NOAA's National Geodetic Survey County Scorecard
1. What State are you representing?

Response
Count
 172 

answered question  172 

skipped question  0 
2. Which County in your State are you representing?

Response
Count
 172 

answered question  172 

skipped question  0 
3. What best describes your profession?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 County Surveyor (non-NACS member) 24.9%  42 
 County Surveyor (NACS member) 29.6%  50 
 Local Government Representative 10.7%  18 
 Geodesist/Cartographer 1.2%  2 
 Other Land Surveyor/Engineer 14.8%  25 
 GIS/Mapping User 22.5%  38 
 Other (please specify) 14.2%  24 

answered question  169 

skipped question  3 
4. How would you rate your local positioning infrastructure?

ExcellentAdequateInadequateN/ARating AverageResponse
Count
CORS GPS Data Availability20.8% (27)47.7% (62)14.6% (19)16.9% (22)1.93 130 
CORS Data Reliability23.8% (31)45.4% (59)7.7% (10)23.1% (30)1.79 130 
Monumented NGS Control - Horizontal19.2% (25)54.6% (71)19.2% (25)6.9% (9)2.00 130 
Monumented NGS Control - Vertical13.8% (18)43.8% (57)35.4% (46)6.9% (9)2.23 130 

answered question  130 

skipped question  42 
5. Part of NGS' mission is to provide the public with survey control information, such as Latitude, Longitude, Height and Gravity Data. NGS datasheets provide this information. Which NGS data retrieval options have you used? (check all that apply)

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Traditional Datasheet 88.4%  107 
 Shapefiles: Shapefiles format is intended to be used with a GIS or automated mapping system 28.9%  35 
 SDTS: SDTS format is intended to be used with a GIS or automated mapping system 10.7%  13 
 Tidal Bench Marks 12.4%  15 
 Other (please specify) 5.0%  6 

answered question  121 

skipped question  51 
6. NGS makes data available to the general public. What has been your satisfaction with the following data?

Very SatisfiedSatisfiedNot SatisfiedN/ARating AverageResponse
Count
Aeronautical Photos and Data4.6% (6)29.0% (38)6.1% (8)60.3% (79)2.04 131 
CORS: GPS Continuously Operating Reference Stations23.1% (30)39.2% (51)7.7% (10)30.0% (39)1.78 130 
Monumented NGS Control- Horizontal23.1% (30)51.5% (67)15.4% (20)10.0% (13)1.91 130 
Monumented NGS Control – Vertical16.9% (22)47.7% (62)25.4% (33)10.0% (13)2.09 130 
Geoid Models15.3% (20)48.1% (63)5.3% (7)31.3% (41)1.86 131 
GPS Orbital Data9.2% (12)36.6% (48)3.1% (4)51.1% (67)1.88 131 
IERS Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) control points2.3% (3)21.4% (28)2.3% (3)74.0% (97)2.00 131 
GPS Derived Ionosphere maps0.0% (0)19.8% (26)3.1% (4)77.1% (101)2.13 131 
Tidal and Orthometric Elevations1.5% (2)26.0% (34)5.3% (7)67.2% (88)2.12 131 

answered question  130 

skipped question  42 
7. Do you feel you have sufficient access to:

YesNoN/AResponse
Count
Horizontal Position Component of NSRS73.1% (95)8.5% (11)18.5% (24)130 
Ellipsoid Height Component of NSRS64.6% (84)7.7% (10)27.7% (36)130 
Orthometric Height Component of NSRS66.2% (86)9.2% (12)24.6% (32)130 
Azimuth from geodetic and grid north62.3% (81)6.9% (9)30.8% (40)130 
Length Standard (Calibration Baseline)38.2% (50)26.0% (34)35.9% (47)131 
Gravity Data26.7% (35)12.2% (16)61.1% (80)131 
Historical Data53.4% (70)12.2% (16)34.4% (45)131 
Deflection of the Vertical30.5% (40)9.2% (12)60.3% (79)131 
Other Geodetic Information 38.5% (50)8.5% (11)53.1% (69)130 

answered question  130 

skipped question  42 
8. What is your overall satisfaction with NGS infrastructure?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 18.5%  24 
 Satisfied 65.4%  85 
 Not Satisfied 16.2%  21 

answered question  130 

skipped question  42 
9. Please provide any comments on NGS data products and infrastructure.

Response
Count
 35 

answered question  35 

skipped question  137 
10. Please rate the user friendliness of the following models and tools you are familiar with

Very User FriendlyAverage User FriendlyNot User FriendlyNot FamiliarRating AverageResponse
Count
On-line Positioning User Service (OPUS )18.9% (23)30.3% (37)0.0% (0)50.8% (62)1.62 122 
DYNAMIC_HT4.1% (5)13.9% (17)0.0% (0)82.0% (100)1.77 122 
GEOID039.0% (11)37.7% (46)0.0% (0)53.3% (65)1.81 122 
Horizontal Time Dependent Positioning (HTDP) 2.5% (3)12.3% (15)1.6% (2)83.6% (102)1.95 122 
Inverse/Forward/Invers3D/Forwrd3D 3.3% (4)13.1% (16)0.8% (1)82.8% (101)1.86 122 
Magnetic Declination11.6% (14)29.8% (36)0.0% (0)58.7% (71)1.72 121 
North American Datum Conversion Utility (NADCON)19.0% (23)36.4% (44)6.6% (8)38.0% (46)1.80 121 
NAVD 88 Modeled Gravity5.8% (7)17.4% (21)1.7% (2)75.2% (91)1.83 121 
State Plane Coordinates 23.3% (28)49.2% (59)2.5% (3)25.0% (30)1.72 120 
Surface Gravity Prediction0.8% (1)5.0% (6)0.0% (0)94.2% (114)1.86 121 
Tidal and Orthometric Elevations4.1% (5)19.8% (24)1.7% (2)74.4% (90)1.90 121 
U.S. National Grid7.4% (9)19.8% (24)0.8% (1)71.9% (87)1.76 121 
Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates11.6% (14)32.2% (39)1.7% (2)54.5% (66)1.78 121 
User Friendly CORS (UFCORS)12.4% (15)27.3% (33)0.8% (1)59.5% (72)1.71 121 
North American Vertical Datum Conversion Utility (VERTCON)17.4% (21)30.6% (37)5.0% (6)47.1% (57)1.77 121 
XYZ Coordinate Conversion13.2% (16)32.2% (39)0.8% (1)53.7% (65)1.73 121 
NGS Mark Recovery Program13.2% (16)31.4% (38)6.6% (8)48.8% (59)1.87 121 
Specifications, Guidelines, and Tools5.8% (7)39.7% (48)3.3% (4)51.2% (62)1.95 121 

answered question  121 

skipped question  51 
11. For each of the following tools, enter any comments or suggestions for improvements that you might have to make the Models and Tools most useful and user-friendly:

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 On-line Positioning User Service (OPUS and OPUS DB ) 47.1%  8 
 DYNAMIC_HT 11.8%  2 
 GEOID03 17.7%  3 
 Horizontal Time Dependent Positioning (HTDP)  23.5%  4 
 Inverse/Forward/Invers3D/Forwrd3D  11.8%  2 
 Magnetic Declination 23.5%  4 
 North American Datum Conversion Utility (NADCON) 35.3%  6 
 North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)  17.7%  3 
 State Plane Coordinates  35.3%  6 
 Surface Gravity Prediction 11.8%  2 
 Tidal and Orthometric Elevations 23.5%  4 
 U.S. National Grid 11.8%  2 
 Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates 17.7%  3 
 User Friendly CORS (UFCORS) 23.5%  4 
 North American Vertical Datum Conversion Utility (VERTCON) 17.7%  3 
 XYZ Coordinate Conversion 17.7%  3 
 NGS Mark Recovery Program 29.4%  5 
 Specifications, Guidelines, and Tools 17.7%  3 
 Other (please specify) 17.7%  3 

answered question  17 

skipped question  155 
12. What is your overall satisfiaction with NGS' Models and Tools?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 12.5%  15 
 Satisfied 79.2%  95 
 Not Satisfied 8.3%  10 

answered question  120 

skipped question  52 
13. Please provide any additional comments you have regarding NGS Models and Tools.

Response
Count
 14 

answered question  14 

skipped question  158 
14. NGS conducts the following workshops throughout the United States, involving the cooperation of professional societies, universities, and international, Federal, state, and local organizations. Have you ever attended any of the following workshops or forums and please rate the following workshops you have attended

ExcellentAdequateInadequateHave Not AttendedRating AverageResponse
Count
Height Modernization Forum6.8% (8)18.8% (22)0.9% (1)73.5% (86)1.77 117 
Blue Booking0.9% (1)7.7% (9)1.7% (2)89.7% (105)2.08 117 
Calibration Baselines2.6% (3)9.4% (11)0.9% (1)87.2% (102)1.87 117 
CORS Usage6.0% (7)13.7% (16)1.7% (2)78.6% (92)1.80 117 
Developing an Accurate GIS/LIS1.7% (2)10.3% (12)0.9% (1)87.2% (102)1.93 117 
Development, Implementation and Future of NSRS1.7% (2)11.1% (13)0.0% (0)87.2% (102)1.87 117 
GPS-Derived Heights – Part 1: Development and Description of NGS Guidelines2.6% (3)16.2% (19)0.0% (0)81.2% (95)1.86 117 
GPS Derived Heights – Part 2: Planning and Evaluating a GPS Vertical Survey2.6% (3)12.8% (15)0.9% (1)83.8% (98)1.89 117 
GPS Processing Workshops2.6% (3)10.3% (12)0.9% (1)86.3% (101)1.88 117 
GPS Processing Workshop (PAGES)0.0% (0)7.7% (9)0.9% (1)91.5% (107)2.10 117 
Network Adjustment Workshop (ADJUST)0.9% (1)5.1% (6)2.6% (3)91.5% (107)2.20 117 
North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) 6.8% (8)11.1% (13)0.0% (0)82.1% (96)1.62 117 
NGS Products and Services3.4% (4)12.8% (15)0.0% (0)83.8% (98)1.79 117 
Positioning Accuracy and Standards2.6% (3)9.4% (11)1.7% (2)86.3% (101)1.94 117 
State Plane Coordinates and Datum Transformations6.8% (8)16.2% (19)1.7% (2)75.2% (88)1.79 117 
Survey Mark Preservation3.4% (4)9.4% (11)2.6% (3)84.6% (99)1.94 117 
Tidal & Geodetic Vertical Datums0.9% (1)6.0% (7)0.0% (0)93.2% (109)1.88 117 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
15. Is there a Workshop/Forum listed that you have not attended but would like to attend in your area?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Height Modernization Forum 18.8%  16 
 Blue Booking 34.1%  29 
 Calibration Baselines 28.2%  24 
 CORS Usage 47.1%  40 
 Developing an Accurate GIS/LIS 38.8%  33 
 Development, Implementation and Future of NSRS 18.8%  16 
 GPS-Derived Heights – Part 1: Development and Description of NGS Guidelines 31.8%  27 
 GPS Derived Heights – Part 2: Planning and Evaluating a GPS Vertical Survey 35.3%  30 
 GPS Processing Workshops 55.3%  47 
 GPS Processing Workshop (PAGES) 31.8%  27 
 Network Adjustment Workshop (ADJUST) 37.7%  32 
 North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)  35.3%  30 
 NGS Products and Services 32.9%  28 
 Positioning Accuracy and Standards 44.7%  38 
 State Plane Coordinates and Datum Transformations 54.1%  46 
 Survey Mark Preservation 45.9%  39 
 Tidal & Geodetic Vertical Datums 17.7%  15 
 Other (please specify) 2.4%  2 

answered question  85 

skipped question  87 
16. Is there another Workshop that you would like NGS to provide?

Response
Count
 14 

answered question  14 

skipped question  158 
17. Have you seen or visited the NGS booth in the last year at participating conferences, if so, how would you rate it?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 8.6%  10 
 Satisfied 30.2%  35 
 Not Satisfied 2.6%  3 
 N/A 58.6%  68 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
18. Are you aware of the State Advisor/Coordinator Program?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Yes 61.2%  71 
 No 38.8%  45 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
19. If you live in a State with a State Advisor/Coordinator, what has been your level of satisfaction with that individual?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 23.3%  27 
 Satisfied 25.0%  29 
 Not Satisfied 6.0%  7 
 N/A 45.7%  53 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
20. What is your overall level of satisfaction of NGS' capacity building efforts and outreach?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 14.7%  17 
 Satisfied 65.5%  76 
 Not Satisifed 19.8%  23 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
21. What is your overall level of satisfaction withe products and services that NGS provides to your work?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 14.7%  17 
 Satisfied 69.8%  81 
 Not Satisfied 15.5%  18 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
22. NGS employees respond to inquiries regarding the availability and use of geodetic data. If you have contacted an NGS employee for assistance, what has been your level of satisfaction with their response?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
 Very Satisfied 18.1%  21 
 Satisfied 31.9%  37 
 Not Satisfied 6.0%  7 
 N/A 44.0%  51 

answered question  116 

skipped question  56 
23. Please provide any comments you have regarding NGS data products and services.

Response
Count
 21 

answered question  21 

skipped question  151