![]() |
![]() |
REMARKS FOR
THE HONORABLE MARY PETERS
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION
FAA FORECAST CONFERENCE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
MARCH 10, 2008
NOON
Thank you, Bobby, for that kind introduction. And thank you all
for being here.
Before I begin my remarks on the forecast, I want to address media reports of
serious allegations that FAA inspectors knew about safety lapses and yet allowed
them to continue.
These stories raise questions about the safety of our aviation system. Let me
start by saying that the best way to measure the effectiveness of any safety
system is to closely examine the data you have available. And the data we have
today tells us that commercial aviation is safer than it has ever been before.
Indeed, the most recent data from the National Transportation Safety Board
showing that U.S. airlines has point one major accidents for every million hours
flown confirms that fact.
Yet as encouraging as the safety data is, these are significant allegations that
need to be addressed quickly and thoroughly. We take very seriously any
allegation – from within the FAA or outside the agency – that safety may have
been compromised.
That is why I have asked Acting FAA Administrator Sturgell and his entire
leadership team to get to the bottom of these allegations and find out if there
is any merit to them at all. If any inspector failed in his or her
responsibilities to the traveling public, they will be dealt with swiftly and
severely. There is simply no margin for error when it comes to the safety of our
aviation system.
Now, let me turn to the forecast.
At this point in the day, you have heard the numbers. We know the passengers are
coming – over 1 billion by 2016.
We know that, by 2025, revenue passenger miles are expected to more than double,
increasing by an average of 50 billion a year. That is the equivalent of adding
a carrier the size of Northwest to the system every 18 months.
We know that even with a slowing economy and record oil prices, we are looking
at passenger growth of 1.5 percent this year.
We also know that our aviation system is straining to handle the two million
passengers who already take to the skies on a daily basis.
Last year’s congested skies brought a 10 percent spike in delays. In pure
numbers, we are talking more than 540,000 flights that did not take off or land
on time. That is an all-time record, albeit a rather dubious record.
If you flew in 2007, there was better than a one-in-four chance your flight
arrived late. Even more troubling, the severity of the delays flyers faced was
unprecedented. Almost 1,600 flights took off more than three hours late. That is
up 24 percent from 2006.
As delays have increased, so too have consumer complaints. We heard from over
13,000 unhappy airline customers last year, and most complaints related to
flight problems – delays, cancellations, and missed connections.
Americans who lived through one of the worst travel seasons ever in 2007 might
look at our forecasts and fear new travel nightmares lie ahead. But I am here to
tell you that growth forecasts don’t have to mean worsening congestion and
lengthening delays for travelers.
I am here to offer a different forecast.
We can look forward to dependable flight schedules and on-time departures and
arrivals.
We can put an end to the added emissions, wasted fuel, and passenger headaches
that come from lengthy waits on the tarmac.
And we can have an aviation system that safely handles the growing numbers of
passengers who want to fly across the country and around the world.
Key to this forecast is unleashing the power of the market to better allocate
capacity and steer investment.
Pricing is the quickest and most effective approach to help spread flights
throughout the day and alleviate congestion at peak hours.
It can generate new revenues that airports can use to expand and accommodate the
forecasted passenger growth.
And properly pricing air traffic services to costs can help ensure the most
efficient use of existing airports, airfields, and airspace and provide the
surest path to expand capacity and put desperately needed technology in place.
There is nothing exotic about this approach. Phone and electric companies
balance supply and demand by adjusting their rates during peak usage hours. It
is the concept that led to free “nights and weekends” from cellular providers.
Airlines themselves smooth out peaks and valleys in demand by varying ticket
prices by time-of-day and day-of-week. Applying the same concept to the services
provided by airports and air traffic control has great potential to make today’s
broken system more predictable, reliable, and convenient for travelers.
Over a year ago, we sent Congress a comprehensive plan for transforming our
aviation system to meet today’s – and tomorrow’s – demands. A central reform was
the overhaul of the FAA's financing structure to provide price incentives for
system users to reduce delays and facilitate equipping our aviation system with
modern NextGen technology.
Our proposal features provisions to specifically target the most congested
regions with market-based mechanisms – such as congestion pricing and auctions –
to reduce airport delays and crowded airspace.
I stand ready to work with Congress to help pass an FAA reauthorization bill
that is consistent with the Administration’s proposed reforms. Gridlocked gates
underscore the need for a new way forward – replacing the status quo systems,
policies, and taxes that have produced the current congestion crisis.
Making flying a more pleasant experience for air travelers is a top priority for
President Bush and for me. Passengers don’t have the luxury of waiting on
Congress for relief, and we’re not waiting either.
We are moving key elements of the satellite-based NextGen system from design to
delivery this year.
Bobby spoke earlier of our efforts to accelerate NextGen. And I am announcing
today that we have selected Florida as the test-bed for this transformational
technology.
The Southeast has a good mix of traffic and a good mix of weather – just the
kind of place to put NextGen through the paces. Flying to the home of Tomorrow
Land doesn’t have to be a lesson in today’s traffic tie-ups. By putting the
latest technology in our towers instead of the state’s theme parks, we’re going
to make getting to and from Florida a model for the future.
Starting this summer, we are going to roll out NextGen technology at Daytona
Beach. In Miami, we will be employing a descent technique that saves fuel,
noise, and emissions.
The national debut of ADS-B technology – the backbone of NextGen – also will
begin in Florida. Adding ADS-B coverage in the Gulf will allow planes to fly
closer together without compromising safety. Today, we have to keep the planes
far apart – anywhere from 10 to 15 miles. But with ADS-B, we can reduce that
down to 5 miles, freeing up capacity.
NextGen is crucial to our long-term strategy for keeping up with forecasted
growth. We have also moved forward aggressively with short-term actions designed
to ease congestion and help passengers. These include a series of rules to
protect passengers and a new task force focused on helping airlines and airports
do a better job of coordinating with each other and taking care of passengers in
the event of lengthy ground delays.
We have had success with using military airspace for “Holiday Fast Lanes” at
Thanksgiving and Christmas, and are exploring a more permanent mechanism for
activating this option to ease back-ups.
Charles Everett is on the job as the acting Aviation Czar for the New York
region, the source of so many delays. He is helping to keep airspace redesign
and other operational improvements to reduce congestion and prevent delays on
track.
We could do more if Congress enacted the market-based reforms we proposed. But
even in the absence of legislation, we are pursuing changes to our policy on
landing fees designed to empower airports to take advantage of pricing to
encourage more efficient use of their airfields, reduce congestion, and attract
additional resources to expand capacity.
We know the aviation market responds to these types of price signals. In 1968,
the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey imposed a $25 minimum charge for
peak-hour use of runways at JFK, La Guardia, and Newark airports -- with an
almost immediate impact on congestion.
Our proposed policy changes signal congested airports that they can move away
from the decades-old practice of charging aircraft landing fees based solely on
the weight of the aircraft – a disincentive for flying larger planes, even when
these planes provide the most efficient utilization of the airport.
With this policy in effect, airports would be able to use pricing to spread
traffic more evenly throughout the day – or even among neighboring airports in
the same region –allowing them to serve more passengers, reduce delays, and
offer new options.
We are making tools available to bring airports and airlines together to address
delays. The alternative is to have the government intervene with the kind of
emergency action we were forced to take in the New York region.
Hourly limits on flights out of JFK go into effect later this month.
And today, I am announcing an agreement with the airlines serving Newark Liberty
Airport to temporarily cap flights at an average of 83 per hour during the peak
periods.
Even with the caps, we are putting market mechanisms in play. As capacity grows
at Newark and we are able to add slots, they will be auctioned. This auction
approach encourages competition, allows new entrants, and makes sure customers
get flights they truly value.
Let me be clear on one other point: We are not requiring service cuts. Airlines
will be able to shift their flights to times of the day when Newark has unused
capacity. Overall, the caps at Newark allow 30 more operations per day than were
offered last summer – just more reasonably spaced.
I want to thank the airlines for their cooperation in reaching this agreement.
Ultimately, however, these are not the kinds of negotiations we prefer to have.
But we have an obligation to travelers to do everything in our power to prevent
a repeat of the horrors they experienced last summer.
Ideally the problem of congestion would be tackled at the local level. Later
this week, I will sit down with the directors of the country’s most congested
airports to discuss how we can address the problem without the intervention of
the federal government. But if airports and airlines cannot manage congestion at
the local level, we will have to step in, because congestion in just a few
airports cascades across the continent.
I’ll give you an example. We had a ten-minute delay for 15 jets approaching
Newark one day last year. Within 20 minutes, another 250 aircraft – some as far
west as Chicago – were affected.
And if we remain on our current course – if we refuse to let the market work for
passengers – then we are guaranteed more Newarks and JFKs in our future.
I believe there is a better way – a way that will allow us to accommodate the
growth while we are modernizing our system without crippling congestion and
debilitating delays.
Market-based mechanisms can encourage airlines to spread out their flights more
evenly during the day, make better use of neighboring airports, and move the
maximum number of passengers on each flight.
The passengers are coming. Let’s make sure we are taking full advantage of the
most effective tools at our disposal to get them to their destinations smoothly,
safely, and on time.
Thank you.
# # #