US Climate Change Science Program

Updated 11 October, 2003

The U.S. Climate Change Science Program:
Vision for the Program and
Highlights of the Scientific Strategic Plan
Report released 24 July 2003

   

 

 Also available: PDF Version of entire document  (6.7 Mb)

See also:
Full Strategic Plan (364 pages)

 

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

 

Appendix C
Key Gaps in the Science of Climate Change

From the White House document at:

"Advancing the Science of Climate Change" Key Gaps in Science of Climate Change [PDF]

Despite major investments in climate change science by the United States and other nations over the past decade, and despite major accomplishments by scientists throughout the world, numerous gaps remain in our understanding of climate change. The National Academy of Sciences identified in its report, Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions, (June 2001), critical uncertainties about the science of climate change. Fundamentally, the report indicated the need to better understand the causes of warming. The National Academy of Sciences stated, "Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth's atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact, rising. The changes observed over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a reflection of natural variability."

The National Academy of Sciences report goes on to identify a range of specific areas that require additional study and research. The following considerations provide important information that will be used in setting priorities:

How much carbon is sequestered by oceans and terrestrial sinks and how much remains in the atmosphere is uncertain:

  • "How land contributes, by location and processes, to exchanges of carbon with the atmosphere is still highly uncertain. . . ." (p. 11)
  • "These estimates [of future carbon dioxide climate forcings] . . . are only approximate because of uncertainty about how efficiently the ocean and terrestrial biosphere will sequester atmospheric CO2." (p. 13)
  • "How much of the carbon from future use of fossil fuels will be seen as increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will depend on what fractions are taken up by land and by the oceans. The exchanges with land occur on various time scales, out to centuries for soil decomposition in high latitudes, and they are sensitive to climate change. Their projection into the future is highly problematic." (p. 18)
  • The feedbacks in the climate system that determine the magnitude and rate of temperature increases are uncertain:

  • "Because there is considerable uncertainty in current understanding of how the climate system varies naturally and reacts to emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols, current estimates of the magnitude of future warming should be regarded as tentative and subject to future adjustments (either upward or downward)." (p. 1)
  • "Much of the difference in predictions of global warming by various climate models is attributable to the fact that each model represents these [feedback] processes in its own particular way. These uncertainties will remain until a more fundamental understanding of the processes that control atmospheric relative humidity and clouds is achieved." (p. 4)
  • The direct and indirect effects of aerosols are uncertain:

  • "The greatest uncertainty about the aerosol climate forcing -- indeed, the largest of all the uncertainties about global climate forcings -- is probably the indirect effect of aerosols on clouds." (p. 14)
  • "The great uncertainty about this indirect aerosol climate forcing presents a severe handicap both for the interpretation of past climate change and for future assessments of climate changes." (p. 14)
  • "Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols is a large source of uncertainty about future climate change." (p. 13)
  • "Because of the scientific uncertainties associated with the sources and composition of carbonaceous aerosols, projections of future impacts on climate are difficult." (p. 12)
  • The details and impacts of regional climate change resulting from global climate change are uncertain:

  • "On the regional scale and in the longer term, there is much more uncertainty" with respect to effects on agriculture and forestry. (p. 19)
  • "The Northern Hemisphere as a whole experienced a slight cooling from 1946-75, and the cooling during that period was quite marked over the eastern United States. The cause of this hiatus in the warming is still under debate." (p. 16)
  • "Health outcomes in response to climate change are the subject of intense debate. . . .The understanding of the relationships between weather/climate and human health is in its infancy and therefore the health consequences of climate change are poorly understood. The costs, benefits, and availability of resources for adaptation are also uncertain." (p. 20)
  • "Changes in storm frequency and intensity are one of the more uncertain elements of future climate change prediction." (p. 20)
  • The nature and causes of the natural variability of climate and its interactions with forced changes are uncertain:

  • "Because of the large and still uncertain level of natural variability inherent in the climate record and the uncertainties in the time histories of the various forcing agents (and particularly aerosols), a causal linkage between the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the observed climate changes during the 20th century cannot be unequivocally established." (p. 17)
  • "The value of indirect effect of ozone changes induced by solar ultraviolet irradiance variations "remains highly uncertain." (p. 14)
  • The future usage of fossil fuels and the future emissions of methane are uncertain:

  • "With a better understanding of the sources and sinks of methane, it may be possible to encourage practices...that lead to a decrease in atmospheric methane and significantly reduce future climate change." (p. 13)
  • "There is no definitive scientific basis for choosing among several possible explanations for these variations in the rates of change of global methane contributions, making it very difficult to predict its future atmospheric concentrations." (p. 11)
  • In response to these gaps in our knowledge, the National Academy of Sciences study also recommends, "research that couples physical, chemical, biological, and human systems; an improved capability of integrating scientific knowledge, including its uncertainty, into effective decision support systems, and an ability to conduct research at the regional or sectoral level that promotes analysis of the response of human and natural systems to multiple stresses."

    The NAS report also indicates that to advance the understanding of climate change, it will be necessary to have "a global observing system in support of long-term climate monitoring and prediction [and] concentration on large-scale modeling through increased, dedicated supercomputing and human resources." High priority areas for further research also are identified in numerous recent reports and documents, such as: Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade (1999), Capacity of U.S. Climate Modeling to Support Climate Change Assessment  Activities (1998), Adequacy of Climate Observing Systems (1999), and others.

    Jump to top of page

     


    US Climate Change Science Program, Suite 250, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: +1 202 223 6262. Fax: +1 202 223 3065. Email: . Web: www.climatescience.gov. Webmaster:
    US Climate Change Science Program Home Page