USGCRP
Home ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Search |
PDF version of this section of the report PDF version of the full report The hardcopy version of this report is available free of charge from the GCRIO Online Catalog
|
![]() |
4. Land Use and Land Cover Change
Land use and land cover affect the global climate system through biogeophysical, For example, land-cover changes such as deforestation and forest fires alter ecosystems and release carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide, and aerosols to the atmosphere. They also change the reflectivity of the land surface which in turn determines how much of the sun’s energy is absorbed and thus available as heat, while vegetation transpiration and surface hydrology determine how this energy is partitioned into latent and sensible heat fluxes. At the same time, vegetation and urban structure determine surface roughness and thus air momentum and heat transport. Land-use and land-cover change studies also provide critical inputs to large-scale vegetation biomass and forest cover assessments that are key components of the carbon cycle. Future land-use and land-cover change goals include very accurate biomass estimates to refine knowledge of carbon storage in vegetation, understanding regional land-use changes that affect biomass, and quantifying linkages and feedbacks between land-use and land-cover change, climate change forcings, climate change, and other related human and environmental components. Research that examines historic, current, and future land-use and land-cover change, their drivers, feedbacks to climate, and environmental, social, economic, and human health consequences is therefore of utmost importance and often requires interagency and intergovernmental cooperation. One example of a multi-agency effort is the Congo Basin Forest Partnership, which focuses on conserving the second largest tropical rainforest in the world in equatorial Africa. Satellite data are used to map forest extent, determine habitat fragmentation, and enforce conservation laws, and thus minimize greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation. Another example was the North America Land Cover Summit held in September 2006, which explored and encouraged collaboration among institutions and government agencies to advance the development and application of land-cover information in Mexico, the United States, and Canada.1 HIGHLIGHTS OF RECENT RESEARCHSelected highlights of recent research into land-use and land-cover change issues supported by CCSP-participating agencies follow. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Drivers Vary by Region and Geopolitical Events.2,3![]() Changes in Eastern Europe due to Socioeconomic and Political Factors following the Breakdown of the Soviet Union.4![]() Land-Cover Change Detection using MODIS Data for Non-Agricultural Areas of the U.S. East Coast.5Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 250 m data are used to form the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a measure of the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation. Composite NDVI data sets were used to provide automated detection of vegetation change and alarm capability on a 1-year time step for the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary System region of the U.S. east coast. Vegetation change detection accuracy was assessed for 2002 at 88% with a reasonable balance between change commission errors (22%) and change omission errors (28%). Annual change detection rates across the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary System over the 2002 to 2005 study period were estimated at 0.7% per annum and varied from 0.4% in 2003 to 0.9% in 2004. Extended regional variations were also readily apparent ranging from 1.6 to 0.1% per annum for the tidal water and mountain ecological zones, respectively. This research included the application of an automated protocol to first filter the MODIS vegetation index data to remove unreliable data values and then estimate the missing data values using a statistical technique to provide high-quality uninterrupted data to support the change detection analysis. The methods and results detailed apply only to non-agricultural areas.Development and Verification of Improved Methods for Remote Assessment of Land-Use Variables Linked to Climate Forcings in Brazil.6![]() Development and Verification of Improved Methods for Remote Assessment of Land-Use Variables Linked to Climate Forcings in the Mid-West United States.7Crop type, yield, and land management affect the balance of greenhouse gas fluxes from land cover in the mid-western United States. The magnitude of surface changes such as tillage intensity affects residue cover and thus the moisture and radiation energy balances at the land surface through changes in evaporation and reflectance. However, these distinctions are difficult to assess across landscapes. Agricultural Research Service scientists working in Iowa have developed a method using Landsat Thematic Mapper and EO-1 Hyperion imaging spectrometer data to classify tillage intensity in cropland.Development and Verification of Improved Methods for Remote Assessment of Land-Use Variables Linked to Climate Forcings in Central America.8
Regional Climate Change due to Agricultural and Urban Development in California.9In the western United States, large changes in land cover and land use have occurred over the past century with rapidly expanding urbanization along the Pacific coast, and extensive agricultural development inland. A regional climate model was used by researchers to quantify the differences in surface energy fluxes and atmospheric circulation associated with land-cover changes between approximately 1990 and the present. They showed that irrigated agriculture in California lowered mean and maximum surface air temperatures, while conversion of natural vegetation to urban areas increased ground temperatures. This land-use change pattern resulted in changes in the spatial patterns of air pressure and energy balance causing reduced westerly breezes and increased inland breezes. Overall, conversion of natural vegetation to irrigated agriculture has had a larger effect on California’s climate than urban growth up until now, but future projections of increased conversion of irrigated land to urban/suburban development could alter this balance.Western Wildfires, Land-Cover Disturbance and Response to Climate Warming.10,11
National Land Cover Database Available for Use in Climate Models and Assessments.12The USGS, on behalf of the interagency Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC), has made available the National Land Cover Database (NLCD 2001) products for the conterminous United States. These products are available for download from the MRLC web site at <www.mrlc.gov>. NLCD 2001 products include 21 classes of land cover, percent tree canopy, and percent urban imperviousness at 30-m resolution derived from Landsat imagery. NLCD 2001 will support a wide variety of users, institutional sectors, and local- to national-scale applications with this updated land-cover data. This baseline data set is essential in determining the effects of land-cover change on climate as well as the effects of climate change on land cover.Deforestation Dynamics Assessed in Brazilian Amazon.13,14![]()
HIGHLIGHTS OF PLANS FOR FY 2008![]() • Improve quantification of the forces bringing about changes in the Earth’s climate and related systems. • Explore the uses and identify the limits of evolving knowledge to manage risks and opportunities related to climate variability and change. • Improve knowledge of the Earth’s past and present climate and environment, including its natural variability, and improve understanding of the causes of observed variability and change. Development of Land-Use Change Models.![]() environmental impacts of climate and land-use change regionally and nationally. This will improve projections of climate and global change and contribute to understanding of possible management risks and opportunities related to climate change. It also contributes directly to understanding the feedbacks between climate change, conservation policies, and land-use and land-cover decisions. This activity will address CCSP Goals 3, 4, and 5 and Questions 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Invasive Species Impacts on Land-Use and Land-Cover Change.Land use and climate change interact to influence the spread of alien or invasive species that in turn have ecological impacts that may result in climate forcings. The EPA, NASA, and USDA are coordinating solicitations to quantitatively investigate these interactions. In addition, a workshop is planned to study and determine future directions for research on interactions between land-use and land-cover change and the carbon cycle relating to climate change. These efforts help quantify climate change drivers and feedbacks, reduce uncertainties in projections of change, and improve understanding of sensitivities of natural and managed ecosystems.This activity will address CCSP Goals 2, 3, and 4 and Questions 6.2, 6.4, and 6.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Prototype Land-Cover Mapping Activities.The National Land Cover Database effort in Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico will be finished by December 2007, marking completion of the first compilation of nationwide land cover ever produced at 30-m resolution. This will improve knowledge of Earth’s present environment and itsvariability and form the baseline for quantifying change at high spatial resolution.This activity will address CCSP Goal 1 and Question 6.1 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Landsat Data Continuity Mission.The importance of Landsat data continuity was a priority for FY 2007 and was emphasized in the FY 2007 edition of Our Changing Planet. Landsat Data Continuity Mission planning continues toward a proposed 2010 launch. In October 2006, NASA and USGS announced the selection and research objectives for the Landsat Science Team. The Science Team will recommend strategies for the effective use of archived data from Landsat sensors and investigate the requirements for future sensors to meet the needs of Landsat users, including the needs of policymakers at all levels of government. The team will cooperate with other Earth-observing missions, both nationally and internationally. This will improve quantification of drivers and atmospheric forcings of climate change, contribute to improved projections of this change, and provide improved understanding of the present environment, its variability, and how it is changing.This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, and 3 and Question 6.1 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Chapter References1) USAID, 2007: The Congo Basin Forests: State of the Forests 2006. Central African Regional Program on the Environment, U.S. AID, Washington, D.C., USA, 256 pp. 2) See eros.usgs.gov/LT/LCCEUS.html. 3) Acevedo, W., J.L. Taylor, D.J. Hester, C.S. Mladinich, and S. Glavac (eds.), 2006: Rates, Trends, Causes, and Consequences of Urban Land-Use Change in the United States. USGS Professional Paper 1726, US Geological Survey, 200 pp. Available at pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1726/pp1726.pdf. 4) Tobias, K., V.C. Radeloff, K. Perzanowski, P. Hostert, and K. Perzanowski, 2006: Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(4), 449-464. 5) Lunetta, R.S., J.F. Knight, J. Ediriwickrem, J.G. Lyon, and L.D. Worthy, 2006: Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105(2), 142-154. 6) Doraiswamy, P.C., B. Akhmedov, L. Beard, A. Stern, and R. Mueller, 2007: Operational prediction of crop yields using MODIS data and products. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Special Publications (in press). Available at <www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/person/ 1430/ISPRS_AGRIFISH_Final.pdf>. 7) Daughtry, C.S.T., P.C. Doraiswamy, E.R. Hunt, A.J. Stern, J.E. McMurtrey, and J.H. Prueger, 2006: Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity. Soil and Tillage Research, 91, 101-108. 8) Hayes, D.J. and W.B. Cohen, 2007: Spatial, spectral, and temporal patterns of tropical forest cover change as observed with multiple scales of optical satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106(1), 1-16. 9) Kueppers, L.M., M.A. Snyder, and L.C. Sloan, 2007: Irrigation cooling effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(3), L03703, doi:10.1029/2006GL028679. 10) Westerling, A.L, H.G. Hidalgo, D.R. Cayan, and T.W. Swetnam, 2006: Warming and earlier spring increases western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science, 313, 940-943. 11) Dore, S., M.C. Montes-Helu, B. Sullivan, J.P. Kaye, S.C. Hart, G. Koch, and B. Hungate, 2007: The effect of intense wildfires on ecosystem gas exchange of ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. North American Carbon Program Investigators meeting, 22-26 January 2007, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Abstract E.2 p. 45. Available at <www.nacarbon.org/cgi-nacp/2007_meetings/ mtg2007_agenda.pl?meeting_id=1>. 12) See <epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd.html>. 13) Morton, D.C., R.S. DeFries, Y.E. Shimabukuro, L.O. Anderson, E. Arai, F. del Bon Espirito-Santo, R. Freitas, and J. Morisette, 2006: Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in Southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14637-14641. 14) Matricardi, E.A.T., D.L. Skole, M.A. Cochrane, M. Pedlowski, and W.H. Chomentowski, 2007: Multi-temporal assessment of selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon using Landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(1-2), 63-82. |
|