Overview
The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) chose the Duke University Center for Clinical Health Policy Research to perform formal systematic reviews of the current evidence in the five new non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) topic areas, as well as to provide a search for the existing guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in all of the topics areas. In addition, the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research) AHRQ agreed to fund the BlueCross BlueShield Association Technology Evaluation Center to perform the formal systematic review of literature on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The Health Outcomes Research Group of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center conducted a full-scale review of the literature since the first set of guidelines in the area of screening for lung cancer to assist that particular writing group.
The formal systematic reviews of the five new topic areas were guided by the appropriate chapter editors and their writing committees, in concert with the Executive Committee of the panel.
The two EPC research teams conducted a variety of systematic computerized bibliographic database searches including the following: (1) a search for systematic reviews, guidelines, and meta-analyses published since the last ACCP lung cancer guideline (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, National Guidelines Clearinghouse); (2) targeted searches for reviews in each of five selected treatment sections (solitary pulmonary nodules, stage I and II, stage IIIA, stage IIIB, stage IV); these searches, run in OVID version of MEDLINE, were performed in July and August 2005 and were limited to publication years since 1995, English language, and human subjects; and (3) searches related to SCLC are described in the evidence chapter on SCLC.
Search terms included the medical subject heading terms lung neoplasms (exploded) and bronchial neoplasms for the lung cancer concept. Each topic search utilized key words specific to the key questions of interest (complete search strategies are available on request from the authors).
Strategy Specific for Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
For this edition of the lung cancer guidelines, investigators from the Duke University Evidence-Based Practice Center and the authors of this guideline updated a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for staging in patients with non-invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The methods and results of the initial review have been published previously and a more complete description of the methodology can be found there (see the "Availability of Companion Documents" field in this summary for "Methodology for Lung Cancer Evidence Review and Guidelines Development"). Briefly, the search strategy used computerized searches of the MEDLINE bibliographic database (January 1991 to May 2006), HealthStar, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, we searched the reference lists of included studies, selected textbooks, practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses in order to ensure that all relevant studies were identified. Only articles that had been published in English were considered.