Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 114 Anchorage, AK......................... 113* 127* Atlanta, GA........................... 105* 125* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 98 109 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 98 111 Birmingham, AL........................ 97* 112 Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 109 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 116* 135* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 81* 89 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 104* 112 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 96* 119* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 104* 122* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 128* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 101 114 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 104* 118* Columbus, OH.......................... 103 123* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90* 112 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 101 122* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 102 121* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 105* 121* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 109* 119* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 117* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 103* 115 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 104* 113 Great Falls, MT....................... 90* 104 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 112 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 97* 116* Hartford, CT.......................... 116* 133* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 98 108 Honolulu, HI.......................... 108* 129* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 122* Huntsville, AL........................ 99 116 Iowa City, IA......................... 101 116 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87* 89* Anchorage, AK......................... 103 125* Atlanta, GA........................... 105* 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 103 92* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 96 Birmingham, AL........................ 98 104 Bloomington, IN....................... 99 93* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 111* 116* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 98 79* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93* 109* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 97 89* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 95 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 110* 110* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 101 106* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 104 101 Columbus, OH.......................... 95 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 96* 85* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 104 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 95* 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 105* 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 107* 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97* 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 100 108* Great Falls, MT....................... 78* 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 97* 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 92* 100 Hartford, CT.......................... 111* 123* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 91* 93* Honolulu, HI.......................... 107* 113* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 100 90* Huntsville, AL........................ 98 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 98 105* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 94 88* Anchorage, AK......................... 114* 107* Atlanta, GA........................... 102 106* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 87* 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 105 98 Birmingham, AL........................ 99 97 Bloomington, IN....................... 82* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 111* 115* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 79* 78* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 110* 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 106 95* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 114* 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 111* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 99 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 103 Columbus, OH.......................... 111 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 108 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 102 93* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 109 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106 107* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 111* 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 114* 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 92* 82* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 91* 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 114* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 96 97 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110* 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 100 100 Huntsville, AL........................ 105 97 Iowa City, IA......................... 97 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 85* Anchorage, AK......................... 135* 116* Atlanta, GA........................... 100 107* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 103 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 94 104 Birmingham, AL........................ 91* 104 Bloomington, IN....................... 84* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 134* 121* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 73* 82* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 119* 105 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 99 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 134* 120* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 97 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 109 107* Columbus, OH.......................... 105 105 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 99 84* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 108* 111* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 99 110* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 118* 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 118* 97 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 107 109* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 114* 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 128* 105 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89* 88* Hartford, CT.......................... 123* 113 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 106 96 Honolulu, HI.......................... 121* 121* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 98 100 Huntsville, AL........................ 98 95 Iowa City, IA......................... 109* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82* 93* Anchorage, AK......................... 106 111* Atlanta, GA........................... 95 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 91* 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 86* 92* Birmingham, AL........................ 80* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 90* 105 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 112* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 70* 77* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 103 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94* 106 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 96 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 107 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92* 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97 107 Columbus, OH.......................... 89* 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 82* 87* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 84* 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 109* 110* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90* 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 88* 113* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 94* 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 89* 93* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 94* 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 103 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 92* 103 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 92* 96 Huntsville, AL........................ 92* 94 Iowa City, IA......................... 93* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 90* 106 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 102 114 Knoxville, TN......................... 96* 126* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 104 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110* 129* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 100 111 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96* 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 98 117* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 131* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 106* 123* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 111* 124* Mobile, AL............................ 91* 99 New Orleans, LA....................... 98 110 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 118* 140* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94* 106 Ocala, FL............................. 93* 107 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94* 107 Orlando, FL........................... 96 116 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 130* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 100 122* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 100 112 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 108* 127* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112* 134* Reading, PA........................... 105* 129* Reno, NV.............................. 102 119* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 107* 117* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 101 120* Rochester, NY......................... 101 110 Rockford, IL.......................... 103* 110 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 110* 125* Salinas, CA........................... 117* 141* San Antonio, TX....................... 92* 114 San Diego, CA......................... 112* 130* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 93* 92* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 97 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 100 87* Lincoln, NE........................... 90* 93* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 112* 112* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 98 107* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 84* 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 95* 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 97 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 107* 122* Mobile, AL............................ 88* 86* New Orleans, LA....................... 99 93* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 119* 118* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 92* 97 Ocala, FL............................. 90* 94* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87* 94* Orlando, FL........................... 90* 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 110* 108* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 104 99 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 99 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97 115* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 114* 116* Reading, PA........................... 96* 104 Reno, NV.............................. 97 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 98 116* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 98 101 Rochester, NY......................... 100 107* Rockford, IL.......................... 99 102 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 109* 115* Salinas, CA........................... 124* 118* San Antonio, TX....................... 93* 90* San Diego, CA......................... 113* 116* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 90* 86* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 101 101 Knoxville, TN......................... 103 96* Lincoln, NE........................... 90* 88* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 121* 108* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 104 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 101 90* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 110* 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 107 106* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 115* 105* Mobile, AL............................ 100 91* New Orleans, LA....................... 106 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 118* 116* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 98 93* Ocala, FL............................. 97 90* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 98 91* Orlando, FL........................... 106 92* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106 108* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 112* 103 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 94 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 116* 107* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 108* 107* Reading, PA........................... 112* 104* Reno, NV.............................. 106 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 110* 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 104 100 Rochester, NY......................... 101 99 Rockford, IL.......................... 105 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 107 105* Salinas, CA........................... 136* 113* San Antonio, TX....................... 89* 93* San Diego, CA......................... 112* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 104 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 117* 109 Knoxville, TN......................... 91* 91* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 118* 111* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 118* 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 100 106 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 102 103 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 98 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 119* 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 122* 112 Mobile, AL............................ 101 102 New Orleans, LA....................... 97 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 138* 120* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94 98 Ocala, FL............................. 89* 111* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 109* 113* Orlando, FL........................... 98 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 115* 117* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 88 105 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 104 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 123* 116* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112* 113* Reading, PA........................... 110* 105 Reno, NV.............................. 104 116* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 120* 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 99 104 Rochester, NY......................... 101 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 120* 109* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 111* 124* Salinas, CA........................... 142* 116* San Antonio, TX....................... 104 101 San Diego, CA......................... 115* 112* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 78* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 82* 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 93* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 91* 104 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92* 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 97 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 90* 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89* 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 107* 108* Mobile, AL............................ 88* 92* New Orleans, LA....................... 88* 102 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 97 111* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 90* Ocala, FL............................. 87* 104 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82* 88* Orlando, FL........................... 79* 107 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92* 109* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89* 102 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 91* 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 93* 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 107* Reading, PA........................... 92* 103 Reno, NV.............................. 91* 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 90* 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 92* 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 95* 105 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 109* Salinas, CA........................... 88* 105 San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 87* San Diego, CA......................... 96 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123* 140* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 113* 126* Springfield, MA....................... 113* 128* Springfield, MO....................... 90* 101 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105* 119* Tallahassee, FL....................... 94* 99 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 98 110 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 102 124* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 111* 126* York, PA.............................. 100 125* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 100 118* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 120* 126* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 102 122* Springfield, MA....................... 112* 109* Springfield, MO....................... 91* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 101 97 Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 99 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 101 104 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 110* 109* York, PA.............................. 101 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 96* 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 130* 124* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 117* 110* Springfield, MA....................... 119* 112* Springfield, MO....................... 96 88* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 97 92* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 104 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 107* 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 112* 113* York, PA.............................. 95 96* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 97 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 131* 123* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 120* 112* Springfield, MA....................... 113* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 83* 95 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 127* 112* Tallahassee, FL....................... 95 91* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 104 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 100 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107 122* York, PA.............................. 110* 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 107 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 100 116* Springfield, MO....................... 86* 90* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 110 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87* 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86* 104 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 97 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 107 York, PA.............................. 88* 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94* 112* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.