NOAA

Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory

Skip to: [content] [navigation]
If you are using Navigator 4.x or Internet Explorer 4.x or Omni Web 4.x , this site will not render correctly!

gfdl's home page > gfdl on-line bibliography > 2000: Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(D22), 27,059-27,066

Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large-scale models

Stephen A. Klein, 2000: Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large-scale modelsJournal of Geophysical Research, 105(D22), 27,059-27,066.
Abstract: Prognostic cloud schemes in large scale models are typically formulated in terms of grid-cell average values of cloud condensate concentration q, although variability in q at spatial scales smaller than the grid cell is known to exist.  Because the source and sink processes modifying q are nonlinear, the process rates computed using the mean value of q are biased relative to process rates which account for sub-grid scale variability.  A preliminary assessment shows that these biases can modify instantaneous process rates by as much as a factor of two.  Observations of q at a continental site suggest that the bias is avoided in current practice through the arbitrary tuning of model parameters. Models might be improved if sub-grid scale variability in q were explicitly considered; several approaches to this goal are suggested.
smaller bigger reset
last modified: March 22 2004.