US. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15800 / July 6, 1998 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1051 / July 6, 1998 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PAUL R. SAFRONCHIK, JEROME A. ADAMO, and DOUGLAS A. ROY, Civil Action No. SACV 98-416-GLT (EEx) (C.D. Cal., S. Dist.): UNITED STATES v. DOUGLAS ANDREW ROY, SA CR 97-61-GLT In a criminal prosecution by the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, on June 29, 1998, Judge Gary L. Taylor, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, sentenced Douglas A. Roy (Roy) to serve six months home detention, three years probation, and pay $31,000 in restitution. From August 1993 through September 1995, Roy was the controller of Home Theater Products International, Inc. (HTPI). On September 15, 1997, Roy pleaded guilty to an information filed by the United States Attorney for the Central District of California charging him with conspiracy to commit securities fraud by fraudulently inflating HTPI s accounts receivable. United States v. Douglas Andrew Roy, SA CR 97-61-GLT. Roy is the second of three senior executives of HTPI to be sentenced. Jerome A. Adamo, the former president of HTPI, pled guilty on February 4, 1998 to insider trading and was sentenced to serve six months home detention, two years probation and to pay a $50,000 fine. United States v. Jerome A. Adamo, SA CR 98+2. Paul R. Safronchik, the former chairman of HTPI, pleaded guilty to conspiracy, bank fraud and securities fraud on December 9, 1996, and is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Taylor on August 3, 1998. United States v. Pablo Reuben Safronchik, aka Paul R. Safronchik, SA CR 96+141+GLT. In a related civil action by the Commission, on June 3, 1998, Judge Taylor permanently enjoined Roy from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2, thereunder. Roy consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to a final judgment permanently enjoining him and ordering him to pay disgorgement but waiving such payment based upon his demonstrated inability to pay. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul R. Safronchik, Jerome A. Adamo, and Douglas A. Roy, Civil Action No. SACV 98-416-GLT (EEx)] (LR-15738; AAER 15738) ======END OF PAGE 1======