Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of perform.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USASpending.gov Last Updated
August 25, 2008

Contracts data was updated for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was updated for 15 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DOD, DOT, DHS, GSA, HHS, NRC, OPM, SBA and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Colorado
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $6,070,908,641
The amount for this search is 1.6% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 19 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 3,909
Total number of transactions: 35,008
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,814,009,740
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$467,084,960
Competition within a limited pool$1,560,012,057
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$284,208,867
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$335,387,733
Not competed for an allowable reason$459,963,818
Not identified, soon to be addressed$150,241,467

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Colorado (unknown districts)$2,944,651,320
Invalid district: ZZ99$658,787,963
Colorado 2 (Mark Udall)$209,429,102
Colorado 6 (Thomas G. Tancredo)$187,939,492
Texas (unknown districts)$174,760,468

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Space Vehicles$511,853,069
Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$396,435,077
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ground Effect Vehicles, Motor Vehicles, Trailers, and Cycles$191,422,499
Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Miscellaneous Buildings$187,080,687
Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$176,735,804

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$2,048,745,330
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$1,362,745,341
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$493,005,839
Missile Defense Agency$327,514,706
NAVY, Department of the$234,847,555

Top 10 Contractors

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$1,149,807,456
ITT CORPORATION$705,374,683
CH2M HILL COMPANIES, LTD.$399,392,866
BALL CORPORATION$194,297,707
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION$161,759,224
ITT INDUSTRIES SYSTEMS DIV$138,168,756
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO$133,570,248
SI INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, INC$133,456,777
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP (unknown parent company, no D & B number)$114,139,876
TETRA TECH, INC.$107,877,734

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$4,218,359,669
2001$4,449,201,616
2002$4,103,062,653
2003$5,078,465,427
2004$5,579,703,405
2005$6,070,908,641
2006$7,876,171,501
2007$8,494,384,645
2008 3Q * Partial year help link$5,240,743,984
*Note: FY 2008 only includes data up to second and part of third quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on September 24, 2008.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.