UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15608 / January 6, 1998

     ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
     RELEASE NO. 1004 / January 6, 1998

     SEC V. INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGIES, CORP., F/K/A MOBILE
     SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CORP., JAMES C. COBBAN, JAMES M. ROBINSON AND
     JONATHAN D. BENNETT, Civil Action No. 96-8490-CIV-HURLEY/LYNCH

          The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that
     on December 18, 1997, Final Judgments of Permanent Injunctions were entered
     against James C. Cobban ("Cobban"), James M. Robinson ("Robinson") and
     Jonathan D. Bennett ("Bennett") (collectively, the "defendants") by the
     United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  The
     Final Judgments enjoin Cobban and Robinson from future violations of
     Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and
     Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-2, promulgated thereunder, and enjoins Bennett from
     future violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5,
     thereunder.  The Final Judgments did not order Cobban, Robinson and Bennett
     to pay civil penalties based on their demonstrated financial inability to
     pay.  Cobban, Robinson and Bennett are all former officers and directors of
     International Communications & Technologies, Corp., f/k/a Mobile Services
     International Corporation ("Mobile Services"), a mobile telecommunications
     company formerly based in Boca Raton, Florida.  The defendants consented to
     the entry of the Final Judgments without admitting or denying the
     Commission's allegations.

          The Commission's Complaint, filed on July 3, 1996, alleged that Mobile
     Services made false filings with the Commission during fiscal years 1993
     and 1994.  Specifically, the Complaint alleged that Mobile Services valued
     certain franchise rights as exceeding $4 million, when, in truth, these
     franchise rights were worthless; the allegedly overvalued assets
     represented over 80 percent of Mobile Services' assets.  The Complaint
     alleged that the defendants knew that the franchisor was defunct, with the
     result that the franchise rights were materially impaired when the filings
     were made.  The Complaint also alleged that Cobban and Robinson made false
     and misleading statements and omissions to Mobile Services' independent
     auditor in connection with his audit of the company's 1993 financial
     statements.  The Complaint further alleged that Mobile Services failed to
     make and keep books and records which accurately and fairly reflected its
     financial and accounting transactions.