Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).

BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES (95-660C & 95-797C)

Judge: 
Wiese
Date Filed: 
03/21/2003
Case Number: 
95-660C, 95-797C

Winstar: Contracts – (i) a Bank
Board resolution approving a holding company’s acquisition of a thrift
institution and granting the institution special regulatory capital accounting privileges constitutes a contract between the Bank Board and
the holding company where both the language of the resolution and
the parties’ preceding negotiations plainly evidence a bargained-for
promissory exchange; (ii) the contract, being intended for the direct
benefit of the thrift institution, is also enforceable by the institution as
a third-party beneficiary; and (iii) principals of the holding company who
agree to serve as guarantors of the holding company’s promise to maintain
the thrift institution’s regulatory capital levels are not parties to the
contract between the Bank Board and the holding company because they
lack any direct and immediate stake in the contemplated performance and
are not identified as contract parties

AttachmentSize
Winstar: Contracts (i) a Bank Board resolution approving a holding companys acquisition of a thrift institution and granting the institution special regulatory capital accounting privileges constitutes a contract between the Bank Board and the holding co73.16 KB