle-Infrastructure
Cooperative ITS
Most
systems discussed so far cannot be isolated as only infrastructure-based
or only vehicle-based. The cooperation of these two actually can improve
performance and increase the benefits. The deployment timeframe for
cooperative systems, however, can be much longer (20 to 30 years)
than for vehicle- or infrastructure-based systems.
Driver
Information Systems. To enhance driver awareness of traffic conditions,
these systems provide traffic and weather information collected by
roadside devices. The information is channeled through
in-vehicle equipment and roadside information displays.
Vision
Enhancement Systems. In addition to in-vehicle vision enhancement
devices, improvements to roadway infrastructure, such as infrared
reflective lane-edge marking, can improve a driver's vision.
Intelligent
Speed Control System. This system gathers information on the current
speed limit from a roadside speed control system and then provides
the information through in-vehicle devices and warns the driver of
a speed violation.
Collision
Avoidance Systems. Combining the power of the in-vehicle driving assistance,
roadside detectors, and warning systems that were discussed earlier
can make collision avoidance systems more efficient and reliable.
Highway-Rail
Intersection Management System. Although highway-rail intersection
crashes account for a small percentage of total crashes, the consequences
of such crashes usually are severe, if not catastrophic. Systems designed
to manage ITS deployment at highway-rail intersections are designed
to improve passive crossings and reduce collisions between automobiles
and railcars.
- Train-detecting
sensors located at highway-rail intersections can detect oncoming
trains and warn drivers via variable message signs.
- Gate
running accounts for 22 percent of crashes and 26 percent of fatalities;
second train warning signs and law enforcement surveillance detectors
can deter drivers from entering an intersection when a train is approaching.
- Highway
congestion is a major factor in gate running, so traffic management
systems can play an important role in reducing highway-rail crashes.
- In-vehicle
information devices also can improve driver awareness of highway-rail
intersections. Large trucks, transit vehicles, and school buses equipped
with these devices are serving as pioneers
in several pilot projects.
|
In-vehicle
warning systems that are triggered by roadside devices such
as this one for a railroad crossing may provide another level
of security for the driving public.
|
Commercial
Vehicle-Related Technologies. Crashes involving trucks and buses usually
are more severe than those involving single passenger cars. Commercial
vehicles are different from passenger cars in equipment characteristics,
performance, and safety requirements. In addition to the more common
ITS applications, such as collision avoidance and driver status monitors,
special technologies are needed to improve the safety of commercial
vehicles. Technologies specifically designed for commercial vehicles
include systems to enhance vehicle stability, vehicle inspection systems,
onboard recorders, and rear warning systems.
Law Enforcement.
Traffic law violations, such as running traffic signals or exceeding
speed limits, are among the primary causes of automobile accidents.
This type of behavior may be reduced through roadside surveillance
devices, such as red light cameras, roadside speed inspection devices,
and onboard automatic vehicle control systems, that can take over
part of the driving tasks before a crash occurs.
Emergency
Service Assistance Systems. Traffic information and route guidance
to emergency services can reduce the time between the occurrence of
crashes and the arrival of emergency services, thus decreasing the
severity of the consequences of a crash. With the help of onboard
GPS systems, roadside traffic management systems can give priority
to emergency vehicles, therefore reducing their arrival time.
|
Video
surveillance technologies such as this one showing vehicles
passing a black ice warning flasher can provide improved warnings
and advice to drivers and, when monitored in traffic centers,
offer more rapid emergency response and incident management.
|
Technologies
Not Targeting Road Safety
Some
technologies have recognizable positive (safety-improving) or negative
(safety-detracting) impacts on road safety.
Navigation
Systems. From digital maps to street-by-street driving directions,
onboard navigation systems already are available to move drivers from
point A to point B more quickly and efficiently. Improved navigation
can reduce unnecessary travel times and distances, which in turn reduces
the risk of crashes. The distraction of fiddling with the device while
driving, however, represents a threat to safety. Researchers need
to evaluate carefully the safety impact of these devices.
Driver
Information Systems. Although traffic information is essential to
improving highway safety, redundant or unnecessary signs can needlessly
distract drivers. Research on whether the display of information is
safe or simply a distraction is needed.
Office-on-Wheels.
The market is introducing various office devices into vehicles, such
as cell phones, faxes, laptops, and onboard computers. The so-called
"office-on-wheels" is designed to make use of driving time,
which is usually considered as wasted. These devices can pose a severe
safety risk to drivers by distracting them from the main task—driving.
Use of cell phones in vehicles, for instance, reportedly has contributed
to a significant number of roadway crashes. Because studies of the
impact of these devices on road safety have not reached agreement,
more research is needed.
Entertainment
Devices. Onboard televisions, designed to make driving time more fun,
can be another source of driver distraction.
Safety
Evaluation of ITS
Evaluations
are critical to ensuring progress toward an integrated ITS and achieving
deployment of these technologies. Evaluations also are essential to
understanding the value, effectiveness, and impact of broader ITS
activities, while allowing for the program's continual refinement.
|
Ramp
traffic signals help optimize traffic flow and also have been
shown to reduce crashes.
|
ITS can
affect three main variables in road safety: exposure in traffic, risk
of crash at a given exposure, and the consequences of a crash. ITS
may affect these factors in a number of ways. Telematics and Intelligent
Transport Applications for Road Safety, a report by the European
Transport Safety Council, summarizes the impacts:
- Direct
in-vehicle modification of the driving task by giving information,
advice, and assistance, or taking over part of the task. These modifications
may influence driver attention, mental load, and decisions about actions
such as choice of speed.
- Direct
influence by roadside systems providing information and advice, such
as guidance on change of route choice.
- Indirect
modification of user behavior. This modification often will not appear
immediately after a change but may show up after a
period of behavioral adaptation. A driver who has an onboard automatic
collision avoidance system may tend to drive more aggressively, assuming
that the device is protecting the vehicle and passengers.
- Indirect
modification of non-user behavior. Non-equipped road users may imitate
the behavior of equipped users, following closer or driving faster
than they should.
- Modification
of interaction between users and non-users. ITS will change communication
between equipped users and non-equipped users such as pedestrians.
- Modification
of accident consequences by intelligent injury-reducing systems in
vehicles, quick and accurate crash reporting, and reduced rescue time.
These
impacts help reveal the challenges ITS technologies present. Road
safety usually is defined in a negative way; safe road traffic is
characterized by the absence of crashes, injuries, and fatalities.
Improving road safety naturally is translated as reducing crashes,
injuries, and fatalities. Unfortunately, these crash-based measures
have a fairly low reliability since crashes are statistically rare
events. To be evaluated accurately, ITS requires large-scale implementation
in traffic and long periods of exposure. Statistics cannot be collected
until systems have been on the road for a long period of time, but
safety must be assessed before systems are marketed. The gradual market
penetration of ITS also can modify road user behavior in a way that
is difficult to study at an early stage of technology deployment.
Continuous modification therefore may be required to achieve the optimum
benefits of ITS.
|
Violent,
life-ending crashes such as this can be avoided with appropriate
technologies.
|
Another
approach for measuring the safety impact of ITS is the use of performance
indicators, such as conflicts, exposure, speed, wearing of personal
protection, and other measurements that have no direct relation to
crashes, but have a known correlation with direct road safety measures.
These measures have a comparatively high reliability, but a lower
or unknown validity since they are not directly measuring crashes.
Decision-makers tend to trust direct road safety indicators more than
indirect measures.
Different
laboratory, simulation, and statistical methods, as well as real-world
tests and follow-up studies after initial deployment, are employed
in the safety evaluation of ITS. The follow-up studies are especially
important, for they enable quick identification of any safety problem,
response, and appropriate adjustment to systems and standards.
|
A
railroad crossing like the one pictured here is typical of the
many unique or complicated scenarios in the highway environment
that are clear targets for ITS safety solutions.
|
Evaluation
Results
The need
for further development of evaluation methods and tools does not mean
that knowledge and experience in this area are insufficient. Numerous
studies have shown an overall safety improvement due to ITS technologies.
Data from FHWA's ITS Handbook 2000 show some of the safety
benefits from operational tests in the United States on various ITS
products and services.
These
technologies have the potential to affect road safety profoundly.
To achieve the greatest safety, pilot projects must be implemented
to evaluate benefits and costs. Based on the information presented
in the FHWA report, fully deployed ITS systems can help eliminate
nearly two million crashes, save 6,000 lives, and prevent 560,000
injuries each year. The total savings to society of these improvements
could total more than $48 billion. Clearly, achieving these results
is still many years into the future. These numbers provide a tremendous
incentive, however, to move as aggressively as possible in ITS research
and deployment.
Hui
Wang is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Tennessee, majoring
in civil/transportation engineering. She worked in FHWA's Midwestern
Resource Center as an intern during the summer of 2001. She also served
as a civil/transportation engineer in China's Department of Highway
Administration for 6 years. Her specialty is ITS planning and highway
design. Wang holds a B.S. in civil engineering from Xi'an Highway
Transportation University and an M.S. in civil/transportation engineering
with a minor in geography (GIS) from the University of Tennessee.
Her current research is devoted to traffic modeling and simulation
and ITS-related highway safety. She is a member of the Institute for
Transportation Engineers (ITE).
Patrick
Hasson is the Safety and Operations team leader in FHWA's Midwestern
Resource Center. In this position, he is involved in regional, national,
and international projects in the areas of geometric design, Intelligent
Transportation Systems, and safety engineering, education, and enforcement.
Hasson and his team provide extensive training, technical assistance,
and expert advice to State departments of transportation, local officials,
national organizations, and others. He is the national coordinator
for the FHWA Stop Red Light Running Program, is actively involved
in the intersection safety programs, is chairman of an international
Expert Group focused on Safety and Technology and participates in
a variety of panels and committees for the National Cooperative Highway
Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board (TRB), and
Institute for Transportation Engineers. He spent 2 years in the Road
Transport Research Program at the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development. Prior to these assignments, Hasson worked on a variety
of transport projects and programs with FHWA, including extensive
activities associated with the transportation impacts of the North
American Free Trade Agreement. He holds a BS in engineering from the
University of Maryland and an MS in engineering from Cornell University.
Harry
(Mac) Lister serves as the ITS specialist in FHWA's Midwestern
Resource Center in Olympia Fields, IL. Prior to this position, he
served as a program coordinator in the ITS Joint Program Office in
Washington. He has been actively involved in ITS projects since 1993
as a project manager implementing ITS systems for the Suburban Mobility
Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) in Detroit, as a consultant
to ITS America, and currently in FHWA. He has worked in the field
of information systems for more than 30 years, the last 15 of which
have been in the transportation industry. He has served on committees
for the Michigan Public Transportation Agency, the American Public
Transportation Association (APTA), American Association of State Highway
Transportation Officials (AASHTO), TRB, ITS America, the National
Transit Institute for whom he is a Fellow, and the National Highway
Institute (NHI). He has a bachelor's degree from Wayne State University
and a master's in business administration from the University of Michigan.
Other
Articles in this issue:
Arizona
Tackles Work Zone Delays
A Hallmark of Context-Sensitive Design
Safer
Roads Thanks to ITS
Do
Better Roads Mean More Jobs?
Exciting
Opportunity for ITS Work
See
It Before It's Built
Roadway
Lighting Revisited
The
Man Who Loved Roads
Benefitting
from LTPP—A State's Perspective
|