UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before The SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 38003 / December 2, 1996 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9193 -------------------------- : ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, In the Matter of : MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING : REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO JAMES W. ADAMS : SECTION 15(b) AND 19(h) OF THE : SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 -------------------------- I. In connection with proposed administrative proceedings pur- suant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), James W. Adams ("Adams") has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has determined is in the public interest to accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or in which the Commission is a party, Respondent Adams, without admitting or denying the findings, except as to jurisdiction, and the entry of the order of permanent injunction described in paragraph III.C. below, which are admitted, consents to the entry of this Order instituting proceedings, making findings and imposing the remedial sanctions contained in this Order. II. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that public proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act be, and hereby are, instituted. III. On the basis of this Order Instituting Public Proceedings and the Offer of Settlement submitted by the Respondent, the Commission finds that: A. From at least May 1988 to July 1992, Adams was a principal and indirect owner of Adams Securities Inc. ("Adams Securities"), a defunct broker-dealer formerly registered with the Commission. ==========================================START OF PAGE 2====== B. On October 4, 1993, Respondent Adams pled guilty to, among other things, one count of violating 15 U.S.C. 78(q)(a)(1) and 17 C.F.R. 240.17a-3(a)(1) and 240.17a-4(b)(4) in U.S. v. James Adams, CR-S-93-268- PMP(LRL), in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. In his sworn plea, Adams admitted, among other things, that he failed to make and keep certain books and records by: (1) failing to record the identity of the purchaser executing trades in thirty eight brokerage accounts, and (2) destroying memoranda of trading instructions he received from the purchaser. C. On October 2, 1996, Respondent Adams was permanently enjoined in SEC v. James W. Adams, Civil Action No. CV- S-96-910-PMP (U.S.D.C. Nev.), pursuant to his consent and without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, from future violations of Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a- 3(a)(1) and 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder. D. The Commission's complaint filed in the injunctive matter alleged, among other things, that Adams, as a controlling person of Adams Securities, failed to make and keep certain books and records by: (1) failing to record the identity of the purchaser executing trades in thirty eight brokerage accounts, and (2) destroying memoranda of trading instructions he received from the purchaser. E. The Commission has reviewed Adams' financial statement, his sworn testimony as to his financial condition, and other evidence adduced by Adams, and, provided that he has submitted true, accurate, and complete testimony as to his financial condition, including his assets, liabilities, income and expenses, has determined that Adams does not have the financial ability to pay disgorgement of $7,500 which he received in commissions from his activities described in Section III. paragraphs B. and D. above. IV. In view of entry of the injunction discussed in paragraphs III. C. and D. above, the Commission finds it is in the public interest to impose the sanctions specified by James W. Adams in his Offer. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: ==========================================START OF PAGE 3====== A. James W. Adams is hereby barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, investment company, or municipal securities dealer, and B. James W. Adams pay disgorgement in the amount of $7,500.00 plus interest, dating to the date of this Order, at the prejudgment rate, provided, however, that the payment of such disgorgement is waived based upon Adams' demonstrated inability to pay disgorgement and that the Division of Enforcement ("Division") may petition the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") to reopen this matter to consider Adam's inability to disgorge funds if the Division obtains information from any source that the financial information provided by Adams was inaccurate or incomplete in any material aspect. In connection with any such petition, the ALJ may consider ordering Adams to pay $7,500 in disgorgement plus interest. Adams may not, by way of a defense to such a petition, contest the allegations and findings in this Order or assert that disgorgement should not be ordered for the violations of the federal securities laws alleged therein. By the Commission. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary