Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).
Date Filed | Judge | Case Name | Keywords: Click here to download opinion |
---|---|---|---|
06/02/2008 | Wheeler | AMERICAN ORDNANCE LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, and BAE SYSTEMS ORDNANCE SYSTEMS INC., Defendant-Intervenor (08-238C) | AMERICAN ORDNANCE LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, and BAE SYSTEMS ORDNANCE SYSTEMS INC., Defendant-Intervenor |
05/29/2008 | Wolski | RAYMOND HARRY SWENTEK, v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-208C) | RAYMOND HARRY SWENTEK, v. THE UNITED STATES, |
05/27/2008 | Lettow | JAMES D. BULLOCK, v. UNITED STATES, (07-871C) | JAMES D. BULLOCK, v. UNITED STATES, |
05/27/2008 | Lettow | PATRICIA GAVIN, et al., v. UNITED STATES, (08-53C) | PATRICIA GAVIN, et al., v. UNITED STATES |
05/21/2008 | Sweeney | BRICKWOOD CONTRACTORS, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, (06-695 C) | BRICKWOOD CONTRACTORS, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, |
05/08/2008 | Wiese | SDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, and HiPk, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor (07-881C) | Post-Award Bid Protest: A motion for a permanent injunction will not be granted where plaintiff failed to show that the agency’s evaluation of the awardee’s technical proposal was arbitrary or capricious |
04/24/2008 | Baskir | THE SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (06-943L) | THE SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
03/31/2008 | Sweeney | GLOBAL COMPUTER ENTERPRISES, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, and QSS GROUP, INC., Defendant-Intervenor (08-133C) | GLOBAL COMPUTER ENTERPRISES, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, and QSS GROUP, INC., Defendant-Intervenor (08-133C) |
03/27/2008 | Lettow | KERMIT A. BELGARDE, also known as KERMIT REDEAGLE-BELGARDE, v. UNITED STATES, (07-265L) | KERMIT A. BELGARDE, also known as KERMIT REDEAGLE-BELGARDE, v. UNITED STATES, |
03/26/2008 | Merow | BARUCH VEGA, v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-685C) | BARUCH VEGA, v. THE UNITED STATES |
03/26/2008 | Baskir | PATRICIA ANNE SALLIS, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (06-416C) | PATRICIA ANNE SALLIS, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, |
03/19/2008 | Sweeney | LARRY L. MOORE, v. THE UNITED STATES (07-798C) | LARRY L. MOORE, v. THE UNITED STATES |
03/19/2008 | Sweeney | BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-225C) | BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, |
03/06/2008 | Firestone | STANLEY R. SILER, v. THE UNITED STATES, (08-099C) | STANLEY R. SILER, v. THE UNITED STATES, |
03/05/2008 | Sweeney | TERESA JANE TAYLOR, v. THE UNITED STATES, (08-25C) | TERESA JANE TAYLOR, v. THE UNITED STATES |
03/04/2008 | Sweeney | DARRELL BOYE et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-195C) | DARRELL BOYE et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, |
02/29/2008 | Sweeney | ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (93-655C) | RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS NOS. 8 AND 9 |
02/29/2008 | Sweeney | ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (93-655C) | RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS |
02/29/2008 | Sweeney | ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (93-655C) | RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS CONCERNING DOCUMENT RETENTION AND PRODUCTION MATTERS |
02/29/2008 | Sweeney | ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (93-655C) | RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 24 AND 25 |