UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15817 / July 20, 1998 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Solv-Ex Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. Civ. 98-860-LH (USDC D. New Mexico) The Commission announced the filing today of an injunctive action against a New Mexico corporation and two of its officers and directors for disseminating fraudulent statements concerning the nature and extent of the company's products and the status of its purported proprietary technological processes. Named as defendants were Solv-Ex Corporation, its Chief Executive Officer, John S. Rendall ("Rendall"), and the company's vice-president, Herbert M. Campbell II (Campbell"). The complaint, filed in federal district court in Albuquerque, New Mexico, alleges that from January 1995 though April 1997, Solv-Ex, Rendall and Campbell represented that the company's plant in Alberta, Canada had developed operational technology which produced salable bitumen from oil sands on a commercial scale, that this bitumen extraction process also yielded industrial minerals of marketable quality and volume, and that Solv-Ex had successfully tested a revolutionary electrolytic cell capable of producing metallic aluminum. Contrary to these statements, according to the complaint, Solv-Ex's bitumen extraction process has at all times been in the research and development stage, and the company's attempts to recover industrial minerals from that process, pursued only on an experimental basis to date, have failed to yield any commercially viable product. Further, the Commission's complaint alleges that Solv-Ex's single test of the electrolytic cell, in 1996, was a failure. According to the Commission's complaint, while these false and misleading statements were being disseminated by Solv- Ex, Rendall and Campbell, the price of the company's stock, which traded on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market, rose from approximately $5 per share to $38 per share. The Commission's complaint alleges that Solv-Ex and Rendall violated the antifraud and issuer reporting provisions, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Campbell is alleged to have violated the antifraud provisions and to have aided and abetted the issuer reporting violations.