FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:                                        FOR RELEASE: 
Cheryl Abbot                                                    March 18, 2008
(214) 767-6970



                        CONSUMER SPENDING PATTERNS IN 
                    HOUSTON-GALVESTON-BRAZORIA, 2005-2006

    Consumer units(1) in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Texas metropolitan 
area spent an average of $56,260 per year in 2005-2006, according to results 
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Survey.  Regional 
Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that this figure was 18.6 percent 
higher than the U.S. average household expenditure of $47,421 during the same 
period.  Although local households spent more than the national average, they 
tended to allocate their dollars similarly among the major categories, 
differing significantly in only 6 of the 14 categories. (See table 1).  
Transportation accounted for a significantly larger(2) portion of average 
expenditures in the Houston area compared to the United States, whereas 
spending on housing, food, and entertainment represented significantly 
smaller-than-average shares of local expenditures.  (See Chart A.)


Chart A.  Percent distribution of total average expenditures for selected 
categories, United States and Houston metropolitan area, Consumer Expenditure 
Survey, 2005-2006

Percent distribution of total average expenditures for selected categories,
United States and Houston metropolitan area, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006



     This report contains annual data averaged over a two-year period, 2005 
and 2006.  The data are from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE), which is 
collected on an ongoing basis by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics (BLS).  The Consumer Expenditure Survey is the only national 
survey that provides both complete data on household expenditures and the 
demographic characteristics of those households.  CE data are available for 
the nation, the 4 geographic regions of the country, and 18 metropolitan 
areas.  Survey data cannot be used to make cost of living comparisons between 
areas.  Expenditures vary among areas not only because of economic factors 
such as the prices of goods and services and family income, but also because 
of differences such as the age of the population, climate, consumer tastes, 
family size, etc.  However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a 
consumer unit’s budget spent on a particular category, can be used to compare 
spending patterns across areas.  The survey provides average expenditures for 
consumer units.  An individual consumer unit may spend more or less than the 
average, depending on its particular characteristics.

     Though data for 18 metropolitan areas were available for the 2005-06 
period, 3 in particular—Dallas, Miami, and Atlanta—were selected for 
comparison with Houston, as they are all located in the South and had 
populations that were similar in size.

     Housing, the largest expenditure category, accounted for 30.6 percent of 
a Houston area household’s total budget; this share was significantly lower 
than the 33.3-percent national average.  (See table 1.)  Miami (37.6 percent) 
and Atlanta (37.0 percent) had housing shares that were measurably above the 
U.S. average, while the share in Dallas (33.5 percent) was not significantly 
different.  (See chart 1.)

     The rate of homeownership in Houston, 70 percent, was higher than the 
national average of 67 percent.  Atlanta (69 percent) also had a higher 
homeownership rate than the national average, while Dallas (65 percent) and 
Miami (63 percent) were lower.  The majority of Houston housing expenditures 
went toward shelter costs (54.8 percent), which include mortgage interest, 
property taxes, repairs, and rent, among other items.  The Houston share was 
significantly lower than the 58.6-percent spent nationally.  (See table A.)  
Similarly, household furnishings and equipment accounted for a smaller share 
of local housing expenditures (9.8 percent) than in the U.S. (11.0 percent).  
In contrast, expenses for utilities, fuels, and public services accounted for 
24.3 percent of total housing expenditures in the Houston metropolitan area, 
significantly more than the 20.9-percent national share.  (See table 2 for 
detailed expenditure levels.)


Table A. Percent distribution of housing expenditures, United States and selected
metropolitan areas, 2005-2006
===================================================================================
                                        United                     
            Category                    States  Houston  Atlanta   Dallas    Miami
===================================================================================
Total housing                            100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0 
  Shelter                                 58.6     54.8     59.0     55.4     63.1 
  Utilities, fuels, and public services   20.9     24.3     23.4     24.8     21.5 
  Household operations                     5.5      6.9      6.1      6.4      5.4 
  Housekeeping supplies                    4.0      4.3      3.4      4.0      3.3 
  Household furnishings and equipment     11.0      9.8      8.1      9.5      6.7 
===================================================================================
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.


     Transportation, the second-largest expenditure category in the Houston 
area at 20.7 percent of total expenditures, was significantly higher than the 
17.8-percent national average.  In fact, Houston was the only area with an 
above-average transportation share among the 18 published metropolitan areas 
nationwide.  Households in Miami (19.3 percent), Dallas (18.1 percent), and 
Atlanta (17.4 percent) allocated shares for transportation that were not 
significantly different from the nation.  Six other areas located throughout 
the country had lower-than-average transportation expenditure shares.  (See 
chart 2.)

     Of the annual $11,636 transportation expenditure in the Houston area, 
95.5 percent was used in buying and maintaining private vehicles; this 
compared to a national average of 94.4 percent.  (See table B for expenditure 
shares and table 2 for detailed expenditure levels.)  The average number of 
vehicles per household in Houston was 1.9, which equaled the national 
average.  The average number of vehicles per household was close to the U.S. 
average in Dallas (2.0), but lower in Atlanta (1.6) and Miami (1.5).  In the 
Houston area, 4.5 percent of the household transportation budget was spent on 
public transit, which includes fares for taxis, buses, trains, and planes; 
nationally, the average was 5.6 percent.


Table B. Percent distribution of transportation expenditures, United States
and selected metropolitan areas, 2005-2006
==============================================================================
                                   United                     
            Category               States  Houston  Atlanta   Dallas    Miami
==============================================================================
Total transportation                100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0 
  Vehicle purchases (net outlays)    41.3     45.6     41.4     40.6     39.1 
  Gasoline and motor oil             25.2     23.6     28.0     24.9     25.3 
  Other vehicle expenses             27.9     26.4     25.9     29.1     30.3 
  Public transportation               5.6      4.5      4.8      5.4      5.3 
==============================================================================
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.


     Payments for personal insurance and pensions averaged $6,478 and 
accounted for 11.5 percent of the local household budget, close to the 11.0-
percent share allocated nationally.  Atlanta (12.8 percent) and Dallas (12.3 
percent) had an above-average share for these types of payments, while 
consumer units in Miami (9.4 percent) allocated a significantly smaller share 
of their budget to personal insurance and pensions.

     The portion of a Houston household’s budget spent on food, 10.8 percent, 
was significantly lower than the 12.7-percent share recorded nationally.  
While consumer units in Miami (13.3 percent) allocated a larger share of 
their annual budget to food, households in Dallas (12.3 percent) and Atlanta 
(12.1 percent) spent less than the U.S. average.

     Consumer units in Houston spent $3,231, or 53.3 percent, of their food 
dollars on food prepared at home, significantly below the U.S. household 
share of 55.7 percent.  The remaining 46.7 percent of local food budgets was 
spent on food prepared away from home, such as restaurant meals, carry-outs, 
board at school, and catered meals.  Compared to the national average, 
Atlanta households also allocated a measurably smaller share to costs for 
eating at home (47.4 percent), while Miami (63.7 percent) spent a 
significantly higher share on food at home.  The share in Dallas (54.7 
percent) was not significantly different from the national average.

     Out-of-pocket healthcare expenses -- which include health insurance 
premiums, medical services, drugs (prescription and nonprescription), and 
medical care supplies -- accounted for 5.8 percent of total household 
expenditures in both Houston and Dallas, not significantly different from the 
5.7-percent share recorded nationwide.  However, the percentage spent on out-
of-pocket health care expenses was significantly less than the national 
average in both Miami (5.2 percent) and Atlanta (4.6 percent).

     Cash contributions accounted for 4.9 percent of an average consumer 
unit’s spending in Houston, not significantly different from the national 
average of 3.7 percent.  This category consists of cash contributed to 
persons or organizations outside the consumer unit, including alimony and 
child support payments; care of students away from home; and contributions to 
religious, educational, charitable, or political organizations.  Expenditures 
for cash contributions were below the U.S. average in Miami (3.1 percent) and 
Atlanta (2.8 percent), but not significantly different in Dallas (3.9 
percent).

     Spending on apparel and services accounted for 4.6 percent of total 
expenditures in Houston, not significantly different from the 4.0-percent 
national average.  Households in Atlanta (4.2 percent) and Dallas (3.8 
percent) allocated a similar share of their total budgets for clothing when 
compared to the typical U.S. household, while the expenditure share in Miami 
(2.9 percent) was significantly lower than the nation.

     Houston area households allocated a significantly lower share (4.5 
percent) of their budgets to entertainment expenditures when compared to the 
national average (5.0 percent).  Consumer units in Dallas (4.3 percent) and 
Miami (3.6 percent) also spent lower portions of their total budgets on 
entertainment, while the share in Atlanta was not significantly different 
from the U.S. average.

     As noted, Houston is 1 of 18 areas nationwide for which Consumer 
Expenditure data are available.  Users interested in learning more about the 
Consumer Expenditure Survey may contact the Southwest Information Office at 
(214) 767-6970.  Metropolitan area CE data and that for the four geographic 
regions and the United States are available on the BLS Web site at 
http://www.bls.gov/cex/.  This release is available in text and PDF 
format on the Dallas BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/ro6/.


                                  Technical Note

     The current Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program began in 1980.  Its 
principal objective is to collect information on the buying habits of American 
consumers.  The consumer expenditure data are used in a wide variety of 
research by government, business, labor, and academic analysts.  The data are 
also required for periodic revision of the Consumer Price Index.

     The survey consists of two components, a diary or recordkeeping survey, 
and an interview survey.  The Diary Survey, completed by participating consumer 
units for two consecutive 1-week periods, collects data on frequently-purchased 
smaller items.  The Interview Survey, in which the expenditures of consumer 
units are obtained in five interviews conducted every 3 months, collects data 
for larger-cost items and expenditures that occur on a regular basis.  The U.S. 
Census Bureau collects the survey data.

     Each component of the survey queries an independent sample of consumer 
units which is representative of the U.S. population. Over the year, about 
7,000 consumer units are sampled for the Diary Survey.  The Interview Survey is 
conducted on a rotating panel basis, with about 7,000 consumer units 
participating each quarter.  The data are collected on an ongoing basis in 91 
areas of the country.

     The integrated data from the BLS Diary and Interview Surveys provide a 
complete accounting of consumer expenditures and income, which neither survey 
component alone is designed to do.

     The expenditure data in this release should be interpreted with care. The 
expenditures are averages for consumer units with the specified 
characteristics, regardless of whether or not a specific unit incurred an 
expense for that specific item during the recording period.  The average 
expenditure may be considerably lower than the expenditure by those consumer 
units that purchased the item.  This study is not intended as a comparative 
cost of living survey, as neither the quantity nor the quality of goods and 
services has been held constant among areas.  Differences may result from 
variations in demographic characteristics such as consumer unit size, age, 
preferences, income levels, etc.  Users should keep in mind that prices for 
many goods and services have risen since the survey was conducted. 

     In addition, sample surveys are subject to two types of errors.  Sampling 
errors occur because the data are collected from a representative sample rather 
than the entire population.  Nonsampling errors result from the inability or 
unwillingness of respondents to provide correct information, differences in 
interviewer ability, mistakes in recording or coding, or other processing 
errors.  The year-to-year changes are volatile and should be interpreted 
carefully.  Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for 
the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable 
than those for the metropolitan areas. 

     Some expenditure components are subject to large fluctuations from one 
year to the next because these components include expensive items that 
relatively few consumers purchase each year.  Thus, shifts from year to year in 
the number of consumers making such purchases can have a large effect on 
average expenditures.  Examples of these types of expenses are purchases of new 
cars and trucks in the transportation component, and spending on boats and 
recreational vehicles in the entertainment component.

     The CE significance tests in this release compare expenditure shares for
the 14 major expenditure categories in the United States to expenditure shares
in selected metropolitan areas (areas in this release are listed below).
Expenditure shares that are above or below that for the nation after testing
for significance at the 95-percent confidence interval are identified in the
tables and charts of this release.

     NOTE:  A value that is statistically different from another does not 
necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance.  
Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident 
statements about a universe based on a sample.  It is entirely possible that a 
large difference between two values is not significantly different 
statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and 
heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

     Metropolitan areas definitions are based on Core-Based Statistical Areas 
defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.  The metropolitan areas 
and their component counties and cities discussed in this release are:

Atlanta, Ga. -- includes Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb,
Coweta, Dawson, De Kalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Haralson,
Henry, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties
in Georgia; and Cleburne County in Alabama

Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas -- includes Collin, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis, 
Henderson, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant and Wise 
Counties

Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Texas -- includes Austin, Brazoria, Chambers,
Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery, San Jacinto and Waller Counties 

Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla. -- includes Broward and Miami Dade Counties


                                  Definitions

     Consumer unit - members of a household related by blood, marriage, adoption,
or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household 
with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living 
together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of 
expenses - food, housing, and other expenses.  The terms household or consumer 
unit are used interchangeably for convenience.

     Expenditures - consist of the transaction costs, including excise and sales 
taxes, of goods and services acquired during the interview or recordkeeping 
period.  Expenditure estimates include expenditures for gifts, but exclude 
purchases or portions of purchases directly assignable to business purposes.  
Also excluded are periodic credit or installment payments on goods or services 
already acquired.  The full cost of each purchase is recorded even though full 
payment may not have been made at the date of purchase.

     Income before taxes - the total money earnings and selected money receipts 
during the 12 months prior to the interview date.

===================================================================================
     (1) See Technical Note for definition of a consumer unit. The terms consumer
unit and household are used interchangeably throughout this text for convenience.
     (2) Statistical significance tests were introduced for metropolitan area
expenditure shares beginning with 2004-2005 data.  See Technical Note for further
discussion of Consumer Expenditure significance testing.
===================================================================================
 


Table 1. Consumer unit characteristics and percent distribution of expenditures,
U.S. and selected metropolitan statistical areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey,
2005-2006
===============================================================================
                                    United   		     
              Item                  States  Houston  Atlanta   Dallas    Miami
===============================================================================
Consumer unit characteristics:
  Income before taxes              $59,628  $68,659  $64,217  $66,261  $51,232 
  Age of reference person             48.7     45.7     46.1     44.9     50.4 
 
Average number in consumer unit:
  Persons                              2.5      2.8      2.5      2.8      2.5 
  Children under 18                     .6       .8       .7       .8       .6 
  Persons 65 and over                   .3       .2       .2       .2       .4 
  Earners                              1.3      1.4      1.3      1.6      1.3 
  Vehicles                             1.9      1.9      1.6      2.0      1.5 
 
Percent homeowner                       67       70       69       65       63 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average annual expenditures        $47,421  $56,260  $43,727  $53,294  $42,379 
   Percent distribution:             100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0    100.0 
					
Food                                  12.7     10.8     12.1     12.3     13.3 
 
Alcoholic beverages                    1.0      1.1       .6       .9       .6 

Housing                               33.3     30.6     37.0     33.5     37.6 

Apparel and services                   4.0      4.6      4.2      3.8      2.9 

Transportation                        17.8     20.7     17.4     18.1     19.3 

Healthcare                             5.7      5.8      4.6      5.8      5.2 

Entertainment                          5.0      4.5      4.3      4.3      3.6 

Personal care products & services      1.2      1.3      1.1      1.3      1.5 

Reading                                 .3       .2       .2       .2       .1 

Education                              1.9      1.8      1.5      1.5      1.7 

Tobacco products & smoking supplies     .7       .5       .4       .5       .4 

Miscellaneous                          1.7      1.8      1.2      1.6      1.2 

Cash contributions                     3.7      4.9      2.8      3.9      3.1 

Personal insurance and pensions       11.0     11.5     12.8     12.3      9.4 
===============================================================================
NOTE: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.



Table 2.  Consumer unit characteristics and average annual expenditures,
U.S. and selected metropolitan areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006
==================================================================================
                                       United   		     
                  Item                 States  Houston  Atlanta   Dallas    Miami
==================================================================================
Consumer unit characteristics:
  Income before taxes                 $59,628  $68,659  $64,217  $66,261  $51,232 
  Age of reference person                48.7     45.7     46.1     44.9     50.4 

Average number in consumer unit:					
  Persons                                 2.5      2.8      2.5      2.8      2.5 
  Children under 18                        .6       .8       .7       .8       .6 
  Persons 65 and over                      .3       .2       .2       .2       .4 
  Earners                                 1.3      1.4      1.3      1.6      1.3 
  Vehicles                                1.9      1.9      1.6      2.0      1.5 

Percent homeowner                          67       70       69       65       63 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average annual expenditures           $47,421  $56,260  $43,727  $53,294  $42,379 

Food                                    6,022    6,063    5,289    6,537    5,637 
  Food at home                          3,357    3,231    2,506    3,573    3,593 
    Cereals and bakery products           446      382      323      468      464 
    Meats, poultry, fish, & eggs          781      784      661      805      910 
    Dairy products                        373      329      234      392      427 
    Fruits and vegetables                 572      587      443      596      727 
    Other food at home                  1,185    1,149      846    1,312    1,066 
  Food away from home                   2,665    2,832    2,783    2,964    2,044 

Alcoholic beverages                       462      604      265      461      255 

Housing                                15,782   17,198   16,158   17,854   15,928 
  Shelter                               9,253    9,427    9,539    9,883   10,053 
    Owned dwellings                     6,250    6,501    6,467    6,793    6,385 
    Rented dwellings                    2,468    2,293    2,523    2,478    3,445 
    Other lodging                         535      634      549      611      222 
  Utilities, fuels, & public services   3,291    4,179    3,773    4,424    3,421 
  Household operations                    875    1,181      990    1,140      856 
  Housekeeping supplies                   625      732      548      714      532 
  Household furnishings   
            and equipment               1,737    1,679    1,307    1,693    1,065 

Apparel and services                    1,880    2,608    1,847    2,048    1,242 

Transportation                          8,427   11,636    7,599    9,662    8,186 
  Vehicle purchases (net outlay)        3,482    5,305    3,146    3,919    3,199 
  Gasoline and motor oil                2,121    2,743    2,124    2,410    2,069 
  Other vehicle expenses                2,347    3,068    1,965    2,816    2,480 
  Public transportation                   476      519      364      517      437 

Healthcare                              2,716    3,259    2,017    3,075    2,190 
Entertainment                           2,382    2,528    1,861    2,285    1,523 
Personal care products and services       563      737      460      713      633 
Reading                                   122      114       72      110       43 
Education                                 914      998      652      799      724 
Tobacco products & smoking supplies       323      274      190      260      168 
Miscellaneous                             827    1,025      522      839      524 
Cash contributions                      1,767    2,736    1,207    2,077    1,328 

Personal insurance and pensions         5,237    6,478    5,587    6,573    4,000 
  Life & other personal insurance         351      441      266      382      221 
  Pensions and Social Security          4,886    6,038    5,321    6,191    3,779 
==================================================================================



Chart 1. Expenditure shares spent on housing in all 18 metropolitan 
statistical areas compared to the U.S. average, 2005-2006

Expenditure shares spent on housing in all 18 metropolitan statistical
areas compared to the U.S. average, 2005-2006
Chart 2. Expenditure shares spent on transportation in all 18 metropolitan 
statistical areas compared to the U.S. average, 2005-2006

Expenditure shares spent on transportation in all 18 metropolitan 
statistical areas compared to the U.S. average, 2005-2006

 

Last Modified Date: March 18, 2008