Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80* 91* Anchorage, AK......................... 100 101 Atlanta, GA........................... 93* 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86* 87* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 87* 88* Birmingham, AL........................ 86* 89* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 86* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 103* 107* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 71* 71* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 92* 89* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 85* 95* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 92* 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 99 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 90* 91* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 92* 93 Columbus, OH.......................... 91* 97 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80* 89* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90* 97 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 90* 96* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 93* 96 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 97* 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88* 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 91* 91* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 92* 90* Great Falls, MT....................... 80* 82* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87* 89* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86* 92* Hartford, CT.......................... 102 105 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 87* 86* Honolulu, HI.......................... 96* 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 88* 97 Huntsville, AL........................ 88* 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85* 73* Anchorage, AK......................... 101 102 Atlanta, GA........................... 103 82* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 101 76* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 96* 78* Birmingham, AL........................ 96* 85* Bloomington, IN....................... 97 76* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109* 95* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 96* 64* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 92* 90* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 95* 73* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93* 83* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108* 90* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 87* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 102 82* Columbus, OH.......................... 93* 85* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 95* 70* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 81* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 93* 81* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103 83* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 105* 85* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95* 81* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96* 79* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 88* Great Falls, MT....................... 76* 79* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 95* 80* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91* 82* Hartford, CT.......................... 109* 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 90* 76* Honolulu, HI.......................... 105* 93* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 73* Huntsville, AL........................ 97 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81* 80* Anchorage, AK......................... 97 98 Atlanta, GA........................... 88* 97 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 75* 89* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90* 90* Birmingham, AL........................ 85* 89* Bloomington, IN....................... 70* 81* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 95 105* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 67* 71* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95 92* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 91* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 95* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85* 91* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 86* 94* Columbus, OH.......................... 95 92* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 79* 78* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93* 92* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 87* 85* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 93 95* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 91* 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86* 85* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95 94* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 79* 75* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 78* 90* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 82* 87* Hartford, CT.......................... 97 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 82* 88* Honolulu, HI.......................... 94 92* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86* 91* Huntsville, AL........................ 90* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 74* 76* Anchorage, AK......................... 113* 104 Atlanta, GA........................... 84* 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86* 91* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 79* 93* Birmingham, AL........................ 76* 93* Bloomington, IN....................... 70* 80* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112* 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 61* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 94* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 72* 77* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 83* 92* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 107* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 81* 92* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 91 96 Columbus, OH.......................... 88* 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 76* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81* 90* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 90* 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 82* 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 99 91* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 87* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89* 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 95 90* Great Falls, MT....................... 107* 94* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 82* 92* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 74* 79* Hartford, CT.......................... 103 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88* 86* Honolulu, HI.......................... 101 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 82* 90* Huntsville, AL........................ 82* 85* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 76* 82* Anchorage, AK......................... 98 97 Atlanta, GA........................... 88* 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84* 85* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80* 81* Birmingham, AL........................ 74* 87* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 92* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 92* 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 64* 68* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95 90* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 86* 93* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 88* 88* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 88* 94* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85* 88* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 89* 94* Columbus, OH.......................... 82* 90* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 76* 76* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 77* 88* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91* 93* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 88* 87* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 83* 90* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 81* 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 86* 89* Great Falls, MT....................... 82* 81* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 86* 92* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89* 85* Hartford, CT.......................... 95 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 91 92* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 85* 84* Huntsville, AL........................ 85* 83* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 89* 79* Iowa City, IA......................... 90* 92* Johnstown, PA......................... 80* 84* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 90* Knoxville, TN......................... 85* 100 Lincoln, NE........................... 81* 82* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 98* 103 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 88* 88* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 85* 82* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 87* 93* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 88* 104 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 93* 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 99 Mobile, AL............................ 81* 79* New Orleans, LA....................... 87* 87* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 104* 111* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84* 84* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 85* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83* 85* Orlando, FL........................... 85* 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 97* 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89* 96 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 88* 89* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 96* 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 99 106* Reading, PA........................... 93* 102 Reno, NV.............................. 90* 95* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 95* 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 90* 95* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 87* Rockford, IL.......................... 92* 88* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 97* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 98 82* Iowa City, IA......................... 96* 86* Johnstown, PA......................... 92* 75* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96* 81* Knoxville, TN......................... 99 71* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 77* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110* 92* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96* 87* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 82* 85* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 93* 77* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 96* 81* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 85* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 105* 100 Mobile, AL............................ 86* 71* New Orleans, LA....................... 97* 77* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 117* 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 90* 80* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 77* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85* 77* Orlando, FL........................... 89* 79* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108* 89* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 81* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 98 83* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 96* 94* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112* 95* Reading, PA........................... 94* 85* Reno, NV.............................. 96* 84* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96* 95* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 96* 83* Rochester, NY......................... 98 88* Rockford, IL.......................... 98 83* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 108* 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 86* 91* Iowa City, IA......................... 83* 94* Johnstown, PA......................... 77* 78* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 87* 92* Knoxville, TN......................... 88* 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 81* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 103 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89* 91* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86* 83* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94* 91* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 86* 90* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 92 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 98 96* Mobile, AL............................ 85* 83* New Orleans, LA....................... 91* 89* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 101 106* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84* 85* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 82* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84* 83* Orlando, FL........................... 91 84* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90* 98 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 96 94* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 80* 90* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 99 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 92* 98 Reading, PA........................... 96 95* Reno, NV.............................. 91* 92* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 94* 93* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 89* 91* Rochester, NY......................... 86* 91* Rockford, IL.......................... 90* 90* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 91 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 83* 90* Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 96 Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 98 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 76* 82* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 100 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 88* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 83* 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 85* 92* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 81* 88* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 102 101 Mobile, AL............................ 84* 92* New Orleans, LA....................... 81* 86* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 115* 107* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 78* 88* Ocala, FL............................. 74* 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 101 Orlando, FL........................... 82* 88* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 74* 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87* 90* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 103 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 93* 101 Reading, PA........................... 91* 94* Reno, NV.............................. 87* 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 88* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 83* 93* Rochester, NY......................... 84* 84* Rockford, IL.......................... 100 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 92 111* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 92* 88* Iowa City, IA......................... 86* 85* Johnstown, PA......................... 72* 73* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89* 86* Knoxville, TN......................... 75* 85* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 81* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 84* 91* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 85* 83* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89* 91* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83* 85* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 82* 87* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 90* 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 95 Mobile, AL............................ 82* 81* New Orleans, LA....................... 81* 89* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 89* 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 80* 79* Ocala, FL............................. 81* 91* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 75* 77* Orlando, FL........................... 73* 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 85* 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 82* 89* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84* 85* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 86* 89* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 95 93* Reading, PA........................... 85* 91* Reno, NV.............................. 84* 90* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 83* 89* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 86* 89* Rochester, NY......................... 85* 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 88* 92* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 94 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Salinas, CA........................... 104* 112* San Antonio, TX....................... 82* 90* San Diego, CA......................... 99 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 109* 111* Springfield, MA....................... 100 101 Springfield, MO....................... 80* 80* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93* 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83* 79* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 87* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 91* 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 98 100 York, PA.............................. 89* 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Salinas, CA........................... 122* 97 San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 74* San Diego, CA......................... 111* 95* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 118* 103 Springfield, MA....................... 110* 89* Springfield, MO....................... 89* 71* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 79* Tallahassee, FL....................... 91* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 80* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99 85* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 108* 90* York, PA.............................. 99 83* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94* 77* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Salinas, CA........................... 116* 103* San Antonio, TX....................... 76* 85* San Diego, CA......................... 96 98 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111* 113* Springfield, MA....................... 102 103* Springfield, MO....................... 82* 80* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90* 92* Tallahassee, FL....................... 83* 84* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 92* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92* 90* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 96 103 York, PA.............................. 82* 88* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 83* 86* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Salinas, CA........................... 119* 104 San Antonio, TX....................... 87* 91* San Diego, CA......................... 96 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110* 110* Springfield, MA....................... 95 103 Springfield, MO....................... 69* 85* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 79* 82* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 88* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 83* 88* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 90* 109* York, PA.............................. 92* 93* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Salinas, CA........................... 81* 92* San Antonio, TX....................... 81* 76* San Diego, CA......................... 89* 89* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 92* 96 Springfield, MA....................... 92* 102 Springfield, MO....................... 80* 79* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 88* 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 80* 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 79* 91* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 89* 86* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 92* 94* York, PA.............................. 82* 91* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87* 98 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.