Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 88* 99 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 101 116* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 96* 107* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 94* 105* Bloomington, IN....................... 90* 98 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 101 116* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 112* 122* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 76* 87* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 101* 101 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 91* 106* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 102 115* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 108* 115* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 97* 104 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 101 107 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 99 116* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87* 99 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97* 111* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 97* 112* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 103* 112* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 105* 109* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95* 111* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 101* 106* Great Falls, MT....................... 88* 92* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 94* 102 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 93* 109* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 113* 125* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 95* 105* Honolulu, HI.......................... 104* 120* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 95* 111* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 96* 103 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 96* 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 88* 83* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 108* 93* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 99 87* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 101 95* Bloomington, IN....................... 97 84* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 108* 99 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 115* 109* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 93* 73* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 100 104* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 98 82* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 98 97 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 114* 102 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 105 98 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 105 97 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 100 97 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 95* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 105 89* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 99 92* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 106* 102 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 110* 99 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 103 92* Great Falls, MT....................... 81* 92* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 100 91* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 95 93* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 115* 116* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 90* 88* Honolulu, HI.......................... 106* 109* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 103 82* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 100 94* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 103 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86* 90* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 92* 108* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 99 98* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 91* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 79* 93* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 94* 99 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 101 118* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 65* 79* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 97* 101 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 92* 96* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 107 105* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 104 112* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 87* 99 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93* 104* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 100 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 88* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 96 101 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 92* 94* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 100 105* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 94 107* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90* 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 105* Great Falls, MT....................... 86* 85* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 82* 98* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 83* 96* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 102 115* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 87* 98* Honolulu, HI.......................... 103 98 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 91* 100 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 97 95* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 90* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 68* 86* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 76* 101 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 73* 106* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 72* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 64* 82* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 90* 94 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 105 116* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 55* 87* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 96 106* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 66* 83* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 75* 100 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 111* 113* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 76* 100 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 86* 103 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 83* 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 79* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 75* 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 86* 101 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 78* 109* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 85* 99 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96 90* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 88* 106* Great Falls, MT....................... 93* 94* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 74* 93* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 67* 85* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 97 113 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 86* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 97 108* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 75* 93* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 75* 92* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 81* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 94* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 103 108 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 95* 94* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 87* 97* Bloomington, IN....................... 96* 107* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 108* 106* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 107* 114* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 76* 76* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 107* 104* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 101 104* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 101 101 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 104 107* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 99 101 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 103 107* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 95 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 87* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90* 99 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 105* 104* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 99 105* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 116* 111* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96* 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 112* Great Falls, MT....................... 99 98 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 101 104* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 105* 95* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 111* 110* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 99 103* Honolulu, HI.......................... 109 102 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 101 95 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 100 97 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 105* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 97* 114* Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 89* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 98 102 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 103* 108* Knoxville, TN......................... 92* 116* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 94* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 107* 121* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 95* 101 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 95* 108* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 98* 116* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 101 111* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 109* 124* Mobile, AL............................ 89* 87* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 98* 101 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 115* 129* Ocala, FL............................. 90* 90 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 90* 96 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 91* 103 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 94* 96* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 105* 119* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 98 115* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 96* 106 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 104* 112* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 109* 119* Reading, PA........................... 102* 124* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 97* 106* Richmond, VA.......................... 98* 110* Rochester, NY......................... 97* 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 98* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 98 96* Johnstown, PA......................... 90* 84* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 93* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 101 110* Knoxville, TN......................... 105 79* Lincoln, NE........................... 90* 88* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 113* 105* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 97 99 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 94* 84* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 103 96* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 102 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 111* 111* Mobile, AL............................ 87* 82* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 106* 91* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 123* 111* Ocala, FL............................. 87* 89* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93* 87* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 90* 91 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 92* 97 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 114* 101 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 107 95* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 100 92* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 103 107* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 119* 111* Reading, PA........................... 98 96* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 100 94* Richmond, VA.......................... 101 94* Rochester, NY......................... 102 102 Rockford, IL.......................... 103 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 89* 100 Johnstown, PA......................... 82* 86* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 95 101 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 97* 102* Knoxville, TN......................... 94* 97* Lincoln, NE........................... 80* 90* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 109* 110* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 95* 98* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 95* 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 91* 100 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 100 106* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 104 107* Mobile, AL............................ 90* 95* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 97* 101 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 110* 118* Ocala, FL............................. 89* 93* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85* 91* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 96 90* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 91* 90* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 94* 109* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 101 101 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 86* 100 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 108* 108* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 97* 109* Reading, PA........................... 101 104* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 99 99 Richmond, VA.......................... 91* 104* Rochester, NY......................... 92* 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 94* 98* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 87* 103 Johnstown, PA......................... 81* 90* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 86 100 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 91* 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 69* 86* Lincoln, NE........................... 71* 95* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 94 111* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 90* 94* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 79* 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 78* 97 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 92 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 94 105 Mobile, AL............................ 77* 99 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 78* 94* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 112* 116* Ocala, FL............................. 68* 107* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87* 108* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 76* 92 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 78* 104 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90* 113* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 69* 104 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 82* 98 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 97 112* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 95* 112* Reading, PA........................... 86* 109* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 79* 110* Richmond, VA.......................... 77* 102 Rochester, NY......................... 83* 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 90* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 100 100 Johnstown, PA......................... 84* 88* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 105 99 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 96* 106* Knoxville, TN......................... 88* 98 Lincoln, NE........................... 89* 95* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 100 106* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 99 93* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 96* 97* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 94* 103 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 103 107* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 114* 110* Mobile, AL............................ 92* 103* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 100 106* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 105* 112* Ocala, FL............................. 91* 105* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85* 85* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 85 109 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 106* 108* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 106 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 96 102 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 97 97 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 99 101 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 110* 108* Reading, PA........................... 101 101 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 96* 100 Richmond, VA.......................... 101 102 Rochester, NY......................... 98* 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 101 104* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 108* 116* Salinas, CA........................... 114* 128* San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 105* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 109* 121* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 119* 126* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 110* 115* Springfield, MA....................... 110* 113* Springfield, MO....................... 88* 94* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 102 108* Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 94* 101 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91* 96* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 98* 119* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 108* 117* York-Hanover, PA...................... 97* 118* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 96* 111* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 117* 108* Salinas, CA........................... 127* 113* San Antonio, TX....................... 98 84* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 116* 111* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 125* 119* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 108* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 119* 103 Springfield, MO....................... 92* 83* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106* 93* Tallahassee, FL....................... 91* 92* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 90* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 96 90* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 110 97 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 117* 102 York-Hanover, PA...................... 105 94* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 99 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 99 109* Salinas, CA........................... 122* 116* San Antonio, TX....................... 92* 93* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 100 109* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 118* 124* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 108* 108* Springfield, MA....................... 105* 113* Springfield, MO....................... 87* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 92* 102 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87* 93 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 99 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88* 94* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 94* 100 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 101 115* York-Hanover, PA...................... 86* 99* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 82* 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 86* 116* Salinas, CA........................... 106 108* San Antonio, TX....................... 82* 103 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 94 110* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 104 116* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 93* 108* Springfield, MA....................... 92* 105 Springfield, MO....................... 65* 88* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 102 112* Tallahassee, FL....................... 68* 89* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 82* 95 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 71* 95* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 75* 91* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 84* 115* York-Hanover, PA...................... 84* 100 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 80* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 113* 111* Salinas, CA........................... 101 106* San Antonio, TX....................... 97* 90* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 104 103 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 107 111* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 116* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 108* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 92* 99 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105 112* Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 95* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 104 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91* 91* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 103* 95* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 106* 108* York-Hanover, PA...................... 96* 106* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 100 112* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.