[Federal Register: January 7, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 4)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 656-657]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07ja02-6]
[[Page 656]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
29 CFR Part 102
Revisions of Regulations Governing Stipulated Records Filed With
the Board or With the Board's Administrative Law Judges
AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations Board is amending its regulations
governing stipulated record cases to delete an outdated procedure for
filing stipulated records with its Administrative Law Judges and to
substitute an alternative procedure governing stipulated record cases
filed either with the Board or with an Administrative Law Judge.
DATES: Effective: January 7, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Toner, Executive Secretary,
(202) 273-1936.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 102.35(a)(9) of the National Labor
Relations Board's rules provides for a limited form of stipulation
before Administrative Law Judges in which, following a hearing,
transcripts are dispensed with and exceptions to findings of fact are
waived. 29 CFR 102.35(a)(9). This provision was adopted several decades
ago. It is never used today and was not used much at the time it was
adopted. For this reason, the Board has decided to eliminate this
procedure from its rules.
The Board has, on occasion, permitted parties to file stipulated
records directly with it along with requests that the stipulated cases
be decided without an evidentiary hearing. Typically these are cases in
which the facts are not in dispute and the parties wish expedited
consideration of what they perceive to be purely legal issues. Because
this practice has never been memorialized in the Board's rules, the
Board is adding it now. The same practice will also be made available
in proceedings before Administrative Law Judges.
In describing the procedures for submitting a stipulation of facts,
the rule states that a statement of the issues presented should be set
forth in the stipulation and that each party should also submit a short
statement (no more than three pages) of its position on the issues. The
Board's experience with stipulations of facts has been that, while the
parties know the contested issues and their positions on those issues,
a mere stipulation of facts by itself may not be sufficient to convey
that important information to the Board. Including a statement of
issues in the stipulation of facts and submitting a short statement of
each party's position on those issues will assist the Board in
determining whether it wishes to decide a case without the benefit of a
full hearing and a judge's decision.
For these reasons, the Board has decided to eliminate the former
Section 102.35(a)(9) and subtitute for it a brief statement outlining
the procedures for submitting stipulated records to it or to its
Administrative Law Judges.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because no notice of proposed rule-making is required for
procedural rules, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) pertaining to regulatory flexibility analysis do
not apply to these rules. However, even if the Regulatory Flexibility
Act were to apply, the NLRB certifies that these rules will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business
entities as they merely permit parties to a Board proceeding to submit
requests to have cases decided on a stipulated record.
Executive Order 12866
The regulatory review provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not
apply to independent regulatory agencies. However, even if they did,
the proposed changes in the Board's rules would not be classified as
``significant rules''' under Section 6 of Executive Order 12866,
because they will not result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises in domestic or foreign markets. Accordingly, no
regulatory impact assessment is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This part does not impose any reporting or record keeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102
Administrative practice and procedure, Labor management relations.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Labor
Relations Board is amending 29 CFR Chapter I, Part 102, as follows:
PART 102--RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8
1. The authority citation for part 102 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 6, National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29
U.S.C. 151, 156). Section 102.117 also issued under sec.
552(a)(4)(A) of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)), and section 442a(j) and (k) of the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 55a(j) and (k)). Sections 102.143 through 102.155 also issued
under sec. 504(c)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act as amended
(5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)).
2. Section 102.35 is amended by revising the heading and by further
revising paragraph (a)(9) to read as follows:
Sec. 102.35 Duties and powers of administrative law judges;
stipulations of cases to administrative law judges or to the Board;
assignment and powers of settlement judges.
(a) * * *
(9) To approve stipulations, including stipulations of facts that
waive a hearing and provide for a decision by the administrative law
judge. Alternatively, the parties may agree to waive a hearing and
decision by an administrative law judge and submit directly to the
Executive Secretary a stipulation of facts, which, if approved,
provides for a decision by the Board. A statement of the issues
presented should be set forth in the stipulation of facts and each
party should also submit a short statement (no
[[Page 657]]
more than three pages) of its position on the issues. If the
administrative law judge (or the Board) approves the stipulation, the
administrative law judge (or the Board) will set a time for the filing
of briefs. In proceedings before an administrative law judge, no
further briefs shall be filed except by special leave of the
administrative law judge. In proceedings before the Board, answering
briefs may be filed within 14 days, or such further period as the Board
may allow, from the last date on which an initial brief may be filed.
No further briefs shall be filed except by special leave of the Board.
At the conclusion of the briefing schedule, the judge (or the Board)
will decide the case or make other disposition of it.
* * * * *
Dated, Washington, DC, December 21, 2001.
By direction of the Board.
John J. Toner,
Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board.
[FR Doc. 02-80 Filed 1-4-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P