As of September 25, 2000, the organizations and persons listed
below have submitted comments in response to the proposed enhancements to the
Official Gazette, The Electronic Availability of the Official Gazette of
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Patents on the USPTO Web Site with Proposed
Enhancements, published in the Official Gazette at 1235 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
67 (June 20, 2000). (link to http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2000/week25/patelec.htm)
It is hoped that the public will review this list to determine
if it is complete. If any person or organization has submitted comments but
is not included in this listing, please submit the comment by electronic mail
message at karin.tyson@uspto.gov,
or by facsimile at (703)872-9411, or contact Karin L. Tyson by telephone at
(703) 306-3159.
Comment No. |
Comments submitted on behalf of:
|
Organization, if any identified (but
comment not submitted on behalf of)
|
Comment |
Response to Comment, if any
|
1. |
TP Lewandowski
|
Patent Attorney |
A searchable electronic version is preferred
to paper subscription. |
|
2. |
Don Haas |
Shell Oil Co. |
Good idea, information will be more readily
accessible. PTO should do if saves money and time. |
|
3. |
Ken Waite |
Roche Diagnostics Corp. |
Proposed change could save patent practitioners
a lot of time looking up information, and could save them some money. |
|
4. |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein
& Fox |
|
Text version of O.G. on the Internet is limited.
For example, issuance of Reexamination Certificates does not appear to be
available. Would like to be able to search for reexamination status, such
as whether a reexam certificate has issued, based on patent number. |
This information is not published in the Official
Gazette. The intent of the proposed enhancement is to make the information
that is now in the paper OG to be available in electronic form in a manner
that it is easily available. The desired information can be obtained through
the patent application information retrieval system (PAIR) at: http://www.uspto.gov/ebc.
|
5. |
Raymond B. Dickinson |
Patent/ Trademark Depository Librarian |
The proposed enhancement is a very needed.
Inventors use OG while at library, but should be able to access the same
information when they are at home. Public Libraries may not have TIFF-reader
plug in, and user is not permitted to download. Can view a patent without
this reader on IBM patent website, but should be able to view on USPTO site
without plug in. |
|
6. |
Chuck Watts |
Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack |
Proposal sounds like a very useful idea. If
a choice between OG - Patents PDF and OG Patents VOG is required, VOG will
be more useful. The database must be searchable by OG cite (1235 OG 67)
and keyword search results must result in a list of hits with titles that
are useful, such as the title in the OG notice. |
|
7. |
Stuart M. Kaback |
Exxon/ Mobil Research & Engineering |
Keep paper. Do not copy WIPO and destroy print
version, there are some things that are awkward or impossible to do with
an electronic gazette. |
|
8. |
Robert A. Miller |
S.C. Johnson & Son |
Reading paper OG is now impractical because
it is so large. An electronic OG which is searchable by assignee, class,
subclass and by key word would be useful. Would like a listserver e-mail
service in which a list of patents conforming to a search string selected
by the user is automatically e-mailed to the recipient. It would be useful
to obtain Official Gazette notices relating to registration to practice,
and rule changes by e-mail either as text or as pdf files. |
|
9. |
Donna M. Hanson |
University of Idaho Library, UI PTDL |
Proposed enhancements are appealing, but continued
availability of paper OG is more important |
|
10. |
Joseph L. Ebersole |
Coalition for Patent and Trademark Information
Dissemination |
Against proposal. Stressed that any extra resources
of USPTO should be used to hire patent examiners instead of enhancing OG. |
|
11. |
no name given |
"major corporate user" |
In favor of the proposal - would not need .pdf
files. Medium should be quick to open. |
|
12. |
Madeline Douglass |
Valspar Corporation |
Strongly in favor of the proposal, especially
the proposal to have an Adobe Acrobat (pdf) version available. |
|