FTA Logo
Skip Navigation

Last Updated: January 29, 2007

Site Map | Web Accessibility | FAQs | United We Ride | Contact Us
About FTA
News & Events
Planning & Environment
Grants & Financing
Legislation, Regulations & Guidance
Research, Technical Assistance & Training
Civil Rights & Accessibility
Reports & Publications
Safety & Security
Regional Offices Regional Map of United States
Click on the Region to view each page.
You are here:Home |Grants & Financing |Third Party Procurement |Frequently Asked Questions: Third Party Procurement | Requirements Contracts

Requirements Contracts



Q. I would like to know (given the background info) if there should have been a written contract or not, and if a contract is required, then what is the reason for it? An IFB was issued by us in 1999 for the purchase of various types of buses (total quantity 350, but this quantity was not specific to any particular type/size of bus). After receipt of offers, a PO was issued to bidder X for a partial quantity (say 35 out of total of 350). Subsequently, we have processed additional PO's to meet our requirements, total quantity say 180). Our Purchasing staff has not issued a contract (Requirements contract?). Their position is that the PO is sufficient.

A. We would agree that a "Requirements" contract should have been advertised as such and issued if that was the intent of your agency. The BPPM discusses these contract types in Sections 2.4.5.2* - Requirements Contracts, and 2.4.5.3** - Indefinite-quantity Contracts. It is important to note the FTA policy that such contracts contain maximum quantities and not be "open-ended," where no maximum quantity is stated. This open-ended situation has led to serious problems. Orders above the stated maximum in the contract must be processed as "new procurements" and not "change orders" since they are outside the scope of the original competition.

The procedure of issuing individual purchase orders would seem to say there may be no contractual understanding of a maximum quantity that can be ordered under the umbrella of the original competition. We would also be concerned about the prices being paid under each of the individual purchase orders. Was there a basic contract signed with this vendor, based on the original competition, committing the vendor to specific bus prices for a stated period of time? If the prices now being established in these purchase orders are being negotiated as the needs are being defined, we would say that these purchase orders are not competitive since the prices are not established on the basis of the original competition.


____________
* Section 2.4.5.2 of the BPPM is available on the Internet.

** Section 2.4.5.3 of the BPPM is available on the Internet.
 



Submit a Question or Suggestion/Issue
Submit a Technical Issue on this page
Home | Related Links | FOIA | DOT.gov | WhiteHouse.gov | USA.gov | OIG Hotline | Regulations.gov | FTA Web Policies | Privacy Policy | No FEAR
Adobe Acrobat Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer
Region I Region II Region III Region IV Region V Region VII Region VI Region VIII Region IX Region X Region X Region IX LMRO