HOUSE HEARINGS
[Source: Report: ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT -- Hearings before the
Committee on Ways & Means House of Representatives. 74th Congress,
First Session. On H.R. 4120. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1935.]
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE, February 4, 1935. Report page: 754
(Ed. Note: Dr. Townsend defended the bill before the Committee,
H.R. 4120, but after extended and challenging questioning, he was
forced to admit that the bill needed some amendment.)
Mr. Cooper. "As the bill now stands--as it is presented
to this committee for consideration--if you were sitting in the
seats that we occupy, would you vote to report this bill, and then,
as a Member of the House of Representatives, vote to pass it?"
Dr. Townsend. "I would, with certain amendments--certain
corrections which have necessarily been left to the Secretary of
the Treasury and which were expected to be left to the committee
passing upon the bill."
Mr. Cooper. "You admit, then that the bill should be
amended and changed?"
Dr. Townsend. "Certain elements in it, yes; certain
features of it."
TESTIMONY OF GLENN J. HUDSON BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE,
February 4, 1935. Report page: 738
(Ed. Note: Mr. Hudson was a life insurance underwriter who appeared
to testify in support of the Townsend Plan. During his testimony
he acknowledged several shortcomings of the bill as drafted, culminating
in the following exchange.)
Mr. Hudson. "Again, I state that I am not holding myself
responsible for that bill. Of course, I think that you men have
the power and should have, and that bill should be changed."
Mr. Cooper. "I understood you to state awhile ago very
frankly--and I think you have been frank in your responses."
Mr. Hudson. "I have tried to be."
Mr. Cooper. "I understood you to state awhile ago very
frankly you think this bill is very loosely drawn."
Mr. Hudson. "I restate that."
Mr. Cooper. "Would it be fair to ask you this question:
Suppose you sat in the seats that we occupy at this table. As the
bill now stands in its present form, do you think you would be safe
in voting to report it and support it, as a representative of the
people?"
Mr. Hudson. "No; I do not."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE, February 12, 1935. Report page2: 1126-1127.
(Ed. Note: The Committee challenged Dr. Townsend relentlessly
about the practicality of his Plan, resulting in this admission.)
Dr. Townsend. "It has been very obvious to all of us
that it would be quite impossible to start pensioning all of the
old folks who have attained the age of 60 at one particular time,
but it is also very obvious that it will take several years even
to register them--a good many months. Now, if we were to start at
the age of 75, we will say, and register these old folks as rapidly
as possible and place them upon a $200 per month basis of pensioning,
by the time we got down to the 60-year-olds, all the way through,
time enough would have elapsed and the new amount of money put into
circulation would so stimulate the productive ability of America,
that we could easily take care of these classes as they came along
on a $200 a month basis. I think Dr. Doane's entire analysis of
this situation goes to prove one thing. Nobody has been fool enough
to expect that we could take 10 millions of old folk and put them
immediately on a $200 a month basis without putting this country
into debt considerably to carry it. There has never been any idea
that 10 millions would be retired immediately. But we can eventually
do it by starting at a certain age, and the productive increase
due to this power of buying which these elderly people would have
would unquestionably so stimulate the productivity of America that
the taxes of 2 per cent would be ample to eventually retire them
at that age."
The Chairman. "We are not going to prolong the hearing
by debating the question further, but evidently you must know that
the people who are writing these letters, inundating Congress with
letters by the carload, must have had it sold to them on the theory
that just as soon as this law is enacted they will immediately go
on the pay roll. That is evidently the way they understand it, and
you are bound to know they understand it that way."
Dr. Townsend. "I cannot help that. We all expect to
go on that pay roll."
The Chairman. "If they understood they were not going
to be registered for several years and would not get on the pay
roll immediately, the propaganda would cease at once."
Mr. Vinson. "Mr. Chairman, may I ask Dr. Townsend a
question?"
The Chairman. "Very well."
Mr. Vinson. "I heard your last statement, Doctor, and
noted what you said about the time it would take to get all of them
listed. Do I understand that you are receding from the position
stated in this bill--and I am reading from it--and conceding that
we could not do it at this time?"
Dr. Townsend. "I absolutely stand for that; however,
as I stated, it is very obvious that we could not get to all of
them immediately."
Mr. Vinson. "How long do you think it would take to
register all those above 60 years of age?"
Dr. Townsend. "It would take a good many months."
Mr. Vinson. "How many months?"
Dr. Townsend. "It would be very difficult to estimate.
I presume it will take 2 years before we can get to all of them."
TESTIMONY OF DR. ROBERT R. DOANE BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE, February 12, 1935. Report pages: 1111-1112
(Ed. Note: Mr. Doane was an independent expert on economic matters,
called by the Committee to testify about the economic principles
of the Townsend Plan. Mr. Doane was the Director of Research of
American Business Surveys.)
Dr. Doane. "Yes. In table V, I have given the maximum
theoretical possibilities under a 2 per cent turn-over tax, based
upon 1935 estimated collections as indicated in these previous tables,
and also an estimated annual amount based upon a 1929 basis; that
is, assuming that we get back to the 1929 levels again. I have taken
the total expected tax collections covering the same items that
I have just listed in these tables, and in column 2 I have based
the expectations if all producer and consumer expenditures were
taxed, in column 3 the expectations if all expenditures of producers
and consumers, plus governmental and institutional expenditures
were taxed; and in the last column, the total expectation if all
gross transactions and property transfers were taxed."
"In column 1 it would indicate, on present levels, the maximum
expected would be $4,000,000,000 if we limit it to this restricted
group as shown in table 4. If we included all possible consumer
and producer expenditures, we could expect there would be approximately
$6,000,000,000 at these levels. And in the third column, the maximum
expectation would be around 9 billion; 9.6 billion."
Mr. Hill. "That is per year?"
Dr. Doane. "Per year."
Mr. Lamneck. "Would it be well at this point to refer
to the testimony that we received before, to show the gross revenue
of about 8 billion; is that not right?"
The Chairman. "According to my recollection."
Mr. Lamneck. "And you say it will be about 9 billion;
is that right?"
Dr. Doane. "Yes; on all transactions and transfers."
Mr. Hill. "May I ask, Doctor, are you including financial
transactions such as payment of salaries?"
Dr. Doane. "Yes. That is the total gross, of everything.
You understand I an not recommending that all these transactions
be taxed, I am just stating here what it would be if they were all
taxed."
TESTIMONY OF GLENN HUDSON BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE,
February 4, 1935. Report pages: 728-729
(Ed. Note: Glenn Hudson was a Townsend Plan official who was
presented as one of the Plan's economic experts. In this exchange
with the Committee, Mr. Hudson tries to justify the Plan's estimates
of potential tax revenues based on assumptions about the volume
of transactions in the economy.)
Mr. Knutson. "In your literature the claim is made
that the total money value of all transactions in 1933 was a trillion--we
used to talk of millions when I came to Congress, then it was billions,
now it is trillions--was a trillion, two hundred million?"
Dr. Townsend. "Yes, sir."
Mr. Knutson. "The authority for that was given as the
Fifty-fifth Statistical Abstract of the United States. I sent over
to the Library of Congress Friday and got the Fifty-fifth Statistical
Abstract of the United States, and I could not find it. I wish that
your statistician would give me the page where this information
was obtained, because I am pretty busy and I would not like to go
through that book again."
Mr. Hudson. "I have never made such a quotation from
the Fifty-fifth."
Mr. Knutson. "I did not say that you had made it. It
has been made in the literature that has been sent out and has been
sent to me."
Mr. Hudson. "That is probably true. It does not appear
in the Fifty-fifth Statistical Abstract. I could not find it."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE, February 4, 1935. Report pages: 735-736
(Ed. Note: This exchange concerns the potential impact of the
Townsend Plan's taxes on the value of the dollar.)
Mr. Hill. Dr. Townsend, I understood you to say that in
1929 the dollar turned over 132 times."
Dr. Townsend. "Yes, sir."
Mr. Hill. "What do you estimate would be the turn-over
under the provisions of this bill?"
Dr. Townsend. "It should be vastly increased."
Mr. Hill. "About how much?"
Dr. Townsend. "Over anything we have ever known. I
do not know that there is any particular way of making a definite
estimate. I figure that under this system of taxation whereby everybody
gets his shoulder under the load, making it so light that no one
will feel it, particularly, seeing to it that a sufficient amount
of money is in circulation constantly, forced there by the strength
of the National Government, we shall be able to create a state of
business that will quadruple anything we have ever known."
Mr. Hill. "Quadruple? That is multiplied four times?"
Dr. Townsend. "Yes, sir."
Mr. Hill. "Say, 528 times under the plan of this bill;
$1 would turn over 528 times."
Dr. Townsend. "Approximately."
Mr. Hill. "That is, in a year?"
Dr. Townsend. "Yes."
Mr. Hill. "That would be 528 transactions on the average
for a dollar?"
Dr. Townsend. "Yes, sir."
Mr. Hill. "Each transaction would bear a 2 per cent
tax. The burden of tax that each dollar would carry would be twice
528, or $10.56."
Dr. Townsend. "Then we will easily reduce the tax,
the rate of tax that is provided for in the bill. It can be reduced
until no one will know that he is paying a tax. It will be insignificant--a
half of 1 per cent will carry the entire pension roll, once we get
fairly going under this system."
Mr. Hill. "$10.56 burden on each dollar would deflate
the purchasing power of the dollar by how much? Have you figured
that out?"
Dr. Townsend. "You cannot figure it out. You cannot
possibly tell what the opposing forces of inflation are. There are
opposing forces to inflation always. One of them lies in the fact
that mass production has always a tremendous influence toward price
deflation."
Mr. Hill. "If you had a velocity of turn-over of 528
times, and imposed upon that credit turn-over which ordinarily goes
along with the dollar turn-over, you would have an inflation of
the circulating currency and circulating credit that would be almost
beyond the power of the mind to grasp. Do you think there would
be any inflationary effects from that, that would tend to reduce
the purchasing power of the dollar to practically nothing?"
Dr. Townsend. "I do not think there would be any tendency
toward undue inflation at all for the simple reason that the entire
tendency of competition would be the reverse. If you are in business
and something happens to quadruple your volume of business, certainly
you would quadruple your volume of profits."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE,
February 4, 1935. Report pages: 732
(Ed. Note: This exchange concerns potential adverse impacts
from the taxes of the Townsend Plan.)
Dr. Townsend. "May I speak a word in reply to that?"
"Gentlemen, think back a little bit. We had a war 20 years
ago."
Mr. Knutson. "Yes."
Dr. Townsend. "If an increase in price means a tax,
we paid a 100 per cent tax at that time and liked it. It was the
best period of prosperity this country ever saw."
Mr. Knutson. "And what followed it?"
Dr. Townsend. "What followed it? Never mind what followed.
We are not going to have any such thing as that follow. We propose
a prosperity based on the turn-over of money such as we had in that
day, and we are going to keep it up."
Mr. Knutson. "As I understand it, then, this is a bill
to abolish the morning after the night before, speaking in terms
of economics."
Dr. Townsend. "This is going to abolish the morning
after, certainly."
SENATE HEARINGS
[Source: Report: ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT -- Hearings before the
Committee on Finance United States Senate. 74th Congress, First
Session. On S. 1130. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1935.]
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE,
February 16, 1935. Report page: 1042
(Ed. Note: This continues the debate started during the House
hearings about how much money in benefits the Townsend Plan might
actually pay.)
The Chairman. "Doctor, why was it that you stated before
the House Ways and Means Committee that this 2 per cent turn-over
tax would get $24,000,000,000 a year, and now you intimate to the
Committee that you will probably only receive a little over $5,000,000,000
a year? What has caused you to change your mind about that?"
Dr. Townsend. "I did not change my mind about that
at all. It is very obvious, Mr. Chairman, that we cannot put eight
million or seven million of old folks on the pension roll immediately,
and as a consequence of the slowness of getting them on the pension
roll, the full volume of transactions due to their spending is not
going to be felt for maybe two or three years."
The Chairman. "As I understand it, then, you do think
it would raise $24,000,000,000 a year in two or three years, but
in the beginning it will probably not be over five billion?"
Dr. Townsend. "We probably would not be able to get
all of the people on the pension roll either."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE,
February 16, 1935. Report page: 1024
(Ed. Note: This exchange concerns one of the key flaws in the
Townsend Plan, i.e., how to determine that the pensioner has in
fact spent the monthly allotment in the month received.)
Senator Barkley. "How are you going to determine that
he has spent it for commodities at the end of the month?"
Dr. Townsend. "The banker will be in a position to
know."
Senator Barkley. "How?"
Dr. Townsend. "It will be a very difficult thing to
ascertain."
Senator Barkley. "The banker has got to be the inspector
for every one of the pensioners who has an account in his bank?"
Dr. Townsend. "Not necessarily the banker."
Senator Barkley. "Somebody will have to do the inspecting."
Dr. Townsend. "But not necessarily the banker. Everyone
who is spending the money, who is known to be the recipient of it,
is going to have neighbors immediately about him."
Senator Barkley. "So the neighbors are going to watch
him?"
Dr. Townsend. "The neighbors are going to watch him,
certainly."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE,
February 16, 1935. Report pages: 1063-1064
(Ed. Note: This exchange further probes the issue of how anyone
might be able to establish that a pensioner was in fact spending
their pension within 30 days, as the Plan required.)
Senator Gerry. "Your idea is the community would take
an interest in seeing that it would be spent?"
Dr. Townsend. "I think so."
Senator Gerry. "Did it work that way in prohibition?"
Dr. Townsend. "In prohibition?"
Senator Gerry. "Yes."
Dr. Townsend. "No. Why?"
Senator Gerry. "I am asking you."
Dr. Townsend. "Because there was very little affect
on the part of the powers that had charge of the enforcement of
the prohibition law, to do anything with it."
Senator Barkley. "There was also a laxity on the part
of people in the community to keep the enforcement officers informed,
to the extent that they did not want to be snooping around among
their neighbors to find out whether or not there was a violation.
Your bill set up an official snooping committee in each precinct
in the United States to watch over the expenditure of this money,
and follow it out to the ultimate results."
Dr. Townsend. "I cannot see that there would be any
snooping necessary."
Senator Barkley. "What would the committee that you
set up in the bill be required to do?"
Dr. Townsend. "To receive complaints."
Senator Barkley. "To receive complaints from whom?"
Dr. Townsend. "From those who thought the law was being
violated."
Senator Barkley. "There would be a committee set up
in each voting precinct to receive complaints from the neighbors
who thought that one of their next door neighbors were spending
some of the $200, or $400, or $600, if there happened to be three
of them who were 60 years old living in the same household, in a
way that they did not approve of?"
Dr. Townsend. "There would have to be some sort of
committee until the people became accustomed to the new regime,
the new system."
TESTIMONY OF DR. F. E. TOWNSEND BEFORE THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE,
February 16, 1935. Report page: 1028
(Ed. Note: Since the Townsend Plan proposed a tax on all transactions,
it would be necessary, as this dialog points out, to monitor the
transactions of all self-employed persons, such as farmers.)
Senator Barkley. "Your plan contemplates that the Secretary
of the Treasury shall issue a license to every farmer in the nation
for which he might pay whatever fee is fixed, and unless he so registers
and is licensed he cannot sell what he has produced?"
Dr. Townsend. "We propose to have some measure such
as that set up."
Senator Barkley. "That is true, though, that is a fact?"
Dr. Townsend. "Yes, that is true." |