skip navigation links 
 
 Search Options 
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us blue spacer  
secondary page banner Return to NRC Home Page
PWR Sump Performance
Overview
Function of the Containment Sump
Description of the Safety Issues
Discovery of the Sump Performance Issue
NRC Activities
Public Meetings
Resolution Schedule
Regulatory Activities
Related Information
Historical Timeline
Frequently Asked Questions
Reports and Correspondence
Regulations and Guidance
Technical References
Regulatory References
Bulletin 2003-01
Generic Letter 2004-02
Other Correspondence

Regulatory Activities

Completed

For boiling-water reactors (BWRs), the suction strainer performance issue has been addressed by licensee responses to Bulletin 96-03, "Potential Plugging of Emergency Core Cooling Suction Strainers by Debris in Boiling-Water Reactors." The NRC issued this bulletin asking licensees to implement procedures and modifications to minimize potential clogging of suction strainers. The staff has confirmed the adequacy of the licensee solutions implemented in response to the bulletin.

Based on some further study of the issue, the NRC was concerned about licensees' calculations for the amount of water available to the sump pumps in the case of a loss-of-coolant accident. The NRC issued Generic Letter 97-04, "Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for Emergency Core Cooling and Containment Heat Removal Pumps," asking licensees to provide these calculations for review. No generic concerns were identified during the NRC's review.

Events at a number of plants raised concerns regarding the potential for coatings in containment to form debris and clog sump screens and suction strainers. The NRC subsequently issued Generic Letter 98-04, "Potential for Degradation of the Emergency Core Cooling System and the Containment Spray System After a Loss-of-Coolant Accident Because of Construction and Protective Coating Deficiencies and Foreign Material in Containment," to obtain information in order to evaluate how the licensees maintain and monitor these coatings. Also, the NRC revised Regulatory Guide 1.54, "Service Level I, II, and III Protective Coatings Applied to Nuclear Power Plants," to employ current American Society for Testing and Materials standards for the selection, qualification, application, and maintenance of protective coatings.

The NRC has issued Bulletin 2003-01, "Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors," in which PWR licensees were asked to either confirm their compliance with existing regulatory requirements or describe interim compensatory measures they would put in place to reduce potential risks associated with sump performance. The NRC has reviewed the adequacy of the licensee's responses to the bulletin. Also, a temporary instruction (TI 2515/153) was issued as guidance for NRC inspectors to use during the inspections of licensee's implementation of compensatory measures. The NRC has also issued revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.82, "Water Sources for Long-Term Recirculation Cooling following a Loss of Coolant Accident." This Regulatory Guide provides the industry with the most current guidance on sump performance and long-term cooling.

The industry submitted  evaluation guidelines for licensees to use when analyzing their plants for sump performance. The NRC reviewed these evaluation guidelines and issued a safety evaluation in December 2004.

(To top of page)

Ongoing

The NRC issued a generic letter in September 2004. This generic letter asked licensees to perform plant-specific evaluations to determine whether sump performance is an issue. The industry submitted evaluation guidelines, which were accepted and modified by the NRC Safety Evaluation, are mentioned in the generic letter as an acceptable method for demonstrating compliance with the regulations. In addition, the NRC is auditing selected plants implementations (e.g., plant-specific evaluations) of the NRC request in the proposed generic letter.

(To top of page)

Planned

As GSI-191 approaches resolution, the NRC plans to use several approaches to obtaining reasonable assurance that sumps will perform adequately if called upon following a LOCA. The NRC plans to complete a series of plant-specific audits. The staff plans to review each licensee's final supplemental response to GL 2004-02. To support this review and minimize the potential for RAIs, the NRC has developed and released to licensees and other members of the public a content guide for the final supplemental responses. In addition, the Regions are inspecting each PWR to verify that licensees have made changes to which they have committed in correspondence with the NRC.

(To top of page)



Privacy Policy | Site Disclaimer
Monday, July 14, 2008