Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 89* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 105* 104 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 99 96 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 97* 94* Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 88* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 104* 104 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 116* 109* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 78* 78* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 105* 90* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 94* 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 105* 103 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 112* 103 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 100 93 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 104* 96 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 103 104 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90* 89* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 100 101 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 106* 100 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 109* 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 104* 95* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 103* 90* Great Falls, MT....................... 91* 83* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 97* 91* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 96* 98 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 116* 112* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 98* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 107* 108* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 98 100 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 99 92* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 99 80* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 84* 93* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 103 103 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 95* 97 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 97 106* Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 94* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 103 110* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 110* 122* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 89* 82* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 95* 116* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 93* 92* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 93* 108* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 109* 114* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 100 110* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 101 109* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 96 109* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 89* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 95* 103 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 101 114* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 105* 111* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92* 104* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 98 103 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 95 112* Great Falls, MT....................... 78* 103 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 95* 101 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 90* 104 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 110* 130* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 85* 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 101 122* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 98 92* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 96 105* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 98 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90* 89* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 95 107* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 103 97* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 95 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 82* 92* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 98 97 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 106 116* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 68* 78* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 101 99 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 96 94* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 111* 104 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 108 111* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 91 98 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 97 102 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 104 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 86* 87* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 96 93* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 104 104 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 97 106* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 104 103* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 104 99 Great Falls, MT....................... 90* 84* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 85* 97* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 86* 94* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 107 114* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 90* 97* Honolulu, HI.......................... 108 97 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 94 99 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 101 94* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 94 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 88* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 102 104 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 97 109* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 96 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 86* 85* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 119* 96 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 140* 119* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 74* 89* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 128* 109* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 87* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 100 103 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 147* 117* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 101 103 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 115* 106 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 111 105 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 105 82* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 114* 104 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 104 112* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 113* 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 128* 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 117* 109* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 133* 103 Great Falls, MT....................... 124* 97 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 99 96* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 89* 87* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 129* 116* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 114* 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 129* 111* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 100 96 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 100 94 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 107 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 100 94 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 114* 109 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 105 94 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 96 97 Bloomington, IN....................... 107* 108* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 120* 107* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 119* 114* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 84* 76* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 118* 105 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 111* 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 112* 102 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 115* 108* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 110* 102 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 114* 108* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 106 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 101 88* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 117* 105 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 110* 106 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 129* 112* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 106* 102 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 109* 112* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 111* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 110* 99 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 112* 104 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 116* 95 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 123* 110* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 110* 104 Honolulu, HI.......................... 121* 103 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 112* 96 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 111* 97 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 117* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 101 103 Johnstown, PA......................... 88* 80* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 102 92* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 106* 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 95* 104 Lincoln, NE........................... 91* 84* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 111* 108* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 98 91* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 98* 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 101 104 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 105* 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 112* 111 Mobile, AL............................ 92* 78* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 101 91* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 119* 116* Ocala, FL............................. 93* 80* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93* 86* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 94* 92 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 97 86* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108* 107* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 101 103 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 99 95 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 108* 100 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 113* 107* Reading, PA........................... 105* 111* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 100 95 Richmond, VA.......................... 101 98 Rochester, NY......................... 100 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 102 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 93* 108* Johnstown, PA......................... 86* 94* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 99 104 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 97 123* Knoxville, TN......................... 100 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 86* 98 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 108* 117* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 92* 111* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 89* 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 98 107* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 97 107* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 105* 124* Mobile, AL............................ 83* 92* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 101 101 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 118* 124* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 97 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 86* 101 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 88* 108* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 112* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 102 106* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 96 103 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 98 120* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 114* 124* Reading, PA........................... 93* 108* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 96* 105* Richmond, VA.......................... 96* 105* Rochester, NY......................... 97 114* Rockford, IL.......................... 98 106* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 93* 99 Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 85* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 99 100 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 101 101 Knoxville, TN......................... 98 96* Lincoln, NE........................... 83* 89* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 113* 108* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 99 97* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 99 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 95 98 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 104 104* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 109 105* Mobile, AL............................ 94 93* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 101 100 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 115* 117* Ocala, FL............................. 92* 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88* 89* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 100 89* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 95 89* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 107* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 105 100 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 90* 99 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 113* 107* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 101 108* Reading, PA........................... 105 103 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 104 98 Richmond, VA.......................... 94 102 Rochester, NY......................... 96 99 Rockford, IL.......................... 98 97* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 116* 106* Johnstown, PA......................... 108 92* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 115 103 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 122* 99 Knoxville, TN......................... 92 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 94 98 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 125* 114* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 119* 96 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 105 103 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 104 99 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 122* 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 125* 108 Mobile, AL............................ 103 102 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 104 97 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 149* 119* Ocala, FL............................. 91* 110* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 115* 111* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 101 95 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 103 107* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 119* 116* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 92 107 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 109 101 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 130* 115* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 127* 115* Reading, PA........................... 115* 112* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 106 114* Richmond, VA.......................... 103 105* Rochester, NY......................... 110* 91* Rockford, IL.......................... 120* 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 110* 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 93* 89* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 116* 100 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 106* 107* Knoxville, TN......................... 97 99 Lincoln, NE........................... 98 95 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 110* 107 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 109* 94* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 106* 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 104 103 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 114* 108* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 126* 111* Mobile, AL............................ 102 104 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 111* 107* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 117* 113* Ocala, FL............................. 101 106 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94* 86* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 94 110 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 117* 109* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 107 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 106 103 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 108* 98 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 110* 102 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 122* 109* Reading, PA........................... 111* 102 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 106* 101 Richmond, VA.......................... 112* 103 Rochester, NY......................... 109* 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 112* 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 111* 104 Salinas, CA........................... 117* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 94* 94* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 113* 108* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 123* 113* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 114* 103 Springfield, MA....................... 113* 102 Springfield, MO....................... 91* 84* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106* 97 Tallahassee, FL....................... 95 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 97 91* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94* 86* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 101 107 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 112* 105 York-Hanover, PA...................... 100 106* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 99 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 111* 120* Salinas, CA........................... 121* 127* San Antonio, TX....................... 93* 94* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 111* 124* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 119* 133* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 103 128* Springfield, MA....................... 113* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 88* 93* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 101 104 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87* 103 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 101 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91* 101 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 105 108* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 112* 114* York-Hanover, PA...................... 100 105* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 94* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 104 107* Salinas, CA........................... 127* 114* San Antonio, TX....................... 96 92* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 104 107* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 123* 122* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 112* 107* Springfield, MA....................... 109* 112* Springfield, MO....................... 91* 88* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 91* 92 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 97 98 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 92* 93* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 98 99 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 106 113* York-Hanover, PA...................... 89* 97 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 86* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 114 120* Salinas, CA........................... 141* 111* San Antonio, TX....................... 109 106* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 125* 113* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 138* 119* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 124* 111* Springfield, MA....................... 123* 108 Springfield, MO....................... 87* 91* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 135* 115* Tallahassee, FL....................... 91* 91* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 110 98 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94 98 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 99 94* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 112* 119* York-Hanover, PA...................... 111* 102 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 107 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 125* 112* Salinas, CA........................... 111* 107* San Antonio, TX....................... 107* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 115* 103 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 119* 112* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 129* 115* Springfield, MA....................... 120* 116* Springfield, MO....................... 102 100 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 116* 113* Tallahassee, FL....................... 102 95 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 102 104 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 101 92* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 113* 96 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 117* 109* York-Hanover, PA...................... 106* 107* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 111* 113* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.