1. Inventory existing hydrologic data available in the vicinity of the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) including all data that can be used for determining past and current conditions.
2. Design and install a hydrologic monitoring network for the FPNWR. The network will include continuous and intermittently monitored ground-water level and surface water stations. The network will be used to monitor hydrologic conditions within the FPNWR and to evaluate the relationship between ground water and surface water.
3. Collect other hydrologic data as needed to assist in determining the hydrologic conditions in the area. Examples of other types of data include stable isotopes, which can be used to determine sources of water in a sample, evapotranspiration data, surface and borehole geophysical data, seepage measurements.
4. Evaluate historical and current data to determine trends and baseline conditions at and in the vicinity of the FPNWR.
Sonenshein, Roy, Unpublished Material, Hydrologic monitoring and synthesis of existing hydrologic data in the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and surrounding areas.Online Links:
Project personnel include Larry Richardson (FPNWR)
Roy Sonenshein
U.S. Geological Survey
3110 SW 9th Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315
USA
954 377-5924 (voice)
sunshine@usgs.gov
The biologic communities of the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) and surrounding areas have been historically impacted by the changes in hydrology associated with past highway and canal construction and will be impacted by future plans for hydrologic restoration. Currently, little hydrologic data is collected in the vicinity of the FPNWR. Two continuous recording stations located up gradient in Big Cypress National Park (stations A1 and A2) are the nearest wetland stations to the FPNWR. Additional stations are located in the canals near the FPNWR. Information on current hydrologic conditions and a monitoring network are needed in order to determine the impact of the planned Picayune Strand Hydrologic Restoration on the hydrology of the area. These hydrologic changes will have effects on the threatened and endangered species as well as other biologic communities in the FPNWR.There are two components to the hydrology of the area that have an impact on the ecology, surface water, and shallow ground water. The surface water consists of wetlands within and canals bordering the FPNWR. Canals bordering the refuge have a major impact on the hydrology in the area. The FPNWR currently maintains a hydrologic monitoring program of 8 stations (Larry Richardson, verbal communication). These hydrologic monitoring stations have not been surveyed to a vertical datum, which is required to adequately evaluate the data being collected. The survey information is required to determine the relationship between ground water and surface water in the area. Additional information needed to evaluate the hydrology of the area include stage and flow rates in the canals bordering the FPNWR.
A literature search will be conducted in library databases and at the offices of the FPNWR to locate relevant historical information about the refuge. Important information includes historical water level and flow data and modification to the canals surrounding the refuge.
Existing hydrologic conditions will be evaluated to determine the data types and optimal design to monitor surface water flows and stage, ground-water levels, and ground-water / surface-water interactions. The existing water-level monitoring network will be evaluated to determine if it fits into the optimal design. Locations to drill new monitor wells will be determined. Locations to install stage and flow monitoring equipment in canals bordering the refuge and within the refuge will be determined. New monitoring wells will be drilled and instrumented. Wells installed near current real-time weather stations in the refuge will be connected, if feasible, to the refuge telemetry network.
Differential GPS will be used to establish reference marks at key locations, traditional surveying will be used as needed to tie in all monitoring locations to the established reference marks. The elevations will be referenced to NAVD 88.
Continuous recording equipment will be operated for a minimum of one year. Data will be processed and posted on the SOFIA data exchange web site. Following FY07, it is anticipated that the monitoring network will be turned over to the FPNWR to operate. A review of the stations will be conducted to determine redundant stations to minimize the long-term expense required to operate the network.
Various additional methods will be evaluated to determine if they will be useful in evaluating the hydrologic budget of the refuge. Among these techniques are seepage meters, surface and borehole geophysics, stable isotopes, evapotranspiration data, and satellite imagery.
Person who carried out this activity:
Roy Sonenshein
U.S. Geological Survey
3110 SW 9th Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315
USA
954 377-5924 (voice)
sunshine@usgs.gov
Differential GPS will be used to establish reference marks at key locations, traditional surveying will be used as needed to tie in all monitoring locations to the established reference marks.
not available
not available
Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
- Access_Constraints: none
- Use_Constraints: none
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, Fl 33701
USA
727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for
Coastal Geology
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather
Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.7.33 on Mon Aug 14 10:44:19 2006