NOAA

Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory

Skip to: [content] [navigation]
If you are using Navigator 4.x or Internet Explorer 4.x or Omni Web 4.x , this site will not render correctly!

Larson, V. E., A. J. Smith, M. J. Falk, K. E. Kotenberg, and J-C. Golaz, 2006: What determines altocumulus dissipation time? Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D19207, doi:10.1029/2005JD007002.
Abstract: This paper asks what factors influence the dissipation time of altocumulus clouds. The question is addressed using three-dimensional, large-eddy simulations of a thin, midlevel cloud that was observed by aircraft. The cloud might be aptly described as "altostratocumulus" because it was overcast and contained radiatively driven turbulence. The simulations are used to construct a budget equation of cloud water. This equation allows one to directly compare the four processes that diminish liquid: diffusional growth of ice crystals, large-scale subsidence, radiative heating, and turbulent mixing of dry air into the cloud. Various sensitivity studies are used to find the "equivalent sensitivity" of cloud decay time to changes in various parameters. A change from no sunlight to direct overhead sunlight decreases the lifetime of our simulated cloud as much as increasing subsidence by 1.2 cm s-1, increasing ice number concentration by 780 m-3, or decreasing above-cloud total water mixing ratio by 0.60 g kg-1. Finally, interactions among the terms in the cloud water budget are summarized in a "budget term feedback matrix." It is able to diagnose, for instance, that in our particular simulations, the diffusional growth of ice is a negative feedback.

smaller bigger reset
last modified: March 22 2007.