FHWA > Engineering > Construction > Contract Admin > NJ DOT Contractor Performance Rating System Procedure Pilot Program |
New Jersey DOT Contractor Performance Rating System Procedure
|
Rating Category | Category Weight |
---|---|
I. Progress Schedule | 20% |
II. Safety/Traffic Control/Environmental | 20% |
III. Contractor Project Management | 10% |
IV. Quality/Contract Compliance* | 50% |
*sub-category weights to be determined per project. |
The Contractor Performance Checklists will be completed by the Resident Engineer and/or project inspection personnel and will remain in the project file through completion of the contract. The Contractor Performance Checklists provide detailed information to be used by the Resident Engineer and Contractor in identifying non-compliance in methods, materials or performance that must be improved to provide acceptable quality. The level of importance of issued non-compliance notifications, as well as the frequency and duration of the notices, and resultant scoring of the other items of the checklists will be used to determine the Contractor Performance Rating ratings.
To maintain objectivity, the project specific Contractor Performance Check lists will be completed by the Resident Engineer and inspection personnel concurrent with the Contractor's execution of the work. Checklists will be completed by inspection personnel, as required, for a given work item. Any work item in non-compliance that will negatively impact project cost, schedule or duration will be photographed by inspection personnel and reported to the Resident Engineer. Upon submission of a checklist from inspection personnel indicating non-compliance, the Resident Engineer will immediately submit a Notice of Non-Compliance Form and checklist with the noted non-compliance item(s) to the Contractor. A Contractor receiving a Notice of Non-conformance Form may be required to submit a Corrective Action Plan, if noted on the Notice of Non-Compliance Form.
The Contractor Performance Checklists completed by Department personnel will be used as back-up data to substantiate the ratings. The documentation of problems and successes are an essential component of the rating system. The checklist and other documentation shall be used to provide reasoning for all ratings.
Documentation along with Interim Ratings should be used by the Contractor as a measure of project performance to date. The Interim Ratings will also provide the Contractor with the opportunity to make performance adjustments for future ratings during the construction of the project.
The following rating values will be applied to the Contractor Performance Rating Form to indicate Contractor degree of compliance (See Sample Contractor Rating Form) for the items noted:
CATEGORY I Progress Schedule | Degree of compliance |
---|---|
I.A. Submittal requirements: | |
100 % compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor non-compliance required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action. | 3 |
Rejected work - requiring total resubmission. | 1 |
I.B. Completion Dates specified: | |
Ahead of schedule by 5% | 5 |
Ahead of schedule | 4 |
Met the date specified | 3 |
Behind schedule by 5% | 2 |
Behind schedule by more than 5% | 1 |
I.C. All other requirements of the contract documents: | |
100 % compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor non-compliance required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major noncompliance requiring corrective action. | 2 |
Rejected work - requiring total resubmission. | 1 |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
CATEGORY II - Safety/Traffic Control/Environmental Compliance | |
II.A. OSHA and Contractor Safety Plan: | |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance - no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor - non-compliance - required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action. | 2 |
Work shut down necessary. | 1 |
II.B. Traffic Control Plan: | |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance - no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor - non-compliance - required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action. | 2 |
Work shut down necessary. | 1 |
II.C. Environmental Commitment/Health & Safety Plan: | |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance - no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor - non-compliance - required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action. | 2 |
Work shut down necessary. | 1 |
II.D. All other requirements of the contract documents: | |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance - no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor - non-compliance - required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action. | 2 |
Work shut down necessary. | 1 |
CATEGORY III - PROJECT MANAGEMENT | |
III.A. Key Staff: | |
Performs work without direction from Department | 5 |
Minor direction from Department personnel required. | 3 |
Constant attention/direction required by Department | 1 |
III.B. Fulfillment of State/Federal Requirements: | |
Complied with time frames/submission of paperwork without errors. | 5 |
Complied with time frames/minor errors/one resubmission required. | 3 |
Paperwork late/numerous errors/numerous re-submissions required. | 1 |
III.C. Coordination of Staff: | |
Effectively coordinates the work with good communication, planning and organization. | 5 |
Coordinates work with good communication, planning and organization with some minor problems. | 3 |
Ineffective coordination of the work. | 1 |
III.D. Coordination of work w/Department and other Agencies: | |
Effectively coordinates the work with good communication, planning and organization. | 5 |
Coordinates work with good communication, planning and organization with some minor problems. | 3 |
Ineffective coordination of the work. | 1 |
III.E. All other requirements of Contract Documents: | |
Effectively coordinates the work with good communication, planning and organization. | 5 |
Coordinates work with good communication, planning and organization with some minor problems. | 3 |
Ineffective coordination of the work. | 1 |
IV. Quality/Contract Compliance - Project Specific Rating Work Items: (to be determined prior to bids) | |
100% compliance - without corrective action. | 5 |
Minor non-compliance - no corrective action required. | 4 |
Minor - non-compliance - required minor corrective action | 3 |
Major non-compliance requiring corrective action and/or assessed penalty. | 2 |
Rejected work - requiring removal and replacement. | 1 |
Category IV Quality/Contract Compliance will consist of the project specific subcategories comprising the work disciplines or Project Specific Rating Work Items of the project. All performance evaluations for this category will vary based on the work items of the project. The NJDOT Bureau of Contract Administration will prepare and provide the project specific subcategories to be included in The Contractor Performance Rating for each contract.
The project specific Contractor Performance Rating package will be available to interested Contractors prior to bids and included as part of the bid documents. The project specific Contractor Performance Rating package will include:
Work performed by subcontractors will not be rated independently. The work of subcontractors will be rated and included in the Prime Contractor's performance evaluation.
A computer database will be developed to facilitate data entry, generation of reports, ratings and schedule tracking.
The Contractor Performance Rating will be determined from:
Contractor Performance Checklists along with documentation, severity of flagged items, as well as, frequency and duration of non-compliance will determine the Category Rating. The category weights will be applied to the Category Rating to determine the Contractor Rating. (See Contractor Rating Calculations Form page 10).
With establishment of the Contractor Performance Rating System, the NJDOT Division of Procurement will take into consideration the Contractor Performance Ratings while determining Contractor pre-qualification. Further details concerning use of ratings relative to Contractor pre-qualification will be developed and released at a later date by the Division of Procurement.
The following data will be generated for each Contractor:
The Contractor shall provide a Corrective Action Plan for ratings lower than satisfactory (3.0), by letter to the Resident Engineer, enumerating the procedures/processes which the Contractor intends to institute to resolve the problems and issues causing the low rating. The Corrective Action Plan shall include procedures to prevent recurrence(s) of non-compliance and or quality issues and must be approved by the Resident Engineer.
Ratings lower than 3.0 will affect a Contractor's bid status with the Department in the following manner:
The Contractor may request a rating review within 14 days from receipt of an Interim Rating that is lower than 3.0. The Contractor shall submit a written request to the Regional Construction Engineer within the 14-day period for a rating de-briefing meeting. The submitted request must include the Contractor's basis for the de-briefing. The Regional Construction Engineer will schedule the debriefing meeting; the debriefing will include review of the rating, rating justification(s) and Corrective Action(s) and required quality improvement(s) to be implemented.
The Resident Engineer and Field Manager along with the Contractor's Key Staff, which shall include the project Field Manager/Supervisor and a senior Administration staff member, will be required to attend the meeting.
An incentive payment for above satisfactory performance will be included in the Special Provisions for each project based on the overall project bid amount and the following:
Contractor Final Rating | Bonus Percentage |
---|---|
5.0 | 5.00 |
4.9 | 4.75 |
4.8 | 4.50 |
4.7 | 4.25 |
4.6 | 4.00 |
4.5 | 3.75 |
4.4 | 3.50 |
4.3 | 3.25 |
4.2 | 3.00 |
4.1 | 2.75 |
4.0 | 2.50 |
3.9 | 2.25 |
3.8 | 2.00 |
3.7 | 1.75 |
3.6 | 1.50 |
3.5 | 1.25 |
3.4 | 1.00 |
3.3 | 0.75 |
3.2 | 0.50 |
3.1 | 0.25 |
3.0 | 0.00 |
Contractor | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resident Engineer | ||||||
Project | Date | |||||
Category | Factor | Category Rating | Factor Rating | |||
I | Progress Schedule | 0.20 | x | 5 | = | 1.0 |
II | Safety/Traffic Control/Environmental | 0.20 | x | 4 | = | 0.8 |
III | Project Management | 0.10 | x | 3 | = | 0.3 |
IV | Quality/Contract Compliance | 0.50 | x | 3.4* | = | 1.7 |
Contractor Rating (sum of I-IV) | 3.8 |
Subcategory | Percentage ** | Rating | Factor Rating | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Milling | 10 | x | 5 | 0.5 |
Paving Bituminous Beam | 70 | x | 3 | 2.1 |
Guiderail/End Treatments | 15 | x | 4 | 0.6 |
All other categories not listed above | 5 | x | 4 | 0.2 |
Quality/Contract Compliance Rating | 3.4* | |||
(* Sum of Subcategories ¾ Number to be inserted in IV above) ** Value from Bid Package |
Resident Engineer | ||
---|---|---|
Project | Date | |
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
I. | Progress Schedule - Category Weight 20% | Indicate degree 0 to 5 |
A. submittal requirements | ||
B. completion dates specified | ||
C. all other requirements of the Contract Documents*. | ||
Total for category = | ||
II. | Safety/Traffic Control/Environmental Compliance - Category Weight 20% | |
A. OSHA and Safety Plan | ||
B. Traffic Control Plan | ||
C. Environmental Commitment (including Asbestos Abatement Checklist items, where applicable) | ||
D. all other requirements of the Contract Documents | ||
Total for category= | ||
III. | Project Management - Category Weight 10% | |
A. Key staff (subsections 105.07, 105.08) | ||
B. Fulfillment of State/Federal requirements (107.07, 107.08 & proposal attachments) | ||
C. Coordination of staff (subcontractors, suppliers, etc.) | ||
D. Coordination of work with Department and other agencies | ||
E. All other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for category= |
* "All other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the Contract Documents and good construction practices for the following major work items: | ||
1 | **Project specific major work items: | Indicate degree 0 to 5 |
A. | ||
B | ||
C. | ||
D. all other contract items(Contractor Performance Checklists) | ||
*Total for category = |
*Refer to Contractor Rating Calculation Form
**The type of work items and weights for these items will be assigned on a project to project basis.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. gradation | |
B. compaction | ||
C. grade control | ||
D. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for category = | ||
Average for category = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. smoothness | |
B. thickness | ||
C. air voids | ||
D. tack coat | ||
E. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. texture | |
B. depth | ||
C. profile | ||
D. cross slope | ||
E. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. smoothness | |
B. curing | ||
C. reinforcement steel | ||
D. joints | ||
E. strength | ||
F. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. concrete strength | |
B. plan dimensions and details | ||
C curing | ||
D. smoothness | ||
E. foundations | ||
F. reinforcement steel | ||
G. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. grade control | |
B. compaction | ||
C joints | ||
D. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. signal installation | |
B. wiring | ||
C. lighting installation | ||
D. conduit | ||
E. all other requirements of the Contract Documents *. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. end treatment installation | |
B. guide rail installation | ||
C. rub rail installation | ||
D. grading | ||
E. all other requirements of the Contract Documents. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All - other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. topsoil | |
B. planting material | ||
C. grading | ||
D. fertilizing and seeding | ||
E. warranty | ||
F. all other requirements of the Contract Documents. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. thickness | |
B. width | ||
C. retroreflectance | ||
D. all other requirements of the Contract Documents. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Contractor: | ||
---|---|---|
Resident Engineer: | ||
Project: | Date: | |
Rating category Weight: | ||
To what degree did the Contractor comply with the following requirements: | ||
Indicate degree 0 to 5 | ||
1 | A. location | |
B. positioning | ||
C. sheeting | ||
D. all other requirements of the Contract Documents. | ||
Total for subcategory = | ||
Average for subcategory = |
*average will be taken, except when degree indicated is lower than 3, the lowest degree shown will be used for the subcategory.
* "All other requirements of the Contract Documents" are defined as the items of the Contractor Performance Checklists rated, and considered by their level of importance relative to the project.
Jerry Yakowenko
Office of Program Administration
202-366-1562
E-mail Jerry