I. Basic Information Regarding Report
II. How to Make a FOIA Request
III. Definitions of Terms and Acronyms Used in the Report
IV. Exemption 3 Statutes
V. Initial FOIA/PA Access Requests
VI. Appeals of Initial Denials of FOIA/PA Requests
VII. Compliance with Time Limits
VIII. Comparisons with Previous Year
IX. & X. FOIA Costs / Staffing & Fees
XI. DOT FOIA Regulations (including fee schedule) - 49 CFR Part
7
PDF version of the entire report (814 KB)
Go to: DOT FOIA Page // Department of Transportation Home Page
A. Person to be contacted with questions about the report:
Kathy Ray, Departmental FOIA Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of General Counsel (C-12)
400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 5432
Washington, D.C.20590
(202) 366-5546
B. Electronic address for report on the World Wide Web:
C. Person to be contacted for a copy of the report in paper form:
Darlene Wallace, Paralegal Specialist
U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of General Counsel (C-12)
400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 5432
Washington, D.C.20590
(202) 366-4245
A. Names, addresses, telephone numbers, fax numbers, and information to submit a request electronically (if applicable) for all individual agency components and offices that receive FOIA requests.
Kathy Ray, Departmental FOIA Officer |
Regina L. Raiford, FOIA/Privacy Act Officer |
Robert A. Monniere, Attorney |
James Kabel, FOIA Officer (HAIM-12) |
Tiffanie C. Coleman, FOIA Officer |
Denise Kollehlon, FOIA Officer (RCC-20) |
Inga Reeder, FOIA Officer |
Jeannette S. Riddick (MAR-225) |
Executive Secretariat |
Gail Mayhew, FOIA Officer |
Copper M. Perry, Manager |
Edward Margosian |
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Field Offices: |
|
Ms. Tracey Hegna, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Veronica Bailey, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Trina Hankerson |
Ms. Vickie Morris, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Carol Goodsell, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Mitzi Warren, FOIACoordinator |
Ms. Linda Chatman, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Sandra Freeman, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Carlette Young, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Connie Toby, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Barbara Harris-Para, FOIA Coordinator |
Mr. Doug Burdette, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Carrie LaFollette, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Margaret Fee, FOIA Coordinator |
Ms. Joey Muth, FOIA Coordinator |
B. Brief description of the Agency's response times.
Some components of the Department of Transportation were able to respond to their FOIA requests within the statutory time frames. For a detailed breakdown of each component’s response times, see Section VII of this report, Compliance With Time Limits.
C. Brief description of why some requests are not granted.
Some requested records, or portions of records, were withheld pursuant to the FOIA's exemptions. The most frequently used exemption in DOT was Exemption 6, which protects against a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Other reasons for not granting requests included:
DOT did not have the records sought.
The requester did not seek records; rather, he or she was seeking answers to questions.
The information from the records sought was publicly available.
A. Agency-specific acronyms or other terms.
DOT |
Department of Transportation |
---|---|
OST |
Office of the Secretary of Transportation |
OIG |
Office of Inspector General |
BTS |
Bureau of Transportation Statistics 1/ |
FAA |
Federal Aviation Administration |
FHWA |
Federal Highway Administration |
FMCSA |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration |
FRA |
Federal Railroad Administration |
FTA |
Federal Transit Administration |
MARAD |
Maritime Administration |
NHTSA |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration |
PHMSA |
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1/ |
RITA |
Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1/ |
RSPA |
Research and Special Programs Administration 1/ |
SLSDC |
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation |
SSI |
Sensitive Security Information. (49 U.S.C. § 40119 and 49 C.F.R. Parts 15 and 1520.) |
Remanded Appeal |
An appeal request, particularly a “no records” appeal, sent back to the original action office or forwarded to another office when the requester provides additional information either clarifying the documents sought or providing additional search parameters. The action office considers the request as if it were a new request, responding directly to the requester. Remanded appeal responses may again be appealed; appeal rights are provided if the remanded appeal response is a denial, partial denial or “no records” determination. |
1/ Effective February 20, 2005, two new administrations were established within DOT. The Norman Y. Mineta Research and Special Programs Improvement Act reorganized RSPA into two new administrations—PHMSA and RITA. PHMSA succeeds to all the authority exercised by RSPA with regard to pipeline and hazardous materials safety. RITA succeeds to the research authority exercised by RSPA and, in addition, exercises other duties and powers of the Secretary that advance the Department’s research, development, and technology objectives. In addition, BTS was statutorily transferred to RITA.
B. Basic terms expressed in common terminology.
1. FOIA / PA Request—Freedom of Information Act / Privacy Act request. A FOIA request is generally a request for access to records concerning a third party, an organization, or a particular topic of interest. A Privacy Act request is a request for records concerning oneself; such requests may also be treated as FOIA requests.
2. Initial Request—a request to a federal agency for access to records under the FOIA.
3. Appeal—a request to a federal agency asking that it review at a higher administrative level a full denial or partial denial of access to records under the FOIA, or any other FOIA determination such as a matter pertaining to fees.
4. Processed Request or Appeal—a request or appeal for which an agency has taken a final action on the request or the appeal in all respects.
5. Multi-track Processing—a system in which requests requiring relatively minimal review are classified as simple requests and are placed in one processing track and requests that are more voluminous and that require more review are classified as complex requests. Complex requests are placed in one or more other tracks. Requests within each track are processed on a first in, first out basis. A requester who has an urgent need for records may request expedited processing (see below).
6. Expedited Processing—When a requestor can show there is an exceptional need or urgency for a record or records (see 49 CFR 7.31(c)), an agency will process a FOIA request before those FOIA requests that have been submitted at an earlier date.
7. Simple Request—An agency using multi-track processing will classify a low volume request that requires relatively minimal review as a simple request and will place it in its fastest, non-expedited track.
8. Complex Request— An agency using multi-track processing will classify a voluminous request that requires more review as a complex request and will place it in its slower track.
9. Grant—an agency decision to disclose all records in full in response to a FOIA request.
10. Partial Grant—an agency decision to disclose a record in part in response to a FOIA request, withholding information determined to be exempt under one or more of the FOIA exemptions; or a decision to disclose some records in their entirety, but to withhold others in whole or in part.
11. Denial—an agency decision not to release any part of a record or records in response to a FOIA request because all the information in the requested records is determined by the agency to be exempt under one or more of the FOIA exemptions, or for some procedural reason, such as no record is located in response to a FOIA request.
12. Time Limits—Under FOIA, the period of time within which an agency must respond to a FOIA request. Ordinarily, this period is 20 working days from proper receipt of a “perfected” FOIA request.
13. Perfected Request—a FOIA request for records that has been received by the FOIA office of the agency or agency component in possession of the records, which adequately describes the records sought, and for which there is no remaining question about the payment of applicable fees.
14. Exemption 3 Statute—a separate federal statute prohibiting the disclosure of a certain type of information and authorizing its withholding under FOIA exemption (b)(3).
15. Median Number—the median number is the middle number on the list in a set of numbers listed from the least number to the greatest number. For example, of 3, 7, and 14, the median number is 7. If a set of numbers has two middle numbers, the median is the number halfway between the two numbers. For example, 3, 4, 8, 12, the median number equals 4+8 = 12/2 = 6.
16. Average Number—the number obtained by dividing the sum of a group of numbers by the quantity of numbers in the group. For example, of 3, 7, and 14, the average number is 8.
A. List of Exemption 3 statutes relied on by agency during current fiscal year.
Statute |
Type of Information Withheld |
Case Citation |
---|---|---|
5 U.S.C. App. 4, § 107(a)(2) |
Confidential financial disclosure reports. |
Meyerhoff v. EPA, 958 F.2d 1498 (9th Cir. 1992) |
23 U.S.C. § 403, note |
The identity of individuals in highway traffic accident or research reports. |
N/A |
31 U.S.C. § 3729(d) |
Certain information on false claims |
N/A |
41 U.S.C. § 253b(m) |
Contract proposals not incorporated in contracts. |
Hornbostel v. DOI, 305 F.Supp.2d 21 (D.D.C. 2003) |
49 U.S.C. § 30305(c)(1) |
Certain information received pursuant to the National Driver Register Act of 1982. |
N/A |
49 U.S.C. § 31143(b) |
IDs of motor carrier safety complainants. |
N/A |
49 U.S.C. § 40119 |
Information that would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, would reveal a trade secret or privileged or confidential information, or would be detrimental to the safety of passengers in transportation. |
N/A |
49 U.S.C. § 46102(c) |
Aviation safety, when requested for national defense |
N/A |
A. Numbers of Initial Requests
1. Number of requests pending end of FY 2004 |
2. Number of requests received during FY 2005 |
3. Number of requests processed during FY 2005 |
4. Number of requests pending as of end of FY 2005 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
74 |
316 |
247 |
143 |
OIG |
19 |
111 |
84 |
46 |
FAA |
* 1,402 |
6,680 |
6,626 |
1,456 |
FHWA |
87 |
296 |
342 |
41 |
FRA |
66 |
491 |
451 |
106 |
NHTSA |
8 |
264 |
263 |
9 |
FTA |
26 |
184 |
199 |
11 |
SLSDC |
2 |
32 |
33 |
1 |
MARAD |
64 |
171 |
124 |
111 |
RSPA |
20 |
149 |
119 |
N/A |
PHMSA |
N/A |
50 |
||
FMCSA |
91 |
829 |
823 |
97 |
BTS |
0 |
74 |
73 |
N/A |
RITA |
N/A |
1 |
||
Totals |
1,859 |
9,597 |
9,384 |
2,072 |
* This number is 112 fewer than the number reported as pending at the end of the year in the FY 2004 report; these 112 were either FY 2004 double entries discovered during FY 2005, or FY 2004 closures that were not entered until FY 2005.
B. Disposition of Initial Requests
1. Number of Total Grants |
2. Number of Partial Grants |
3. Number of Denials |
4. Other Reasons for Non-Disclosure |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
25 |
20 |
6 |
196 |
OIG |
16 |
30 |
19 |
19 |
FAA |
2,723 |
1,304 |
95 |
2,504 |
FHWA |
156 |
52 |
29 |
105 |
FRA |
207 |
95 |
0 |
149 |
NHTSA |
95 |
107 |
10 |
51 |
FTA |
84 |
56 |
6 |
53 |
SLSDC |
19 |
5 |
0 |
9 |
MARAD |
71 |
24 |
1 |
28 |
RSPA |
73 |
12 |
5 |
29 |
PHMSA |
||||
FMCSA |
193 |
469 |
84 |
77 |
BTS |
33 |
6 |
0 |
34 |
RITA |
||||
Totals |
3,695 |
2,180 |
255 |
3,254 |
2. & 3. Number of times each FOIA exemption was used
FOIA Exemptions
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7(A) |
7(B) |
7(C) |
7(D) |
7(E) |
7(F) |
8 |
9 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
OIG |
0 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
20 |
16 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FAA |
0 |
30 |
10 |
103 |
395 |
728 |
90 |
8 |
11 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FHWA |
0 |
2 |
6 |
25 |
20 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FRA |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
90 |
4 |
0 |
90 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NHTSA |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
12 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FTA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
7 |
21 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SLSDC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MARAD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RSPA |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PHMSA |
||||||||||||||
FMCSA |
0 |
9 |
91 |
6 |
3 |
446 |
27 |
1 |
261 |
88 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
BTS |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RITA |
||||||||||||||
Totals |
2 |
54 |
115 |
188 |
467 |
1,366 |
144 |
9 |
387 |
90 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4. Other reasons for non-disclosure
No records |
Referral |
Request with-drawn |
Fee related |
Not reasonably described |
Not a proper request |
Not a record |
Duplicate request |
Available from another source |
Referred to agency website |
Total |
|
OST |
31 |
150 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
196 |
OIG |
15 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
FAA |
1,840 |
20 |
399 |
165 |
14 |
51 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,504 |
FHWA |
4 |
15 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
28 |
9 |
31 |
6 |
105 |
FRA |
129 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
149 |
NHTSA |
20 |
17 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
51 |
FTA |
41 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
SLSDC |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
MARAD |
17 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
RSPA |
10 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
29 |
PHMSA |
|||||||||||
FMCSA |
13 |
0 |
23 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
23 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
77 |
BTS |
2 |
28 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
34 |
RITA |
|||||||||||
Totals |
2,130 |
247 |
462 |
173 |
26 |
63 |
66 |
27 |
43 |
17 |
3,254 |
A. Number of Appeals
B. Disposition of Appeals
A. 1. Number of appeals received in FY 2005 |
A. 2. Number of appeals processed in FY 2005 |
B.1. Number of appeals completely upheld |
B.2. Number of appeals partially upheld/partially reversed |
B.3. Number of appeals completely reversed |
B.4 Total Other Reasons for Non-Disclosure |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
OIG |
2 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
FAA |
72 |
92 |
31 |
13 |
9 |
39 |
FHWA |
17 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
FRA |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NHTSA |
7 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
FTA |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
SLSDC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MARAD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
RSPA |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PHMSA |
||||||
FMCSA |
13 |
15 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
BTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RITA |
||||||
Totals |
125 |
136 |
47 |
24 |
14 |
51 |
2. & 3. Number of times each FOIA exemption was used
FOIA Exemptions
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7(A) |
7(B) |
7(C) |
7(D) |
7(E) |
7(F) |
8 |
9 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
OIG |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FAA |
0 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
12 |
19 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FHWA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FRA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NHTSA |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FTA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SLSDC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MARAD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RSPA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PHMSA |
||||||||||||||
FMCSA |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
BTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RITA |
||||||||||||||
Totals |
0 |
5 |
3 |
15 |
18 |
32 |
6 |
0 |
14 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4. Other Reasons for Non-Disclosure
No records |
Referral |
Request with-drawn |
Fee related |
Not reasonably described |
Not a proper appeal |
Not an agency record |
Duplicate request |
Available from another source |
Remanded |
Total |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
OIG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
FAA |
10 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
39 |
FHWA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
FRA |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NHTSA |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
FTA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SLSDC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MARAD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RSPA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PHMSA |
|||||||||||
FMCSA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
BTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RITA |
|||||||||||
Totals |
15 |
0 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
51 |
A. Median processing time for requests processed during the fiscal year
B. Status of pending requests.
A.1. |
A.2. |
A.3. |
B. Status of |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number processed |
Median # of days |
Number processed |
Median # of days |
Number processed |
Median # of days |
Number pending |
Median # of days pending |
|
OST |
150 |
1 |
87 |
77 |
10 |
30 |
143 |
85 |
OIG |
50 |
8 |
34 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
108 |
FAA |
4,401 |
3 |
2,179 |
28 |
46 |
9 |
1,456 |
92 |
FHWA |
294 |
16 |
31 |
134 |
17 |
13 |
41 |
12 |
FRA |
0 |
N/A |
451 |
90 |
0 |
N/A |
106 |
55 |
NHTSA |
0 |
N/A |
263 |
20 |
0 |
N/A |
9 |
10 |
FTA |
199 |
29 |
0 |
N/A |
0 |
N/A |
11 |
28 |
SLSDC |
0 |
N/A |
33 |
20 |
0 |
N/A |
1 |
1 |
MARAD |
124 |
30 |
0 |
N/A |
0 |
N/A |
111 |
60 |
RSPA |
43 |
15 |
75 |
40 |
1 |
5 |
50 |
85 |
PHMSA |
||||||||
FMCSA |
0 |
N/A |
823 |
31 |
0 |
N/A |
97 |
17 |
BTS |
67 |
11 |
6 |
20 |
0 |
N/A |
1 |
180 |
RITA |
||||||||
Totals |
5,328 |
3,982 |
74 |
2,072 |
FY 2004 |
FY 2005 |
||
---|---|---|---|
A. |
Requests received |
10,375 |
9,597 |
B. |
Requests processed |
10,905 |
9,384 |
C. |
Comparison of median number of days requests were pending as of end of fiscal year |
Varies by component. |
D. Other narrative statements describing agency efforts to improve timeliness of FOIA performance and to make records available to the public.
The DOT received approximately 208 requests for expedited processing. Of those requests, 74 were afforded expedited processing.
Many DOT FOIA offices actively communicate with the requesters to effectively refine the scope of their request to better target more efficient searches.
The FAA continues to increase the types and volume of non-sensitive information available to the public on the Internet.
The FMCSA received more requests for processing during the reporting period, but maintained its response time. FMCSA also developed an internal additional tracking system to monitor the progress of each pending request.
At the end of the fiscal year, FHWA had upgraded its FOIA Database and was preparing to permit all of its field offices to use the database to record and track requests received directly by the field.
The OIG continues to improve its website by providing high profile products on its website as promptly as possible, as well as continuing to provide all of its public audit reports, Congressional testimonies, and correspondences on the website. The OIG provides monthly status reports to senior management which helps to keep the timely processing of FOIA requests a priority of the agency. Training was provided for OIG’s new FOIA Officer in FY 2005.
A. Staffing Levels
B. Total Costs (including staff and resources)
IX.A. Number of full-time Personnel |
IX.A. Number of Personnel with Part-time or occasional FOIA duties (in total work-years) |
IX.A. Total Number of Personnel (In work-years) |
IX.B. FOIA Processing |
IX.B. Litigation-related costs |
IX.B. TOTAL Costs |
X. Fees Collected |
X. % of total costs |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OST |
2.5 |
2.20 |
4.7 0 |
$431,211 |
$38,839 |
$470,050 |
$126 |
2.91% |
OIG |
.5 |
.875 |
1.375 |
$158,259 |
0 |
$158,259 |
0 |
|
FAA |
9 |
* 48.33 |
57.33 |
$4,540,740 |
$43,750 |
$4,584,490 |
$174,212 |
|
FHWA |
2 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
$395,319 |
0 |
$395,319 |
$13,096 |
|
FRA |
0 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
$201,937 |
0 |
$201,937 |
$1,052 |
|
NHTSA |
2 |
1.6 |
3.6 |
$339,040 |
$881 |
$339,921 |
$8,935 |
|
FTA |
0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
$144,888 |
0 |
$144,888 |
$1,829 |
|
SLSDC |
0 |
.24 |
.24 |
$23,061 |
0 |
$23,061 |
$246 |
|
MARAD |
1 |
1.10 |
2.10 |
$429,643 |
0 |
$429,643 |
$1,991 |
|
RSPA |
0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
$184,190 |
0 |
$184,190 |
$1,424 |
|
PHMSA |
||||||||
FMCSA |
5.5 |
.5 |
6.0 |
$402,229 |
0 |
$402,229 |
$12,622 |
|
BTS |
1 |
.40 |
1.40 |
$93,534 |
0 |
$93,534 |
$736 |
|
RITA |
||||||||
Totals |
23.5 |
* 63.345 |
86.845 |
$7,344,051 |
$83,470 |
$7,427,521 |
$216,269 |
* Increase from previous fiscal year due to a thorough accounting of all field personnel performing FOIA duties during the fiscal year.