FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
(816) 285-7000
FOR RELEASE:
June 24, 2008


Minimum Wage Workers in Missouri: 2007 (PDF)

In 2007, 33,000 hourly-paid workers in Missouri had earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage1, according to the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. (See chart A.) Regional Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that workers paid at or below the Federal minimum wage accounted for 2.1 percent of the 1.6 million hourly-paid wage and salary workers in Missouri2. Fifteen States had a lower percentage of workers in this pay range than did Missouri. (See table 1.)

Chart A.  Employed wage and salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage in Missouri, annual averages, 2000-07
Employed wage and  salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing  Federal minimum wage in Missouri, annual averages

According to 2007 Current Population Survey (CPS) estimates, 75.9 million workers in the United States were paid at hourly rates, representing 58.5 percent of all wage and salary workers. Of those paid by the hour, 267,000 were reported as earning exactly the prevailing Federal minimum wage. Nearly another 1.5 million were reported as earning wages below the minimum3 . Together, these 1.7 million workers with wages at or below the Federal minimum made up 2.3 percent of all hourly-paid workers in the nation.

The number of hourly-paid workers in Missouri earning the prevailing Federal minimum wage or less was 33,000 in 2007, down from a peak of 58,000 in 2003. Women accounted for 64 percent (21,000) of the hourly-paid workers who earned the prevailing Federal minimum wage or less in Missouri in 2007, while men accounted for the remainder (12,000). In 2007, 2.5 percent of all women workers were earning at or below the Federal minimum, down considerably from a peak of 5.1 percent in 2003. In comparison, only 1.6 percent of male workers earned at or below the Federal minimum wage in 2007, compared with 2.1 percent in 2003. (See table A and chart B.)

Chart B.  Percentage of employed wage and salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage in Missouri, by sex, annual averages, 2000-07
Percentage of employed wage and salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage in Missouri, by sex, annual averages

Overall, Missouri wage and salary workers that received hourly rates4 had median hourly earnings of $11.79 in 2007; nationally, the median was $11.95. The wage differential between men and women in Missouri was greater than the national average, with 2007 median hourly rates for men and for women in the State at $13.45 and $10.50, respectively. (See table A.) For the United States as a whole, the comparable figures were $12.95 for men and $10.98 for women.


Table A. Employed wage and salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage, and median earnings of all hourly-paid workers in Missouri, annual averages, 2000-2007
Missouri At or below Federal minimum wage (number of workers in thousands) All hourly-paid workers
Total Below Prevailing At Prevailing Number of workers (in thousands) Median earnings (in dollars)
Total

2000

39 30 9 1,547 $10.32

2001

47 39 8 1,629 10.62

2002

48 38 10 1,602 10.81

2003

58 45 13 1,586 11.20

2004

42 33 9 1,601 11.05

2005

56 41 15 1,613 11.15

2006

36 24 12 1,581 11.58

2007

33 30 3 1,577 11.79
Men

2000

12 7 5 767 $11.92

2001

18 16 2 811 12.24

2002

14 10 4 799 12.56

2003

16 13 3 769 12.39

2004

13 11 2 765 12.77

2005

19 9 10 789 12.78

2006

8 6 2 772 13.00

2007

12 11 1 742 13.45
Women

2000

28 23 5 779 $9.19

2001

29 23 6 818 9.74

2002

35 28 7 803 9.78

2003

42 32 10 817 10.28

2004

28 22 6 836 10.09

2005

36 31 5 823 10.06

2006

27 17 10 808 10.42

2007

21 19 2 835 10.50

Note: All self-employed persons are excluded, regardless of whether or not their business is incorporated.


Among the states, Mississippi, at 4.5 percent, had the highest proportion of hourly-paid workers earning at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage in 2007, followed by Louisiana, at 4.3 percent. Texas, Massachusetts, and South Carolina had the next highest shares, 4.0 percent each. California, Montana, Oregon, and Washington had the lowest shares, each with less than 1 percent of hourly-paid workers earning the Federal minimum or below. It should be noted that as of January 1, 2008, 32 states and the District of Columbia had laws establishing minimum wage standards that exceeded the Federal level of $5.85 per hour5. (See table 1 and chart C.)

Chart C. Minimum wage laws in the States, January 1, 2008
Chart C.  Minimum wage laws in the States

Footnotes

1. On July 24, 2007, the Federal minimum wage increased to $5.85 per hour from $5.15 per hour. Data in this report reflect the average number of workers earning the prevailing Federal minimum wage or less for the year -those who earned $5.15 or less from January 2007 through July 2007 and those who earned $5.85 or less from August 2007 through the end of the year.

2. Data are for wage and salary workers, excluding the incorporated self-employed, and refer to earnings on a person's sole or principal job.

3. It should be noted that the presence of a sizable number of workers with reported wages below the minimum does not necessarily indicate violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as there are exemptions to the minimum wage provisions in the law.

4. Wage rates in this release use median values. The median is the middle of a distribution: half the scores are above the median and half are below the median. The median is less sensitive to extreme wages than the mean; this makes it a better measure than the mean for highly skewed distributions.

5. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division: www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm.

Technical Note

The Bureau of Labor Statistics' data on minimum wage earners are derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS), a nationwide sample survey of households that includes questions enabling the identification of hourly-paid workers and their hourly wage rate. Data in this summary are annual averages.

Minimum wage data, particularly levels, for each year are not strictly comparable with data for earlier years because of the introduction of revised population controls used in the CPS. The effect of the revised population controls on the minimum wage estimates is unknown. However, the effect of the new controls in 2007 on the monthly CPS estimates for the U.S. was to increase the December 2006 employment level by 153,000 and the unemployment level by 10,000. The updated controls had little or no effect on unemployment rates and other ratios. For additional information, see "Adjustments to Household Survey Population Estimates in January 2007" in the February 2007 issue of Employment and Earnings, available on the Internet at www.bls.gov/cps/cps07adj.pdf.

It should be noted that the presence of a sizable number of workers with reported wages below the minimum does not necessarily indicate violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as there are exemptions to the minimum wage provisions of the law. The estimates of the numbers of minimum and subminimum wage workers presented in the accompanying tables pertain to workers paid at hourly rates; salaried and other non-hourly workers are excluded. As such, the actual number of workers with earnings at or below the prevailing minimum is undoubtedly understated. Research has shown that a relatively smaller number and share of salaried workers and others not paid by the hour have earnings that, when translated into hourly rates, are at or below the minimum wage. However, BLS does not routinely estimate hourly earnings for non-hourly workers because of data concerns that arise in producing these estimates. For further information, see Steven Haugen and Earl Mellor, "Estimating the number of minimum wage workers," Monthly Labor Review, January 1990 (PDF 415K).

The prevailing Federal minimum wage was $2.90 in 1979, $3.10 in 1980, and $3.35 in 1981-89. The minimum wage rose to $3.80 in April 1990, $4.25 in April 1991, $4.75 in October 1996, and $5.15 in September 1997. On July 24, 2007, the Federal minimum wage increased to $5.85 per hour from $5.15 per hour. Data in this report reflect the average number of workers earning the prevailing Federal minimum wage or less for the year (those who earned $5.15 or less from January 2007 through July 2007 and those who earned $5.85 or less from August 2007 through the end of the year).

This release is available on our Web site at www.bls.gov/ro7/. If you have additional questions, you can contact the Mountain-Plains Information Office at 816-285-7000. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.


Table 1. Employed wage and salary workers paid hourly rates with earnings at or below the prevailing Federal minimum wage by State, 2007 annual averages
State Number of workers (in thousands) Percent distribution Percent of workers paid hourly rates
Total paid hourly rates At or below minimum wage Total paid hourly rates At or below minimum wage At or below minimum wage
Total At minimum wage Below minimum wage Total At minimum wage Below minimum wage Total At minimum wage Below minimum wage

Total, 16 years and over

75,873 1,729 267 1,462 100 100 100 100 2.3 0.4 1.9

Alabama

1,132 37 14 23 1.5 2.1 5.2 1.6 3.3 1.2 2

Alaska

197 2 - 2 0.3 0.1 - 0.1 1 - 1

Arizona

1,560 28 2 26 2.1 1.6 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.1 1.7

Arkansas

677 17 1 16 0.9 1 0.4 1.1 2.5 0.1 2.4

California

8,785 74 9 65 11.6 4.3 3.4 4.4 0.8 0.1 0.7

Colorado

1,164 25 1 24 1.5 1.4 0.4 1.6 2.1 0.1 2.1

Connecticut

923 14 - 14 1.2 0.8 - 1 1.5 - 1.5

Delaware

234 5 - 5 0.3 0.3 - 0.3 2.1 - 2.1

District of Columbia

109 3 1 2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 2.8 0.9 1.8

Florida

4,261 114 15 99 5.6 6.6 5.6 6.8 2.7 0.4 2.3

Georgia

2,216 70 11 59 2.9 4 4.1 4 3.2 0.5 2.7

Hawaii

338 4 - 4 0.4 0.2 - 0.3 1.2 - 1.2

Idaho

424 12 4 8 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.5 2.8 0.9 1.9

Illinois

3,335 74 3 71 4.4 4.3 1.1 4.9 2.2 0.1 2.1

Indiana

1,826 36 7 29 2.4 2.1 2.6 2 2 0.4 1.6

Iowa

933 24 2 22 1.2 1.4 0.7 1.5 2.6 0.2 2.4

Kansas

796 25 5 20 1 1.4 1.9 1.4 3.1 0.6 2.5

Kentucky

1,152 35 9 26 1.5 2 3.4 1.8 3 0.8 2.3

Louisiana

937 40 17 23 1.2 2.3 6.4 1.6 4.3 1.8 2.5

Maine

399 9 - 9 0.5 0.5 - 0.6 2.3 - 2.3

Maryland

1,317 27 2 25 1.7 1.6 0.7 1.7 2.1 0.2 1.9

Massachusetts

1,505 60 2 58 2 3.5 0.7 4 4 0.1 3.9

Michigan

2,678 58 1 57 3.5 3.4 0.4 3.9 2.2 0 2.1

Minnesota

1,565 21 2 19 2.1 1.2 0.7 1.3 1.3 0.1 1.2

Mississippi

691 31 16 15 0.9 1.8 6 1 4.5 2.3 2.2

Missouri

1,577 33 3 30 2.1 1.9 1.1 2.1 2.1 0.2 1.9

Montana

289 1 - 1 0.4 0.1 - 0.1 0.3 - 0.3

Nebraska

553 17 3 14 0.7 1 1.1 1 3.1 0.5 2.5

Nevada

747 12 3 9 1 0.7 1.1 0.6 1.6 0.4 1.2

New Hampshire

372 9 1 8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 2.4 0.3 2.2

New Jersey

1,697 29 4 25 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.7 0.2 1.5

New Mexico

479 11 2 9 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 2.3 0.4 1.9

New York

4,078 88 7 81 5.4 5.1 2.6 5.5 2.2 0.2 2

North Carolina

2,156 46 4 42 2.8 2.7 1.5 2.9 2.1 0.2 1.9

North Dakota

191 5 2 3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 2.6 1 1.6

Ohio

3,422 79 5 74 4.5 4.6 1.9 5.1 2.3 0.1 2.2

Oklahoma

849 25 10 15 1.1 1.4 3.7 1 2.9 1.2 1.8

Oregon

1,050 9 2 7 1.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.7

Pennsylvania

3,434 69 3 66 4.5 4 1.1 4.5 2 0.1 1.9

Rhode Island

315 7 - 7 0.4 0.4 - 0.5 2.2 - 2.2

South Carolina

1,178 47 10 37 1.6 2.7 3.7 2.5 4 0.8 3.1

South Dakota

241 6 1 5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 2.5 0.4 2.1

Tennesee

1,602 39 10 29 2.1 2.3 3.7 2 2.4 0.6 1.8

Texas

5,585 221 46 175 7.4 12.8 17.2 12 4 0.8 3.1

Utah

748 11 1 10 1 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.5 0.1 1.3

Vermont

181 4 - 4 0.2 0.2 - 0.3 2.2 - 2.2

Virginia

1,761 46 5 41 2.3 2.7 1.9 2.8 2.6 0.3 2.3

Washington

1,844 17 3 14 2.4 1 1.1 1 0.9 0.2 0.8

West Virginia

478 16 9 7 0.6 0.9 3.4 0.5 3.3 1.9 1.5

Wisconsin

1,730 32 4 28 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.8 0.2 1.6

Wyoming

164 4 1 3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 2.4 0.6 1.8

NOTE: Data exclude all self-employed persons regardless of whether or not their businesses are incorporated. Users are reminded that these data are based on a sample and are therefore subject to sampling error; the degree of error may be quite large for less populous States. It is not possible to clearly determine whether workers surveyed in the CPS are actually covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or by individual State minimum wage laws. Thus, some workers reported as earning an hourly wage of $5.15 may not in fact be covered by Federal or State minimum wage laws. At the same time, the presence of a sizable number of workers with wages below the prevailing Federal minimum wage does not necessarily indicate violations of the FLSA or applicable State laws, because there are numerous exclusions and exemptions to these minimum wage statutes. Dash indicates no data or data that do not meet publication criteria.

 

Last Modified Date: June 24, 2008