In an updated search to October 2003, no new eligible studies were identified.
An additional reference has been included in a new paragraph at the end of the Discussion.
Premature babies have immature immune systems and frequently pick up harmful infections in the hospital.
This means they are at high risk of sepsis (life-threatening bacterial infection). The most common bacteria causing sepsis in neonatal intensive care are coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS). One way of trying to prevent CoNS infection is by infusing low doses of the antibiotic vancomycin (giving the drug by intermittent infusion or continuous drip). The review of trials found that low dose continuous infusions, or low dose intermittent administration, of vancomycin reduce the risk of a baby getting sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit. There is not enough evidence to show if this approach increases antibiotic resistance in nurseries.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin prophylaxis for the prevention of late-onset sepsis, coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, and effects on length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the preterm neonate.
Searches were made of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE, (MeSH terms: Vancomycin and Sepsis; limits: age groups, newborn infants), HealthStar and EMBase, electronic abstracts, personal files and conference proceedings up to October 2003.
Randomized controlled trials which compared the incidence of sepsis and mortality in preterm neonates receiving vancomycin prophylaxis versus a control group receiving no prophylaxis.
Data regarding clinical outcomes including the overall incidence of sepsis, the incidence of coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms were excerpted from previous clinical trials. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
The administration of prophylactic vancomycin reduced the incidence of both total neonatal nosocomial sepsis and coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis in eligible preterm infants. Mortality, length of stay, and evidence of vancomycin toxicity were not significantly different between the two groups. There was insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the nurseries involved in these trials.
The use of prophylactic vancomycin in low doses reduces the incidence of nosocomial sepsis in the neonate. The methodologies of these studies may have contributed to the low rate of sepsis in the treated groups, as the blood cultures drawn from central lines may have failed to grow due to the low levels of vancomycin in the infusate. Although there is a theoretical concern regarding the development of resistant organisms with the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, there is insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms. Few clinically important benefits have been demonstrated for very low birth weight infants treated with prophylactic vancomycin. It therefore appears that routine prophylaxis with vancomycin should not be undertaken at present.
Nosocomial infections are a frequent and significant cause of morbidity in the preterm infant. Infections diagnosed after the first 72 hours of life are arbitrarily deemed to be "nosocomial", and are frequently associated with clinical deterioration including increased apnea, temperature instability, abdominal distension, lethargy, septic shock, necrotising enterocolitis, meningitis and death. Preterm infants are at higher risk of infection than term infants because of immature immune responses, which include reduced phagocytosis, opsonisation and intracellular killing (Kallman 1998, Drossou 1997), decreased immunoglobulin concentrations (Ballow 1986), and poor skin (Rutter 1996) and gut barrier function (Insoft 1996). The risk of sepsis is further increased by the use of central venous catheters to administer parenteral nutrition (Johnson-Robbins 1996) and lipids (Nataro 1994).
Coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) have emerged as the most common cause of bacteremia in the neonatal intensive care unit (Patrick 1990). There are difficulties in the diagnosis of CoNS septicemia as the organism is a frequent skin commensal, which often results in contamination of blood cultures, either at the time of blood draw or during the blood handling process. Common diagnostic definitions (such as that of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (Gaynes 1995)) require the presence of clinical signs of sepsis and a positive blood culture to confirm the diagnosis. However, clinical signs are often subtle and blood cultures are rarely drawn in the absence of clinical signs. These definitions do not adequately differentiate between true CoNS sepsis, catheters colonized with CoNS, and contaminated blood cultures. These unresolved distinctions significantly impact upon this review.
The use of low dose vancomycin infusions to prevent CoNS contamination of intravenous nutrition solutions, at a concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the organism in the hyperalimentation solution, but well below therapeutic dosing levels, is one suggested way of preventing CoNS sepsis during intravenous hyperalimentation. To date there have been five randomized controlled trials evaluating vancomycin for prophylaxis against sepsis in the preterm neonate. Nosocomial sepsis has been associated with morbidity, mortality, increased length of stay, and increased hospital costs (Stoll 1996). Therefore, a reduction in the incidence of sepsis carries significant potential benefit.
The relevant and important outcomes that will be reviewed include the incidence of overall sepsis, as well as CoNS sepsis, as defined by standard clinical criteria plus positive blood cultures, CoNS associated morbidity (such as necrotising enterocolitis), mortality (although death is rarely attributed to CoNS sepsis), length of hospital stay (as this appears to be increased by CoNS sepsis), total exposure to vancomycin (as this may be reduced by prophylaxis if fewer therapeutic courses are required), vancomycin toxicity, particularly ototoxicity (as nephrotoxicity appears to be rare (Bhatt-Mehta 1999), and the development of resistant organisms.
The groups who are most at risk are the very low birth weight infant (less than 1500 grams) and the extremely low birth weight infant (less than 1000 grams); these groups will be analyzed separately where possible. A continuous infusion of vancomycin may have a different efficacy to intermittent dosing, would likely require different total doses, and will create very different serum concentration profiles; therefore, these two modes of prophylaxis will be analyzed independently.
To evaluate the effects of vancomycin prophylaxis on the incidence of late-onset sepsis, coagulase negative staphylococcal (CoNS) sepsis and mortality, as well as the effects on length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the preterm neonate. Planned subgroup analyses will include stratification by birthweight, where possible, and the use of continuous versus intermittent vancomycin dosing.
Randomized controlled trials comparing the incidence of sepsis in preterm neonates receiving prophylactic vancomycin versus a control group receiving no prophylaxis were evaluated.
Preterm infants, with additional risk factors for infection such as a birth weight less than 1500 grams, use of central venous catheters, and administration of intravenous hyperalimentation.
Prophylactic vancomycin as intermittent intravenous doses or by continuous infusion.
Data for the following clinical outcomes were sought:
1. Sepsis, all pathogens (number of patients with one or more episodes).
2. Sepsis, coagulase negative staphylococci (number of patients with one or more episodes).
3. Mortality before hospital discharge.
4. Length of stay in the NICU (days).
5. Total vancomycin exposure (milligrams per patient during the NICU stay).
6. Complications, hearing impairment (results of auditory brainstem evoked response prior to hospital discharge).
7. Post-treatment culture to determine the presence of vancomycin resistant
organisms (number of infants with any post-treatment culture positive for
vancomycin resistant organisms).
A search was conducted using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. In addition, searches were made of MEDLINE using the PubMed search engine, from the years 1966 - 1999, and the search terms "vancomycin and sepsis or infection or septicemia" and "infant, newborn". This strategy, performed in May 1999, retrieved 163 articles; further filtering using "randomized" or "controlled" reduced this to 14 and 9 reports, respectively. The HealthStar database was also searched using 'Internet Grateful Med' and the search terms vancomycin and premature or preterm. This retrieved 28 articles and no new randomized controlled trials. Also in May 1999 the EMBase paediatric and 'drugs and pharmacology' databases were searched from 'Healthgate' using the terms vancomycin and preterm or premature; 19 and 22 references were retrieved, respectively, and no further randomized controlled trials. In addition, we searched electronic abstracts of the Academic Pediatric Societies annual meetings from 1996-1999, and personal files.
Updated searches were made of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE, (MeSH terms: Vancomycin and Sepsis; limits: age groups, newborn infants), HealthStar and EMBase, electronic abstracts, personal files and conference proceedings up to October 2003. No additional studies were identified from these sources.
Studies were assessed for inclusion in the review by each reviewer individually. All five prospective randomized trials that were identified were included in this review. Only the prospective randomized phase of the trial by Moller 1993 was included in the statistical analyses. The included studies were judged to be of acceptable quality for inclusion in the review by all evaluators.
Data regarding clinical outcomes including the overall incidence of sepsis, the incidence of coagulase negative staphylococcal (CoNS) sepsis, mortality, length of stay, exposure to vancomycin, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms were excerpted from the studies. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Statistics: For categorical outcomes, typical estimates for relative risk and risk difference were calculated. For outcomes measured on a continuous scale, typical estimates for weighted mean difference were calculated. 95% confidence intervals were used. A fixed effect model was assumed.
Pre-specified subgroup analyses were:
1. Continuous vancomycin infusion compared with intermittent dosing.
2. Extremely low birth weight infants (<1000 g).
Studies included in this review are: Baier 1998 n=38, Cooke 1997 n=72, Kacica 1994 n=150, Moller 1993 n=41, and Spafford 1994 n=70. Details of each study are given in the "Characteristics of Included Studies" table and references.
Three of the five studies administered prophylactic vancomycin as a continuous infusion in the hyperalimentation. Cooke (1997) and Moller (1993) administered vancomycin at a dose of 5 mg/kg over one hour twice daily. Only Spafford (1994) appears to have exclusively enrolled infants < 1000 gm at birth, and this study included only infants with a central venous catheter; the other studies included infants with a birthweight less than 1500 grams, with or without central catheters. All studied infants were receiving parenteral nutrition.
Baier (1998) enrolled infants within two weeks of birth, with normal renal function, who were not receiving vancomycin treatment. Infants were randomized by birthweight stratified blocks of 250 g, to receive either vancomycin 25 microg/ml or placebo added to their hyperalimentation for the duration of such therapy. Surveillance for infection involved sepsis evaluations at the discretion of the attending physician, and required at least two positive blood cultures for the diagnosis of sepsis. Empiric therapy for sepsis 'often' included vancomycin. Upon removal, the catheter tips were rolled and cultured with colony counts. Bacteremia was defined as a positive culture from 2 sites.
Cooke (1997) enrolled infants of less than two weeks with normal renal function. The allocation was blinded but not the treatment which was 5 mg/kg of vancomycin over one hour twice daily in a peripheral vein. Treatment continued during hyperalimentation or until four weeks of age. They performed daily complete blood counts and C-reactive proteins, and did not specify the use of paired cultures. Weekly surveillance cultures were performed from groin, rectum and throat. They defined two groups with positive cultures, those with and without C-reactive protein elevation. Routine therapy for suspected sepsis was co-amoxyclav and gentamicin.
Kacica (1994) enrolled infants within two weeks of birth, not on antibiotics with normal renal function. No stratification was indicated. Vancomycin was added to the hyperalimentation fluid at a dose of 25 microg/ml. Therapy was for the duration of hyperalimentation or a maximum of one month. Surveillance for infection involved sepsis evaluations at the discretion of the attending physician, and required at least one blood culture. At the time of culture, an additional aliquot of blood was placed in an aerobic culture bottle containing a resin to remove antibacterial activity. Empiric therapy for suspected sepsis included amikacin and ampicillin. Routine surveillance cultures of skin and rectum were performed at initiation and termination. Hearing screening was performed at hospital discharge. Data for the number of infants who had a culture positive for CoNS are not given, although the large majority of the Gram positive cultures(37/43) were CoNS.
Moller (1993) administered vancomycin for prophylaxis as the second phase of a three phase trial involving different infants in each phase in an attempt to reduce the incidence of nosocomial sepsis. The second phase included 41 infants less than 1500 g. Infants were enrolled after ruling out or treating "early onset sepsis" and vancomycin prophylaxis continued until intravenous access was no longer needed, the infant weighed greater than 1500 g, or the infant required antibiotic therapy for an intercurrent infection. Infants were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg/kg twice daily of vancomycin; no details of the randomization were provided, and nursing staff but not physicians were blinded. The diagnostic criteria for sepsis and the usual treatment of suspected sepsis were not specified.
Spafford (1994) did not specify postnatal age, but it would appear that all the enrolled infants were less than 1000g at birth, with most infants being enrolled on day three or four of life. Infants had normal renal function, and a negative culture at the time of enrollment. There was no stratification. The treatment dose of vancomycin was 25 microg/ml of hyperalimentation fluid .There were no routine surveillance cultures and catheters were cultured on removal. Paired cultures were performed for suspected sepsis, but there is no description for sepsis apart from catheter related sepsis, which was defined as a colony count that was ten times greater from the catheter specimen than the peripheral specimen. Ampicillin and gentamicin were used for empiric therapy. Hearing screening was performed at hospital discharge.
Study outcomes include the incidence of sepsis, as well as the incidence of CONS sepsis. Mortality was assessed for each group, although most deaths were attributed to noninfectious etiologies.
Randomization: In four of the five studies, sealed envelopes with randomly allocated group assignments were utilized for determining treatment vs. control group. We assume therefore that the allocation was adequately masked for Baier (1998), Cooke (1997), Kacica (1994), and Spafford (1994). Moller (1993) gave no details of the randomization procedure.
Blinding to Treatment: Two of the five studies were blinded to treatment assignment (Baier (1998), Spafford (1994)). The study by Kacica (1994) was not blinded, nor was the study by Cooke (1997) which required intermittent administration of vancomycin. The study by Moller (1993) was apparently blinded to nursing and housestaff but not to attending physicians.
Exclusion After Randomization: No infants were excluded following randomization from the studies by Baier (1998), Moller (1993), or Spafford (1994). In the Cooke (1997) trial, 72 infants were enrolled; data were included on all infants although three infants from each group died within the first 16 days of life. Nine of the original 150 infants enrolled in the study by Kacica (1994) were excluded from analysis for a variety of reasons.
Blinding of the Outcome Assessment: It appears that only the two trials blinded to intervention (Baier (1998), Spafford (1994)) were blinded to outcome assessment as well, although this information was difficult to ascertain.
All five studies noted a decrease in the incidence of both overall sepsis events and coagulase negative staphylococcal (CoNS) sepsis events in neonates receiving prophylactic vancomycin.
Overall Sepsis
Each of the five trials reported the effect of prophylactic vancomycin
on the incidence of sepsis (all pathogens). In four of the five trials, there
was a significant reduction in sepsis in the treatment group. The study by
Cooke evaluated for number of positive blood cultures as opposed to number
of infants with sepsis and is therefore not included in the meta-analysis.
The study did however demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in
number of positive blood cultures in the treatment group (18 vs. 35). The
meta-analysis of the results demonstrates that overall sepsis incidence was
reduced significantly, RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05, 0.24.
CoNS Sepsis
Each of the five trials reported the effect of prophylactic vancomycin
on the incidence of CoNS sepsis. All five trials demonstrated a statistically
significant reduction in the incidence of CoNS sepsis. Kacica, however, evaluated
the number of positive blood cultures as opposed to the number of infants
with a positive blood culture for CoNS. For this reason, the data have not
been included in the meta-analysis although results from that study demonstrated
only one positive blood culture for CoNS in the treatment group as compared
to 37 positive blood cultures for CoNS in the control group. The meta-analysis
shows that the incidence of CoNS sepsis was reduced, RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19,
0.59.
The intermittent vancomycin regime appears to be less effective in reducing the number of infants with an episode of CoNS sepsis than the continuous infusion, RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27, 0.90 for intermittent dosing and RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.52 for continuous infusion.
Mortality Prior to Hospital Discharge
Four of the five studies reported on mortality prior to hospital discharge.
Individually, none of these studies demonstrated that mortality was affected
by vancomycin prophylaxis. The meta-analysis also reveals no evidence that
mortality was affected by vancomycin prophylaxis, 13/168 experimental patients
and 16/162 controls, RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.4, 1.58.
Length of NICU Stay
There was no evidence that length of NICU stay was affected as recorded in two studies (Spafford 1994; Moller 1993).
The length of stay was measured from hospital admission and was measured
in all trial participants. Spafford (1994) found length of stay to be 5 days
longer in the vancomycin treated infants, but the difference was not significant.
Moller reported only mean values for length of stay, 86 days in the vancomycin
group and 73 days in the control group; but without any reported measure
of variance, the significance of this difference cannot be assessed.
Total Vancomycin Exposure
The total vancomycin dose received was reported only by Moller (1993).
The dose received was 98.00 +/- 81.9 mg/patient for the experimental population
(n=21) and 114.18 +/- 60.9 mg/patient for the control population (n=20)
). These results were not statistically different. This finding may be due
to more frequent administration of vancomycin as therapy for suspected or
proven sepsis in the control population.
Hearing Impairment
Kacica (1994) and Spafford (1994) performed audiology screening prior
to discharge in all infants using auditory brainstem response systems. Kacica
(1994) noted that one infant in each group had "severe hearing impairment"
which remains undefined. Spafford (1994) noted that no treatment infants
but three controls had "significant hearing impairment", which is also undefined.
If it is assumed that these outcomes are comparable, there is no evidence
of a significant effect on the development of hearing impairment, RR 0.33,
95% CI 0.05, 2.07.
Serum Creatinine
Two studies reported serum creatinine during therapy. Spafford (1994)
stated that creatinine concentrations did not differ between the two groups
(80 micromol/L for the vancomycin group and 88 micromol/L for the control
group, no standard deviations reported). It was not stated when the measurements
were taken. Moller (1993) reported serum creatinine on day three of the study,
which was 57 micromol/L in each group; no standard deviation was noted. Kacica
(1994) estimated serum creatinine weekly during therapy and states there
were no differences between groups although no data were reported. Baier
(1998) states there were no changes in serum creatinine associated with the
use of vancomycin, but no methodology or results were given.
Development of Vancomycin Resistant Organisms
Kacica obtained skin and rectal specimens for surveillance cultures at
the time of enrollment and at termination of the protocol. The isolates were
screened for the presence of vancomycin resistant gram positive organisms.
The vancomycin susceptibility of gram positive blood culture isolates did
not vary during the study period: mean MIC 1.5 microg/mL, range 0.5 to 2.0
microg/mL. No vancomycin resistant isolates were detected in study patients,
although the data are not presented. There is insufficient evidence to ascertain
the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms at present.
Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Despite a planned analysis restricted to infants < 1000 g, there are
insufficient data available to determine either the number of infants less
than 1000 grams in these studies or the benefits of vancomycin prophylaxis
restricted to this particular patient population.
Five randomized trials were identified which compared prophylactic administration of vancomycin to no prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of neonatal nosocomial sepsis. Entry criteria were similar between the studies with four of five studies evaluating infants less than 1500 grams birth weight. Methodology also was similar; three of five studies administered vancomycin at a dose of 25 mcg/mL as a continuous infusion in the hyperalimentation for infants in the first two weeks of life. The remaining two studies administered 5 mg/kg twice daily. There were some differences in the definition of sepsis used, which is a recurring problem in studies of neonatal sepsis.
As many as 20% of infants weighing less than 1500 g have at least one episode of sepsis with a coagulase negative staphylococcus (as defined by a positive blood culture in the presence of clinical signs of infection) during their hospitalization, with rates reaching 54% during the first 37 days of life in infants weighing less than 1000 g (Johnson-Robbins 1996).
The majority of these infants are treated with vancomycin, as the sensitivity pattern usually shows resistance to other agents. Specifically, many hospital acquired CoNS are methicillin resistant. Thus many preterm infants experience substantial exposure to vancomycin. Newer alternatives such as teicoplanin (Moller 1997) are not currently widely used. The occurrence of CoNS sepsis in the neonate has also been associated with the need for possible removal of central venous catheters, and increased length of hospital stay (Stoll 1996).
Good outcome from very restricted use of vancomycin, where many infants with cultured CoNS sensitive only to vancomycin demonstrated clinical improvement without vancomycin therapy, has been reported (Matrai-Kovalskis 1998). This suggests that some infants with positive blood cultures may not have infection requiring therapy.
This review provides reasonably strong evidence for a significant decrease in the incidence of neonatal nosocomial sepsis and CoNS sepsis, using current clinical definitions of sepsis, following vancomycin prophylaxis. However, before such an approach is adopted as routine practice, vancomycin prophylaxis must be evaluated for its impact on vancomycin resistance for CoNS and other organisms (Barefield 1994) and for potential toxicity, as well as morbidity from CoNS sepsis. Vancomycin has a fairly broad spectrum of activity against Gram positive organisms. Exposing large numbers of infants to prolonged infusions of the drug, with excretion in the urine and stool, presumably may select for vancomycin resistant organisms. The NICU may become colonized with resistant organisms, such as vancomycin resistant enterococci, which may be very difficult to treat, and are associated with greater morbidity than CoNS.
Based on the studies reviewed, administration of prophylactic vancomycin has been found to reduce the incidence of sepsis, particularly CoNS sepsis. Current neonatal practice is to treat CoNS sepsis with antibiotics of variable duration and to consider removal of any indwelling central catheters. There is a suggestion that CoNS sepsis may not require specific therapy in all situations and thus the overall clinical benefit of preventing such episodes may include the decreased usage of potentially toxic drugs. However, further studies to evaluate the overall benefit, safety and cost effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis, including studies which evaluate the clinical significance of CoNS bacteremia, are warranted.
Since the original review was completed, there have been no additional randomized controlled trials of vancomycin prophylaxis in neonates. However, the United States Center for Disease Control commented on the use of vancomycin prophylaxis in their Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter Related Infections, 2002. While we are all in agreement that the randomized controlled trials of vancomycin prophylaxis demonstrated a reduction in catheter related bloodstream infection, the prophylactic use of vancomycin is a risk factor for the development of vancomycin resistant organisms. The risk of acquiring a resistant organism likely outweighs any benefit of prophylactic vancomycin (CDC 2002).
The use of prophylactic vancomycin in low doses reduces the incidence of nosocomial sepsis in the neonate, using currently accepted clinical definitions of sepsis. A continuous infusion of vancomycin appears to be more effective than intermittent dosing, although this may reflect methodology whereby blood cultures drawn from infants receiving continuous vancomycin contain enough of the drug to limit growth of vancomycin sensitive organisms. Although there is a concern regarding the theoretical development of resistant organisms with the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, there is insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of resistant organisms.
We believe that a prospective trial to further evaluate the role of prophylactic vancomycin or other agent may be helpful. Such a study should have adequate power combined with a rigorous study design. Attempts should be made to enroll infants less than 1000g, with indwelling catheters, which will increase the risk of nosocomial sepsis in the control population. Using a conservative estimate of nosocomial sepsis of 40% for this high risk population, with a power of 80%, and potential reductions in the incidence of sepsis in the treated group to 15%, 10% and 5%, the trial would require minimal sample sizes of 50, 35 and 22 infants per group. This trial should also evaluate safety with respect to potential oto- and nephrotoxicities.
There is a pressing need to determine the risk of the development of resistant organisms with low dose vancomycin prophylaxis. However, randomized trials to assess this outcome would require very much larger sample sizes and, indeed, may never achieve adequate power to evaluate this potential adverse effect; therefore, other research designs may be needed.
The true pathogenicity of CoNS in preterm infants with and without indwelling central catheters needs to be further evaluated in order to assess the true risk/benefit ratio of any intervention. There is a need to develop an acceptable clinical definition of CoNS sepsis.
Additional studies can address the use, safety, and efficacy of alternative antibiotics, such as teicoplanin (Moller 1997). Another approach that warrants further evaluation is the use of an antibiotic lock technique utilized at the time of tubing changes to the stopcock and catheter, an approach which avoids exposing the patient to any significant antibiotic concentrations (Carratala 1999). Perhaps most promising are studies in adults that have demonstrated that catheters impregnated with antibiotics and/or antibacterials may reduce nosocomial catheter related infections. These approaches may hold the greatest promise for reducing nosocomial infection in the preterm neonate and merit further study.
None
None
| Study | Methods | Participants | Interventions | Outcomes | Notes | Allocation concealment |
| Baier 1998 | Masking of allocation;yes. Masking of intervention; yes. Completeness of follow-up; yes. Masking of outcome assessment; yes. | 38 infants less than 1500g birth weight and less than 2 weeks of age requiring hyperalimentation. | Continuous infusion of hyperalimentation with either 25 microg/ml vancomycin or placebo | Bacteremia, defined as growth of an organism from 2 sites. Secondary outcomes included numbers of sepsis evaluations, mortality and bacteremia during hyperalimentation. | n= 38 | A |
| Cooke 1997 | Masking of allocation; yes. Masking of intervention; no. Completeness of follow-up; yes. Masking of outcome assessment; no. | 72 infants < 1500g, < 2 weeks, normal renal function receiving hyperalimentation | Twice daily vancomycin 5 mg/kg iv | CoNS bacteremia with and without elevated CRP, total sepsis, mortality | n=72 | A |
| Kacica 1994 | Masking of allocation; unclear. Masking of intervention; no. Completeness of follow-up; 9 infants not evaluated. Masking of outcome assessment; no. | 150 infants less than 1500g birth weight and less than 2 weeks of age requiring hyperalimentation. | Continuous infusion of hyperalimentation with either 25 microg/ml vancomycin or placebo | CoNS bacteremia. Secondary outcomes were total sepsis, mortality, hearing impairment | n=150 | A |
| Moller 1993 | Single center randomized controlled trial. Masking of allocation unclear; masking of intervention to nursing and housestaff but not to attending physicians. Completeness of follow up: yes. Masking of outcome assessment: no. | 41 preterm infants less than 1500 g | Vancomycin i.v. at 10 mg/kgday in two doses. | CoNS sepsis | A 3 phase "study", the middle phase of the study is a report of a randomized controlled trial n=41 | B |
| Spafford 1994 | Masking of allocation; yes. Masking of intervention; yes. Completeness of follow-up; yes. Masking of outcome assessment; yes. | 70 infants of < 1000g birthweight with central venous catheters less than 2 weeks of age. | Continuous infusion of hyperalimentation with either 25 microg/ml vancomycin or placebo | Colonization rate of central catheters Death, hospital stay, sepsis evaluations, brainstem auditory evoked responses | No specification of birthweight or gestation n=70 | A |
| Study | Reason for exclusion |
| Marchand 1990 | Randomized study which investigated pharyngeal instillation rather than systemic prophylaxis with vancomycin, and did not report results of CoNS sepsis episodes. Reduced airway colonization rates with CoNS were demonstrated. |
| Ocete 1998 | Comparison of sepsis rates after introducing routine low dose vancomycin prophylaxis, with rates in historical controls. Not restricted to very low birth weight infants. |
Baier RJ, Bocchini JA, Brown EG. Selective use of vancomycin to prevent coagulase negative staphylococcal nosocomial bacteremia in high risk very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:179-83.
Cooke 1997 {published data only}
Cooke RWI, Nycyk JA, Okuonghuae H, Shah V, Damjanovic V, Hart CA. Low dose vancomycin prophylaxis reduces coagulase negative staphylococcal bacteraemia in very low birthweight infants. J Hosp Infect 1997;37:297-303.
Kacica 1994 {published data only}
Kacica MA, Horgan MJ, Ochoa L, Sandler R, Lepow ML, Venezia RA. Prevention of gram positive sepsis in neonates weighing less than 1500 grams. J Pediatr 1994;125:253-8.
Moller 1993 {published data only}
Moller JC, Rossa M, Nachtrodt G, Richter A, Tegtmeyer FK. Praventive antibiotikagabe zur verhinderung nosokomialer septikamien bei sehr kleinen fruhgeborenen (VLBW Infants). Klin Padiatr. 1993;205:140-4.
Spafford 1994 {published data only}
Spafford PS, Sinkin RA, Cox C, Reubens L, Powell KR. Prevention of central venous catheter related coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. J Pediatr 1994;125:259-63.
Marchand S, Poisson D, Borderon JC, Gold F, Chantepie A, Saliba E, Laugier J. Randomized study of vancomycin pharyngeal instillation as a prophylaxis of bronchopulmonary infection in intubated neonates. Biol Neonate 1990;58:521-6.
Ocete 1998 {published data only}
Ocete E, Ruiz-Extremera A, Goicoechea A, Lozano E, Robles C, Rey ML, et al. Low-dosage prophylactic vancomycin in central-venous catheters for neonates. Early Hum Dev 1998;53:S181-6.
* indicates the primary reference for the study
Ballow M, Cates KL, et al. Development of the immune system in very low birth weight (less than 1500 g) premature infants: concentrations of plasma immunoglobulins and patterns of infections. Pediatr Res 1986;20:899-904.
Barefield ES, Philips JB. Vancomycin prophylaxis for coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. J Pediatr 1994;125:230-232.
Bhatt-Mehta V, Schumacher RE, Faix RG, Leady M, Brenner T. Lack of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in newborn infants: A case- control study. Pediatrics 1999;103:e48.
Carratala J, Niubo J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Juve E et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of an antibiotic-lock technique for prevention of gram-positive central venous catheter-related infection in neutropenic patients with cancer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:2200-04.
Center for Disease Control. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter related infections 2002. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 2002;51(RR-10):10.
Drossou V, Kanakoudi F, Tzimouli V, Sarafidis K, Taparkou A, Bougiouklis D, et al. Impact of prematurity, stress and sepsis on the neutrophil respiratory burst activity of neonates. Biol Neonate 1997;72:201-9.
Gaynes RP, Horan TC. Definitions of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall CG, editor(s). Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1995:Chap 77, Appendix A1.
Insoft RM, Sanderson IR, Walker WA. Development of immune function in the intestine and its role in neonatal diseases. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996;43:551-71.
Johnson-Robbins LA, El-Mohandes AE, Simmens SJ. Staphylococcus epidermidis sepsis in the intensive care nursery: a characterization of risk associations in infants <1,000 g. Biol Neonate 1996;69:249-56.
Kallman J, Schollin J, Schalen C, Erlandsson A, Kihlstrom E. Impaired phagocytosis and opsonisation towards group B streptococci in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78:F46-F50.
Matrai-Kovalskis Y, Greenberg D, Shinwell ES, Fraser D, Dagan R. Positive blood cultures for coagulase-negative staphylococci in neonates: does highly selective vancomycin usage affect outcome? Infection 1998;26:85-92.
Moller JC, Nelskamp I, Jensen R, Reiss I, Kohl M, Gatermann S, et al. Comparison of vancomycin and teicoplanin for prophylaxis of sepsis with coagulase negative staphylococci (CONS) in very low birth weight infants. J Perinat Med 1997;25:361-7.
Nataro JP, Corcoran L, Zirin S, et al. Prospective analysis of coagulase-negative staphylococcal infection in hospitalized infants. J Pediatr 1994;125:798-804.
Patrick CC. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Pathogens with increasing clinical significance. J Pediatr 1990;116:497-507.
Rutter N. The immature skin. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155(2 Suppl):S18-20.
Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB et al. Late onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: A report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1996;129:63-71.
Craft AP, Finer NN, Barrington KJ. Vancomycin for prophylaxis against sepsis in preterm neonates (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
01.01 Incidence of sepsis (all pathogens); number of patients with one or more episodes
01.02 Incidence of CoNS sepsis; number of patients with one or more episodes
01.03 Mortality prior to hospital discharge
01.04 Length of NICU stay (days)
01.05 Hearing impairment (auditory brainstem evoked response)
| Comparison or outcome | Studies | Participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Vancomycin versus control | ||||
| 01 Incidence of sepsis (all pathogens); number of patients with one or more episodes | 4 | 290 | RR (fixed), 95% CI | 0.11 [0.05, 0.24] |
| 02 Incidence of CoNS sepsis; number of patients with one or more episodes | 4 | 221 | RR (fixed), 95% CI | 0.33 [0.19, 0.59] |
| 03 Mortality prior to hospital discharge | 4 | 330 | RR (fixed), 95% CI | 0.79 [0.40, 1.58] |
| 04 Length of NICU stay (days) | 1 | 70 | WMD (fixed), 95% CI | 5.00 [-24.65, 34.65] |
| 05 Hearing impairment (auditory brainstem evoked response) | 2 | 211 | RR (fixed), 95% CI | 0.33 [0.05, 2.07] |
Dr Alissa P Craft
Phoenix Perinatal Associates
901 E. Willetta #3503
Phoenix
Arizona USA
85006
Telephone 1: 602-239-5166
Facsimile: 602-239-5295
E-mail: doc4preemies@aol.com
| This review is published as a Cochrane review in The
Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 2, 2004 (see www.CochraneLibrary.net for information).
Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response
to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted
for the most recent version of the Review. |
