Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90* 94* Anchorage, AK......................... 112* 105 Atlanta, GA........................... 104* 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 96* 90* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97* 91* Birmingham, AL........................ 96* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 92* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114* 110* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 80* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 102* 92* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 95* 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 103 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 111* 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 94 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 103 97 Columbus, OH.......................... 102 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 89* 92* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 100 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 104* 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 108* 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 102 95* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 103* 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 89* 85* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 98* 92* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96* 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 109* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 97* 89* Honolulu, HI.......................... 107* 106 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 98 100 Huntsville, AL........................ 98 95 Indianapolis, IN...................... 99 82* Iowa City, IA......................... 100 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 84* 91* Anchorage, AK......................... 99 127* Atlanta, GA........................... 101 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 99 94* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 94* 97 Birmingham, AL........................ 94* 106* Bloomington, IN....................... 96* 94* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 107* 118* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 94* 80* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 90* 111* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94* 90* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 92* 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 106* 112* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 98 108* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 92* 105 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 93* 86* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91* 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 101 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 104 106* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 93* 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94* 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 96* 109* Great Falls, MT....................... 75* 98 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 94* 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89* 102 Hartford, CT.......................... 108* 124* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88* 94* Honolulu, HI.......................... 103 115* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 97 91* Huntsville, AL........................ 95* 100 Indianapolis, IN...................... 97 102 Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87* 88* Anchorage, AK......................... 105 107* Atlanta, GA........................... 95 105* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 81* 97* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 98 Birmingham, AL........................ 92* 97* Bloomington, IN....................... 76* 88* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 103 115* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 73* 78* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 102 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 98 94* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 106 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 110* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 103 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 85* 85* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 94* 93* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 101 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 107* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92* 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 103 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 86* 81* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 84* 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 88* 94* Hartford, CT.......................... 105 113* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 89* 96* Honolulu, HI.......................... 102 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 93* 99 Huntsville, AL........................ 98 97 Indianapolis, IN...................... 93 99 Iowa City, IA......................... 89* 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 92* 85* Anchorage, AK......................... 140* 116* Atlanta, GA........................... 103 107* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 106 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 98 104* Birmingham, AL........................ 94 104 Bloomington, IN....................... 87* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 138* 120* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75* 82* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 123* 105* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 90* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 102 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 139* 120* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 101 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 113* 107* Columbus, OH.......................... 109 105 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 103 84* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 111* 111* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 102 110* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 122* 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 122* 97 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 110* 109* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 118* 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 132* 105 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 102 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 92* 88* Hartford, CT.......................... 127* 113 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 109 96* Honolulu, HI.......................... 125* 121* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 102 100 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 95 Indianapolis, IN...................... 103 100 Iowa City, IA......................... 112* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 99 93* Anchorage, AK......................... 127* 111* Atlanta, GA........................... 114* 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 109* 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 103 92* Birmingham, AL........................ 96 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 108* 105 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 119* 112* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 84* 77* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 123* 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 112* 106* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 115* 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 115* 107* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 110* 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 116* 107* Columbus, OH.......................... 106 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98 87* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 118* 106* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 114* 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 130* 109* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 108* 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 105* 113* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 112* 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 106* 93* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 112* 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 115* 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 123* 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 110* 103 Honolulu, HI.......................... 117* 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 111* 96 Huntsville, AL........................ 110* 94 Indianapolis, IN...................... 120* 100 Iowa City, IA......................... 111* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 89* 87* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 101 93* Knoxville, TN......................... 95* 104 Lincoln, NE........................... 91* 85* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 109* 106* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 91* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 95* 85* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97* 96 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 98 107 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 104* 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110* 102 Mobile, AL............................ 90* 81* New Orleans, LA....................... 97* 90* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 116* 115* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93* 87* Ocala, FL............................. 92* 88* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93* 88* Orlando, FL........................... 95* 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108* 107* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 99 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 98 92* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 107* 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 110* 110* Reading, PA........................... 104* 105* Reno, NV.............................. 100 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 106* 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 100 99 Rochester, NY......................... 100 90* Rockford, IL.......................... 102 91* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 109* 103 Salinas, CA........................... 116* 116* San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 94* San Diego, CA......................... 111* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 90* 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94* 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 97* 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 87* 95* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 108* 114* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 95* 108* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 81* 106* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 91* 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 94* 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 96 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104 123* Mobile, AL............................ 85* 88* New Orleans, LA....................... 96* 95* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 115* 120* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 89* 99 Ocala, FL............................. 87* 96* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84* 95* Orlando, FL........................... 87* 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106* 110* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 100 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96 103 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 94* 117* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 110* 118* Reading, PA........................... 93* 105* Reno, NV.............................. 94* 104* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 95* 118* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 95* 103 Rochester, NY......................... 97* 109* Rockford, IL.......................... 96* 103* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 106* 117* Salinas, CA........................... 120* 120* San Antonio, TX....................... 90* 91* San Diego, CA......................... 109* 118* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 83* 85* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94 101 Knoxville, TN......................... 96 96* Lincoln, NE........................... 83* 88* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 112* 107* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 93* 90* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 101 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 92* 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 105* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 106 104* Mobile, AL............................ 92* 91* New Orleans, LA....................... 98 97* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 109* 115* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91* 92* Ocala, FL............................. 90* 89* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 90* 90* Orlando, FL........................... 98 91* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 107* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 104 102 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87* 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 107 106* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 107* Reading, PA........................... 104 103* Reno, NV.............................. 98 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 102 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 97 100 Rochester, NY......................... 93* 99 Rockford, IL.......................... 97 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 105* Salinas, CA........................... 126* 113* San Antonio, TX....................... 82* 92* San Diego, CA......................... 103 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 107 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 121* 109 Knoxville, TN......................... 94 91* Lincoln, NE........................... 95 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 122* 111* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 122* 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 103 106* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 105 103 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 101 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 123* 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 126* 112 Mobile, AL............................ 104 102 New Orleans, LA....................... 100 95* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 142* 120* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 97 98 Ocala, FL............................. 92* 111* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 113* 113* Orlando, FL........................... 101 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 119* 117* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 91 105 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 107 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 127* 116* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 115* 113* Reading, PA........................... 113* 105* Reno, NV.............................. 107 116* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 124* 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 102 103 Rochester, NY......................... 104 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 124* 109* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 114* 124* Salinas, CA........................... 147* 116* San Antonio, TX....................... 108 101 San Diego, CA......................... 119* 112* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 93* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 115* 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 98 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 100 92* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 109* 103 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 110* 95* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 116* 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 107* 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 107* 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 117* 108* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 129* 108* Mobile, AL............................ 106* 92* New Orleans, LA....................... 105* 102 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 116* 111* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 103 90* Ocala, FL............................. 105 104 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 98 88* Orlando, FL........................... 94 107 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 110* 109* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 106* 101 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 109* 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 111* 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 123* 106* Reading, PA........................... 110* 103 Reno, NV.............................. 108* 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 108* 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 112* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 110* 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 114* 105 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 122* 109* Salinas, CA........................... 105* 105 San Antonio, TX....................... 105* 87* San Diego, CA......................... 115* 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 122* 115* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 112* 103 Springfield, MA....................... 112* 105* Springfield, MO....................... 89* 83* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104* 97 Tallahassee, FL....................... 93* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 97* 90* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 101 102 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 110* 104 York, PA.............................. 99 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 116* 128* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 98 124* Springfield, MA....................... 109* 110* Springfield, MO....................... 88* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 89* 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90* 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 98 106* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107* 111* York, PA.............................. 97* 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 93* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 120* 123* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108* 109* Springfield, MA....................... 110* 112* Springfield, MO....................... 88* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 97 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 90* 92* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 104 113* York, PA.............................. 88* 96* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 90* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 136* 123* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 124* 112* Springfield, MA....................... 117* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 85* 95* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 131* 112* Tallahassee, FL....................... 98 91* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 108 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 103 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 111* 121* York, PA.............................. 114* 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 111* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 120* 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 130* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 119* 116* Springfield, MO....................... 103 90* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 115* 109 Tallahassee, FL....................... 104 94* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 103 104 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 116* 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 119* 107 York, PA.............................. 106* 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 113* 111* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.