image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout image used for layout
US Department of Transportation Home Layout Image Home Button Site Index Button Issue Briefs Button FOIA Button Employment Button image used for layout
About the FRA
Safety
Freight Rail
Passenger Rail
Research & Development
Press Room
Legislation, Regulation, Litigation.
Civil Rights & Accessibility


DOT Site Search:

FRA-only 

The Federal Railroad Administration Passenger train traveling through New England, autumn
landscape.

Other PTC Developments

Since 2001, the efforts to deploy PTC on various railroads have accelerated. These deployments were mostly started with development specific to the territory and the type of service the system would be installed to operate on (e.g., passenger service). These systems also vary in their implementations of the basic functionalities of a PTC system (i.e. to enforce authority and speed, as well as to protect roadway workers). Even the design of each system tends to be unique. Some systems use track transponders, mainly on passenger lines, to track trains. Others use GPS, supplemented by onboard devices for tracking. A few systems employ a centralized office system to perform major safety-critical functions, but others choose local distributed systems with peer-to-peer communication between a train and the wayside interface units. Some railroads elected to develop vital systems with safety-critical and fail-safe implementation. Others started with a non-vital overlay system where the protection relies mainly on the base system with an additional layer of protection from the PTC overlay. When the PTC overlay fails, the system is protected by the original base system. Generally, the non-vital overlay systems are less expensive to deploy.

The table below lists the various PTC systems that have been deployed or are under development and test, as of January 2007.

 PROJECT

 STAKEHOLDER

 RAIL CORRIDOR

 MILES

 STATUS

 CBTM I  CSXT  Spartanburg SC - Augusta, GA

 138.6

 Revenue
 CBTMII  CSXT  Spartanburg SC - Erwin, TN

 110

 Test
 ETMS I  BNSF/FRA  Beardstown - Centralia, IL

 130

 Revenue
 ETMS II  BNSF/FRA  Fort Worth, TX - Oklahoma City, OK

 115

 Test
 ITCS  AMTRAK/MDOT/FRA  Niles - Kalamazoo, MI

 66

 Revenue
 NAJPTC  AAR/IDOT/FRA  Springfield - Chicago,IL

 123

 Terminated
 NAJPTC  RRF/FRA  TTCI, Pueblo, CO

 Test Track

 Development
 CAS  AKRR/FRA  Anchorage - Fairbanks, AK

 350

 Development
 ACSES  AMTRAK  Boston, MA - New Haven, CT

 198

 Revenue
 ACSES  AMTRAK  New Haven, CT - New York City, NY

 75

 Revenue
 OTC  NS  Columbia-Charleston, SC

 110

 Development
 CBTC I  UPRR  North Platte - Morrill South, NE

 193

 Development
 CBTC II  UPRR  Spokane, WA - Eastport, ID

 140

 Development
 ASES I  NJ TRANSIT  Spring Valley, NY - Woodridge, NJ

 21

 Test
 ASES II  NJ TRANSIT  Port Jervis, NY - Secaucus, NJ

 60

 Test

FRA provided funding and technical supports for system development of ETMS, ITCS, CAS, and NAJPTC.  In addition, in cooperation with the industry and the AAR committees, FRA has supported the following PTC-related projects.

  • Universal Onboard Platform

  • Higher Performance Digital Radio

  • Communication Management Units

  • Software Defined Radio

  • TTCI Communication and PTC Test Beds

  • Hi-Speed Wireless Data Transmission with 802.11x Protocol

  • Employee-in-Charge Portable Terminals

  • Risk Assessment Modeling

layout image

About Us | Website Polices | Plug-ins | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Common Questions | Contact Us | Home | OIG Hotline


Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590