Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).

General Jurisdiction (PUBLISHED)

Year
Month
Judge

Date FiledJudgeCase NameKeywords: Click here to download opinion
07/29/2008HewittWONDERLYN LORRAINE BELL PINCKNEY, v. THE UNITED STATES, (06-803C)Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to RCFC 54(b) and 59(a) Denied; No Change in Controlling Law, No Availability of Previously Unavailable Evidence, and No Manifest Error of Law or Mistake of Fact in Court’s Opinion of March 28, 2008
07/28/2008SmithMICHAEL TELEMAQUE, v. THE UNITED STATES (08-07C)Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Pro se standard of review; 28 U.S.C. § 1491
07/24/2008WieseMETROTOP PLAZA ASSOCIATES, v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-811C)Contract Disputes Act—Timeliness of a Claim: (i) For statute of limitations purposes, the finality of a contracting officer’s decision is suspended during the period when the contracting officer is reconsidering the decision, whether or not . . .
07/24/2008WheelerWILLIAM ATKINS v. THE UNITED STATES, (08-136C)Fifth Amendment Taking Claim;Patented Device Classified As Machine Gun; Exercise of Police Power; Motion to Dismiss Under RCFC 12(b)(6)
07/23/2008SmithWATTS-HEALY TIBBITTS A JV, v. THE UNITED STATES, and IBC/TOA CORPORATION, Defendant-Intervenor (08-261C)Bid Protest; Responsibility Determination;Preliminary Injunction; FAR 52.209-5; Arbitrary and Capricious; Requisite Business Integrity; International Considerations are Implicated
07/22/2008HewittFRANCISCO JAVIER RIVERA AGREDANO, v. THE UNITED STATES, (05-608C)Trial; Breach of Implied-in-Fact Covenant; Failure to Remove Contraband From Seized Vehicle Prior to Resale Constitutes Breach of Impliedin-Fact Covenant; Damages for Injuries Caused by Breach
07/18/2008FirestoneLEO F. SCHWEITZER, III, and RICHARD S. DALBERTH, v. THE UNITED STATES, (08-497C)Pro Se; Plea Agreements; Failure to State Money Mandating Claim; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. § 2671), Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986), and False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-733); ...
07/15/2008BrugginkTIN MILLS PROPERTIES, LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, and GLENMARK HOLDING, LLC, Intervenor (08-375C)Bid Protest; Injunction; GSAR 552.270-1(c)(7); Negotiated Procurement; Material Deviation from Solicitation Terms; Amendments to Solicitation
07/11/2008BradenSEALIFT, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-627C)Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b); Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706; Bid Protest; Cargo Preference Act of 1904, 10 U.S.C. § 2631(b); Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, 10 U.S.C. § 2305(b), 31 . . .
07/11/2008Miller, G.JOHN DACOSTA AND N.B. SALTY MILLER, v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-807T)Motion to dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); subject matter jurisdiction; Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); Internal Revenue Code of 1986; 26 U.S.C. § 7623; monetary rewards to whistleblowers for information provided to IRS;contract implied in fact
07/07/2008BradenAXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, & LOCKHEED MARTIN FEDERAL HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor (07-532C)Bid Protest; Injunction; Notice Of Appeal As Of Right,Fed. R. App. P. 3(b); Organizational Conflicts of Interest, 48 C.F.R. § 9.5; Permanent Injunction;Post-Judgment Jurisdiction; Public Interest; Set-Aside Of Contract Award; Stay Pending Appeal, Fed. ..
07/07/2008WilliamsIRIS CORPORATION BERHAD, v. THE UNITED STATES, & FULCRUM IT SERVICES COMPANY & 3M ROCHFORD ...,Third-Party Defendants (06-801C)Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1428; Standing; Exclusive Licensee; Joinder; Necessary Party Plaintiff; RCFC 19; Subject Matter Jurisdiction
07/07/2008BaskirTHEODORE FATHAUER, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (07-279C)5 U.S.C. § 5546(a); 5 C.F.R. § 550.171(a); Sunday premium pay; full-time and part-time civil service employees; Chevron deference;express delegation of authority; statutory construction; plain language; legislative history
07/03/2008FirestoneOMEGA WORLD TRAVEL, v. THE UNITED STATES, & CW GOVERNMENT TRAVEL, INC., Defendant-Intervenor (08-118C)Bid Protest; Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (“FASA”), Pub.L. No. 103-355; FAR 16.505(a)(9); Jurisdiction Limited to Challenge of Scope of Task Order; Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. § 423
07/03/2008FirestoneARTURO MORENO, JR., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. THE UNITED STATES, (05-142C)Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.; Statute of Limitations for Willful Violations, 29 U.S.C. § 255(a); Summary Judgment; Disputed Issues of Fact; Credibility Determinations; Equitable Tolling
07/02/2008DamichDAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE, v. THE UNITED STATES, (04-106C)Summary judgment; RCFC 56(c); privity of contract; recovery of mitigation costs incurred through subsidiary; foreseeability
07/01/2008BlockRONALD C. & MARY G. PRATI, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (02-60T)RCFC 42, 59; Motion for Plaintiffs, Reconsideration; Motion to Vacate Judgment; Consolidation
06/30/2008SweeneyD & D LANDHOLDINGS, a limited partnership, v. THE UNITED STATES, (06-877 L)Fifth Amendment Takings Claim; Motion to a limited partnership, Dismiss; Motion for Summary Judgment; Genuine Issue of Material Fact; National Security; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); RCFC 56; Fisher; Statute of Limitations; 28 U.S.C. § 2501
06/30/2008HodgesOSG PRODUCT TANKERS LLC, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and USS PRODUCT CARRIERS LLC, Defendant-Intervenor (07-561C)Post-Award Bid Protest; Cross Motions for Judgment on Administrative Record; RCFC 52.1; Contracting Officer’s Authority to Determine Contractor’s Present Responsibility; Effect of Non-Debarment Decision on Contracting Officer; Integrity and ...
06/27/2008AllegraPACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. THE UNITED STATES, (04-74C) (into which has been consolidated No. 04-75C)Spent Nuclear Fuel Case; Violation of Order Amending Protective Order dated May 14,2006; Availability of Sanctions or Remedies; Government Entitled to Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorneys’Fees