Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Primer Contents
En español
 
Preface
About the Primer
 
Principles & Techniques
 
Why Evaluate?
Types of Evaluation
Evaluation Design
Measure of Effectiveness
 
Evaluation & Research
 
Designing and Testing
Review and Pretesting
Pretest Methods
Print Materials
Sample Survey
Group Case Study
Pretest Results
Using Pretest Results
Special Populations
Risk Message Checklist
 
Outcomes & Impacts
 
Assessment Questions
Evaluation Options
Midcourse Reviews
Have We Succeeded?
Evaluation Case Example
Evaluation Action Plan
Effective Program
 
Selected References
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Methyl Parathion
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Evaluation Primer on Health Risk Communication Programs

Barriers to Risk Communication Evaluation


(Arkin 1991)

Every program manager faces constraints to undertaking optimal evaluation tasks, just as there are constraints to designing other aspects of a risk communication program.

These constraints may include the following:

  • limited funds
  • limited staff time and capabilities
  • length of time allotted to the program
  • limited access to computer facilities
  • agency restrictions to hiring consultants or contractors
  • policies limiting the ability to gather information from the public
  • management perceptions regarding the value of evaluation
  • levels of management support for well designed evaluation activities
  • difficulties in defining (or establishing) agency consensus regarding the objectives of the program
  • difficulties in designing appropriate measures for risk communication programs
  • difficulties in separating the effects of program influences from other influences on the target audience in "real world" situations.

[Top of Page]