Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80* 86* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 92* 101 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 87* 93* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 85* 91* Bloomington, IN....................... 82* 85* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 91* 100 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 102 105* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 69* 75* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 92* 87* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 83* 92* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 93* 99 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 98 100 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 88* 90* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 91* 93 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 90* 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 79* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 88* 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 88* 97 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 93* 97 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 96* 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86* 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 92* 92* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 91* 87* Great Falls, MT....................... 80* 80* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 86* 88* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 84* 95* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 102 108* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 86* 91* Honolulu, HI.......................... 94* 104 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 86* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81* 73* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 100 81* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 92* 76* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 93* 83* Bloomington, IN....................... 90* 73* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 100 87* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 106* 96* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 86* 64* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 92* 91* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 90* 72* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 90* 85* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 106* 90* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 97 86* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 97 85* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 93* 85* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88* 70* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 78* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 92* 81* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 98 90* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 102 87* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89* 82* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95* 80* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 92* 88* Great Falls, MT....................... 75* 81* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 92* 80* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 87* 81* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 106* 102 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 83* 77* Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 95* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 95* 72* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80* 83* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 85* 100 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 92* 91* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 84* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 73* 86* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 87* 91* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 94 109* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 61* 73* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 90* 93* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 86* 88* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 99 97 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 97 104* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 81* 92* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 87* 96* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 93 93* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 77* 82* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 89* 94* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 86* 87* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 93 97 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 87* 99 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 83* 87* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 93* 97* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 93* 92* Great Falls, MT....................... 80* 78* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 76* 91* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 77* 88* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 95 106* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 80* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 90* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 84* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73* 79* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 82* 94 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 79* 98 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 78* 89* Bloomington, IN....................... 69* 76* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 96 87* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 113* 108 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 60* 80* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 104 99 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 71* 77* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 81* 93* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 119* 105 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 82* 93* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93 95 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 90* 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 85* 74* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81* 90* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 92* 93* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 84* 101 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 92* 91* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 103 83* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95 98 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 108* 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 100 87* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 80* 86* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 72* 79* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 104 104 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 92* 83* Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 100 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 81* 86* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 78* 82* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 89* 95 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 82* 82* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 75* 85* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 94* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 93* 93* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 93* 100 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 65* 67* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 92* 92* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 87* 91* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 87* 89* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 89* 94* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 86* 89* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 89* 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 82* 88* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 78* 77* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 78* 87* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 91* 92* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 85* 92* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 100 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 82* 89* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 85* 98 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 86* 88* Great Falls, MT....................... 85* 86* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 87* 91* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 90* 83* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 96 96 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 86* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 94 90* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 87* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 87* 89* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 87* 77* Iowa City, IA......................... 88* 99 Johnstown, PA......................... 78* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89* 89* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 93* 94 Knoxville, TN......................... 84* 100 Lincoln, NE........................... 80* 82* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 97* 105 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 86* 88* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 86* 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 89* 101 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 92* 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 99 108 Mobile, AL............................ 81* 76* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 89* 88* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 104* 112* Ocala, FL............................. 81* 78* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82* 83* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 83* 89 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 85* 83* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 95* 103 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 89* 100 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 87* 92* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 95* 97 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 99 103 Reading, PA........................... 92* 107* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 88* 92* Richmond, VA.......................... 89* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 93* 82* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 95* 79* Iowa City, IA......................... 90* 84* Johnstown, PA......................... 83* 73* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 82* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 94* 96* Knoxville, TN......................... 97 70* Lincoln, NE........................... 83* 77* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 105* 92* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 89* 87* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 86* 74* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 95* 84* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 94* 84* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 102 98 Mobile, AL............................ 81* 72* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 98 79* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 114* 97 Ocala, FL............................. 81* 78* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 86* 76* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 83* 79* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 85* 85* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 105* 88* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 99 83* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 93* 81* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 95* 94* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 110* 97 Reading, PA........................... 90* 84* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 93* 82* Richmond, VA.......................... 93* 82* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 90* 88* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 83* 91* Iowa City, IA......................... 83* 93* Johnstown, PA......................... 76* 80* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 88* 93* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 90* 94* Knoxville, TN......................... 88* 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 74* 83* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 101 101 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 88* 91* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 89* 93* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 85* 92* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 93 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 97 99 Mobile, AL............................ 84* 87* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 90* 94* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 102 109* Ocala, FL............................. 82* 86* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 79* 84* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 89* 83* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 85* 83* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 87* 101 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 94 93* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 80* 92* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 101 100 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 90* 101 Reading, PA........................... 94* 96* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 92* 92* Richmond, VA.......................... 84* 96* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 81* 85* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 87* 89* Iowa City, IA......................... 94* 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 93 93 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 98 90* Knoxville, TN......................... 74* 80* Lincoln, NE........................... 76* 88* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 101 103 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 97 87* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 85* 93* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 84* 90* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 101 97 Mobile, AL............................ 83* 92* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 84* 87* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 121* 107* Ocala, FL............................. 73* 100 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93 100 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 82* 86* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 83* 97 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 105 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 75* 96 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 88* 91* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 105 104 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 102 104 Reading, PA........................... 93* 101 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 86* 102 Richmond, VA.......................... 83* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 86* 85* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 91* 87* Iowa City, IA......................... 86* 88* Johnstown, PA......................... 72* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 90 87* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 83* 93* Knoxville, TN......................... 75* 86* Lincoln, NE........................... 76* 83* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 86* 93* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 85* 82* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 83* 86* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 81* 90* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 89* 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 98 96 Mobile, AL............................ 79* 91* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 86* 94* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 91* 99 Ocala, FL............................. 79* 93* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 73* 75* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 73* 96 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 91* 95* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 85* 93 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 83* 90* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 84* 85* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 85* 89* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 95 95* Reading, PA........................... 87* 89* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 83* 88* Richmond, VA.......................... 87* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rochester, NY......................... 88* 86* Rockford, IL.......................... 89* 86* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 98 100 Salinas, CA........................... 103* 111* San Antonio, TX....................... 83* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 99 105 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 108* 109* Springfield, MA....................... 100 98 Springfield, MO....................... 80* 81* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93* 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85* 88* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 83* 83* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 89* 104 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 98 102 York-Hanover, PA...................... 88* 103 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 87* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rochester, NY......................... 94* 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 95* 83* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 108* 94* Salinas, CA........................... 117* 99 San Antonio, TX....................... 90* 73* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 107* 97 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 116* 105* Springfield, MA....................... 110* 90* Springfield, MO....................... 85* 73* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 81* Tallahassee, FL....................... 84* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 79* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 89* 79* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 101 85* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 108* 89* York-Hanover, PA...................... 97 83* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 91* 78* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rochester, NY......................... 86* 92* Rockford, IL.......................... 87* 91* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 92 100 Salinas, CA........................... 114* 107* San Antonio, TX....................... 85* 86* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 93 100 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 109* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 97 105* Springfield, MO....................... 81* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 85* 94* Tallahassee, FL....................... 81* 86* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86* 92* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 82* 87* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 87* 93* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 94 106* York-Hanover, PA...................... 80* 91* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 76* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rochester, NY......................... 89* 82* Rockford, IL.......................... 97 93* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 92 108* Salinas, CA........................... 114* 100 San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 96 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 101 102 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 112* 107 Springfield, MA....................... 99 97 Springfield, MO....................... 70* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 109* 104 Tallahassee, FL....................... 73* 82* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 89* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 76* 88* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 80* 84* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 91* 107* York-Hanover, PA...................... 90* 92* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 86* 88* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rochester, NY......................... 84* 88* Rockford, IL.......................... 87* 91* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 97 97 Salinas, CA........................... 87* 93* San Antonio, TX....................... 83* 79* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 90* 90* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 92 97 Springfield, MA....................... 93* 101 Springfield, MO....................... 79* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90* 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 79* 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 79* 91* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 78* 80* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 88* 84* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 91* 95 York-Hanover, PA...................... 82* 93* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 86* 99 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.