![]()
Governance Options Report
King County, Washington
300 Mutual Life Building 605 First Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 622-2403
Henderson, Young & Company Pacific Rim Resources
Mike Colasurdo, Bob Cook, Tim Healy, Tom Jahns, Dave Lawson, Bonnie Liebel, Marlil Lovell, Ruth Ann Mathias, Marliza Mezler, Jack Parker, Peggy Peery, Timothy Ramsey, Candis Ratzbury, Jerry Robison and Cathy Taylor
Disclaimer
>> Introduction and Report Organization: >> General Characteristics of the Study Area: >> Public Survey: >> Preserving the Status Quo: >> Analysis of Incorporation Alternatives: >> Analysis of Annexation: >> Levels of Service and Expenditures Per Capita: >> Appendix A: Maps >> Appendix B: Fiscal Analysis of the Feasibility on Incorporation >> Appendix C: Description of Governance Options >> Appendix D: King County Countywide Planning Policies Related to Annexation and Incorporation >> Appendix E: King County Policies and Programs Related to Annexation and Incorporation >> Appendix F: Letter from North Highline UAC to King County Requesting Governance Options Report >> Appendix G: Survey Form
In response to the direction of the Growth Management Act (GMA), in the early 1990s, King County and the suburban cities worked together to develop a framework of policies intended to guide jurisdictions as they planned for the future. These policies, referred to as the Countywide Planning Policies, are King County and the suburban cities' interjurisdictional plan for implementing the goals of the Growth Management Act. As directed by the GMA, these Countywide Planning Policies explicitly address the status of unincorporated urban areas. >> Sections within the Executive Summary:
II. Study Purpose III. What Are the Alternatives? IV. Preserving the Status Quo V. Is Incorporation Feasible? VI. What Would Annexation Mean for Residents of North Highline? VII. Important Findings >> View Executive Summary:
Rich Text File.rtf (79 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. What are the governance alternatives? II. Goals and objectives of the report III. Report Organization IV. Locator Map >> View Introduction and Report Organization:
Rich Text File.rtf (67 KB) >> View Locator Map
Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. Population II. Taxable Assessed Value >> View Chapter: General Characteristics of the Study Area
Rich Text Format.rtf (3,020 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. Survey Preparation and Data Collection II. Sample III. Data Processing and Analysis IV. Sample Characterstics V. Results and Discussion VI. Future Governance Options VII. Conclusions >> View Chapter: Public Survey
Rich Text Format.rtf (6,447 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. Is preserving the status quo really an option? >> View Chapter: Preserving the Status Quo
Rich Text Format.rtf (63 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
In fact, based on our analysis of North Highline's fiscal position, we find that incorporation is not financially feasible. In order to provide readers with the most complete information possible, on the following pages we provide a thorough discussion of this assessment. Some readers may want to skip to the punch line and scan the following section only briefly, then jump ahead to our analysis of annexation alternatives beginning on page 51. Others, however, wishing to ensure that they have a complete understanding of the underlying reasons for our finding, might want to take the time to read this entire section carefully. >> Sections within:
I. Does Incorporation of North Highline Appear Financially Feasible? II. What are the Key Factors Affecting Feasibility? III.Key Assumptions IV. Overview of Projected Revenues and Expenses
>> View Chapter: Analysis of Incorporation Alternatives
Rich Text Format.rtf (226 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. General Outline of the Annexation Process II. What This Analysis Is About III. Methodology IV. Key Assumptions
>> View Chapter: Analysis of Annexation
Rich Text Format.rtf (76 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within:
I. Levels of Service
2. Corrections 3. Courts 4. Fire and Emergency Medical Services 5. Human Services 6. Library 7. Parks and Recreation 8. Planning and Land Use Regulation 9. Police 10. Roads/Streets 11. Sewer 12. Solid Waste 13. Stormwater 14. Water 15. Property Taxes 16. Other Taxes and Fees
>> View Chapter: Levels of Service and Expenditures Per Capita
Rich Text Format.rtf (237 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> List of Combined Maps within Appendix A:
II. Water and Sewer District Map III. Fire District Map IV. School District Map >> View Combined Maps
Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within Appendix B:
I. Parameters II. Projected Revenues III. Projected Expenses IV. Revenues Less Expenses V. Revenues not available to General Fund VI. Projected Average Annual Capital Expenditures VII. Core Operating Costs and Annual Capital Expenses VIII. Revenues Less Operating & Annual Capital Expenses IX. Notes on Incorporation Feasibility Assessment X. Details of Regression Analysis Used for Forecasting Retail Sales Tax Revenues Per Captia.
>> View Appendix B:
Rich Text Format.rtf (152 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within Appendix C:
I. Incorporation II. Annexation III. Role of King County Boundary Review Board in Annexations and Incorporations
>> View Appendix C:
Rich Text Format.rtf (80 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> View Appendix D:
Rich Text Format.rtf (66 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> Sections within Appendix E:
I. The Annexation and Incorporation Process II. Adopted Annexation and Incorporation Policies III. Potential Annexation Area Program IV. 1997 PAA and Annexation and Incorporation Work Program: Current Status
>> View Appendix E:
Rich Text Format.rtf (73 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
>> View Appendix F:
Rich Text Format.rtf (6 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
Rich Text Format.rtf (106 KB) Return to: Table of Contents | Office of Budget Home
If you have questions about the North Highline Governance Options Report, please call the Governance Transition Section of the Office of Regional Policy and Planning. (206) 205-0700 or send e-mail to Michael Thomas. Portions of the North Highline Governance Report document are provided in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (.pdf). In order to view these documents you must have Acrobat Reader software installed on your computer. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat installed on you computer you can obtain the installation file and instructions from the Adobe web site. Updated: Jan. 6, 2003
June 1999 Governance Transition Report
King County | Executive | News | Services | Comments | Search
Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. |