******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Deployment of Wireline Services Offering ) CC Docket No. 98-147 Advanced Telecommunications Capability ) ) and ) ) Implementation of the Local Competition ) CC Docket No. 96-98 Provisions of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ORDER CLARIFICATION Adopted: February 22, 2001 Released: February 23, 2001 By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On January 19, 2001, the Commission released the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order, responding to five petitions for reconsideration and/or clarification of the Commission's Line Sharing Order, which required incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) to make the high frequency portion of the loop available to competing providers of advanced services. In this Order, we clarify that the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order in no way modified the criteria set forth in the Commission's UNE Remand Order regarding the unbundling of packet switching functionality. Specifically, we clarify that the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order does not alter section 51.319(b)(5) of the Commission's rules, which describes the limited set of circumstances under which an incumbent LEC is required to provide nondiscriminatory access to unbundled packet switching capability. 2. Nonetheless, we note that in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that accompanied the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order, the Commission expressly sought comment on whether its existing packet switching rules are adequate to enable competitors to line share when there is fiber deployed in the loop. Consequently, we encourage commenters to discuss this issue in response to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to authority contained in sections 1- 4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151, 153, 154, 201-205, 251, 252, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91 and 0.291, that the Commission clarifies the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order as set out above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau