SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. Litigation Release No. 15834 / August 6, 1998 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ANINDYA N. BAKRIE, Civil Action No. 98 CIV 5570 (AGS) (S.D.N.Y.) (filed August 6, 1998) On August 6, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") filed an insider trading complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Anindya N. Bakrie ("Bakrie"), a former junior financial analyst in the Global Power Group of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.'s New York office ("Salomon"). The Commission's complaint alleges that Bakrie, an Indonesian national, engaged in insider trading in a company that was involved in merger negotiations for which Salomon's Global Power Group was participating as an adviser. Specifically, the complaint alleges that: * On September 5, 1997, Bakrie asked his friend, Roy Handojo, to purchase common stock of Washington Gas Light Company ("Washington Gas") on Bakrie's behalf, promising to share any resulting profits with Handojo. * At the time, Washington Gas was engaged in confidential merger negotiations with a potential acquirer, Consolidated Natural Gas Company ("Consolidated"), for which Salomon, including its Global Power Group, was serving as investment banker. * On September 5, 1997, Handojo purchased 25,000 shares of Washington Gas common stock for a total investment of $650,000. * In the days prior to September 5, Bakrie had learned through Salomon that a merger announcement was imminent. * Bakrie had also performed limited work on the transaction for Salomon in August 1997. * On September 7, 1997, Bakrie learned through Salomon that the merger was no longer likely. * Immediately thereafter, Bakrie told Handojo that he had changed his mind about purchasing Washington Gas stock. * Over the next two days, September 8 and 9, 1997, Handojo sold all of the Washington Gas stock, incurring a $13,869 loss. On September 12, 1997, the Commission filed an emergency civil action against Handojo in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York concerning unrelated allegations of insider trading (SEC v. Handojo, 97 Civ. 6805 (LAP)). See Lit. Rel. Nos. 15492 and 15540. That same day, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York arrested Handojo for the same conduct alleged in the Commission's complaint in SEC v. Handojo. According to the complaint in SEC v. Bakrie: * Within a week after Handojo's arrest, Bakrie abruptly returned to Indonesia to work for the Bakrie Group, which is an Indonesian conglomerate engaged in the business of, among other things, raising capital in the international markets and providing financial advisory services. * Bakrie resigned from Salomon shortly after returning to Indonesia. The Commission's complaint seeks a permanent injunction against Bakrie for violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and civil penalties. Simultaneously with the filing of the Commission's complaint, Bakrie consented, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and ordering him to pay a $40,000 civil penalty.