Home

I. Executive Summary

II. Background

III. Goals of the Meeting

IV. Venue and Invited Participants

V. Surveillance Overview

VI. Testing Algorithms

VII. Quality Systems

VIII. ARV Resistance Testing for Surveillance

IX. Surveillance of Recent HIV Infections
Consensus Meeting for Improving the Quality of
Laboratory Testing for HIV Surveillance
October 19-21
Hyatt Regency Atlanta

Background
 
     HIV surveillance systems that use biomarkers provide essential data for program planning, monitoring, and advocacy and are dependent on functioning laboratory systems. However, surveillance reports rarely include data on specimen and testing quality, and anecdotal evidence indicates that prevalence estimates can be substantially biased in the absence of quality laboratory systems. Bias may be introduced through sub-optimal specimen collection and processing, labeling, storage, testing, or transcription errors during laboratory data management, all impacting the overall quality of data in a surveillance system. International guidelines on testing algorithms for HIV surveillance inherently imply quality testing procedures with minimal error rates. Well-trained staff, adherence to standard operating procedures, and implemented quality assurance are essential to produce quality testing data; however, in resource-constrained settings laboratory systems and staff face challenges that often get little attention in evaluating surveillance systems and data interpretation.

     The recent expansion of HIV surveillance in numerous countries with generalized epidemics provides examples of these challenges. These experiences should be utilized to review current standards and practices and propose solutions and improvements. This meeting provided a venue for laboratory scientists and surveillance staff to discuss the current challenges in laboratory methods, including testing algorithms and quality assurance. It aimed at achieving consensus to re-formulate or develop new guidelines and recommendations. The meeting was international in scope and brought together experts from developing countries and their counterparts from international institutions.