skip navigation links 
 
 Search Options 
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us blue spacer  
secondary page banner Return to NRC Home Page

NRC Seal NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov
Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

I-97-106

August 15, 1997

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $55,000 FINE

FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AT GINNA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Rochester Gas and Electric Company for two alleged violations of NRC security requirements at the R.E. Ginna nuclear plant near Rochester, N.Y. The staff has proposed a $55,000 fine.

An NRC inspection was conducted on May 21-30 to review Ginna's security program. Based on that inspection and information gathered at a subsequent predecisional enforcement conference in the NRC's Region I office on August 5, the NRC staff has determined two alleged violations of NRC requirements occurred, each involving inadequacies in the vehicle barriers used to prevent the malicious use of a vehicle to gain entry to the protected and vital areas. The design is intended to prevent adversaries from transporting personnel and their hand-carried equipment by vehicle near the vital areas. It is also intended to preclude the use of a land vehicle bomb.

The first alleged violation is based on the discovery of three openings in the barrier large enough for a vehicle to get through. The second alleged violation involved the use of nylon ties to secure approximately 1200 feet of barrier cables to the posts. These nylon ties could be removed with hand-held tools, defeating their ability to withstand a vehicle's attempt to penetrate the barrier.

In a letter to RG&E, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, "The NRC is particularly concerned that these conditions were not identified by your staff when the barrier was designed and installed, nor were they identified by your security staff during routine tours of the facility."

Mr. Miller also recognized that the company took prompt and comprehensive corrective actions, once the alleged violations were identified, including installing additional barriers in the areas where openings existed.

The company has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or to request in writing that all or part of the penalty be withdrawn.