Short Contents | Full Contents Other books @ NCBI


Surgeon General Reports, SAMHSA TIPs, SAMHSA PEPs Put Prevention Into Practice (Static collection) Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services, 2nd Edition. PPIP

Children and Adolescents  ---Screening

1. Anemia

Improved nutrition has eased the problem of childhood anemia in the United States. However, certain groups of children, particularly infants and adolescent girls, remain at significant risk. Factors that place infants at high risk include low socioeconomic status, consumption of cow's milk before age 1 year, consumption of formula not fortified with iron, and low birth weight. Untreated anemia can lead to fatigue, apathy, impairment of growth and development, and decreased resistance to infection.

Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia in children and adolescents. Hemoglobinopathies, such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia, are also significant causes. See chapters 8 and 27 for information on screening for hemoglobinopathies in newborns and adults, respectively.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) --
Hemoglobin concentration screening should be performed between 6 and 12 months of age for infants in high-risk groups. The AAFP and USPSTF define high-risk groups as infants living in poverty; African Americans; American Indians; Alaska Natives; immigrants from developing countries; preterm and low-birth-weight infants; and infants whose principal intake is unfortified cow's milk.


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Hemoglobin or hematocrit should be measured once during infancy (between 1 and 9 months) for all children and once during adolescence for all menstruating teenagers. Bright Futures recommends hemoglobin and hematocrit screening at age 6 months if certification for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is needed. Bright Futures also recommends annual hemoglobin and hematocrit screening for adolescent females (ages 11 to 21 years) if any of the following risk factors are present: moderate to heavy menses, chronic weight loss, nutritional deficit, or athletic activity.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
There is conflicting and insufficient evidence to recommend for or against inclusion or exclusion of routine hemoglobin measurements at 6 to 12 months of age in normal infants. However, there is fair evidence to recommend a routine measurement for high-risk infants (infants of families of low socioeconomic status, Chinese or aboriginal ethnic origin, low birth weight [<2500 grams], or fed only whole cow's milk during the first year of life).

Basics of Anemia Screening

1. Three basic methods are used to determine hemoglobin levels and hematocrits: venipuncture with analysis by automated cell counter, capillary sampling with analysis by hemoglobinometer, or capillary sampling with microhematocrit analysis by centrifuge. ( NOTE: The microhematocrit method yields slightly higher values and is somewhat less sensitive than the automated cell counter method. The capillary methods may provide less reliable results because of greater variation in sampling technique than venipuncture.)

2. In general, do not screen for anemia in a child who has had fever or infection during the preceding 2 to 3 weeks.

3. If the capillary method is used, observe the following principles of collection:
  • In infants, the best sites are the medial and lateral aspects of the plantar surface of the heel. In older children, the best sites are the medial and lateral aspects of the pulp of a finger; make the puncture perpendicular to the skin and across the dermal ridges.
  • To increase blood flow and accuracy of the test, make sure the heel or finger is warm.
  • Before puncture, clean the site with an antiseptic and allow it to dry.
  • Use sterile, disposable lancets with tips less than 2.5 mm long for infants aged 6 months or younger. Lancets with longer tips (up to 5 mm) may be used for older children.
  • Wipe away the first two to three drops of blood, which contain tissue fluids, with a dry gauze.
  • Do not milk or squeeze the puncture site, because this may cause hemolysis and admixture of tissue fluids with the specimen.


4. Table 1.1 shows hemoglobin and hematocrit cut points for the diagnosis of anemia in children, which are derived from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) conducted from 1976 through 1980. Although NHANES II did not provide data for children younger than 1 year of age, the cut points for 6-month-old children determined by extrapolation are only a fraction of a unit less than those for 1-year-old children.


Cut points for anemia should be adjusted upward for children and adolescents who live at high altitudes or smoke (See Tables 27.1 and 27.2).
top link

Patient Resources


Sickle Cell Anemia (New Hope for People With). FDA Office of Consumer Affairs. HFE 88 Rm 1675, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20857; (800)532-4440.
top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. . Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, Il: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1993.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in infants. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 23.

Centers for Disease Control. . CDC criteria for anemia in children and childbearing-aged women. MMWR. 1989. 38: 400-404.

Dallman PR. . Has routine screening of infants for anemia become obsolete in the United States? Pediatrics. 1987. 80: 439-441. (PubMed)

Dallman PR. . New approaches to screening for iron deficiency. J Pediatr. 1977. 90: 678-681. (PubMed)

Dallman PR, Yip R, Johnson C. . Prevalence and causes of anemia in the United States, 1976 to 1980. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984. 39: 437-445. View this and related citations using

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Lozoff B, Brittenham GM, Wolf AW, et al. . Iron deficiency anemia and iron therapy effects on infant developmental test performance. Pediatrics. 1987. 79: 981-995. (PubMed)

Meites S, Levitt MJ. . Skin-puncture and blood-collecting techniques for infants. Clin Chem. 1979. 25: 183-189. (PubMed)

Randolph VS. . Considerations for the clinical laboratory serving the pediatric patient. Am J Med Technol. 1982. 48: -.

Reeves JD, Yip R, Kiley VA, Dallman PR. . Iron deficiency in infants: the influence of mild antecedent infection. J Pediatr. 1984. 105: 874-879. (PubMed)

Thomas WJ, Collins TM. . Comparison of venipuncture blood counts with microcapillary measurements in screening for anemia in one-year-old infants. J Pediatr. 1982. 101: 32-35. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for iron deficiency anemia. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 22.

Yip R, Binkin NJ, Fleshood L, Trowbridge FL. . Declining prevalence of anemia among low-income children in the United States. JAMA. 1987. 258: 1619-1623. (PubMed)

Young PC, Hamill BH, Wasserman RC, Dickerman JD. . Evaluation of the capillary microhematocrit as a screening test for anemia in pediatric office practice. Pediatrics. 1986. 78: 206-209. (PubMed)

Tables

Table 1.1. Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Cut Points for Anemia in Children 1 Year of Age or Older


Gender Age, years Hemoglobin, g/dL Hematocrit, %

Both Genders 1-1.9 11.0 33.0
2-4.9 11.2 34.0
5-7.9 11.4 34.5
8-11.9 11.6 35.0
Female 12-14.9 11.8 35.5
15-17.9 12.0 36.0
> 18 12.0 36.0
Male 12-14.9 12.3 37.0
15-17.9 12.6 38.0
> 18 13.6 41.0



From: Centers for Disease Control. CDC criteria for anemia in children and childbearing-aged women. MMWR. 1989;38:400-404.

2. Blood Pressure

Important changes have occurred in the measurement, epidemiology, and significance of childhood blood pressure since the publication of the first edition of the Clinician's Handbook. These changes were summarized in an update from The National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents (October, 1996). Current understanding of childhood blood pressure not only recognizes the importance of identification of children with hypertension due to secondary conditions but also the realization that mild elevations in blood pressure during childhood (and particularly adolescence) are more common than previously thought. Elevated blood pressure in some children may represent the early onset of essential hypertension.

Blood pressure varies throughout the day in children and adults because of normal diurnal fluctuation and other factors such as physical activity and emotional stress. Body size is the most important determinant of blood pressure in children. New tables of blood pressure percentiles (Tables 2.1 and 2.2) have been released; these tables consider height in addition to age and sex.

Hypertension is defined as average systolic or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to the 95th percentile for age, sex, and height measured on at least three separate occasions. Elevated blood pressure must be confirmed on repeated visits before characterizing an individual as having hypertension. A more precise characterization of an individual's blood pressure level is an average of multiple measurements taken over weeks to months. With repeated measurement using standardized techniques, only about 1% of children and adolescents will be diagnosed with hypertension.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Blood pressure should be measured in children at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 years of age, and annually beginning at 10 years of age.


American Medical Association --
During adolescence, blood pressure should be measured annually.


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children --
Blood pressure should be measured annually beginning at 3 years of age.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
Measurement of blood pressure during office visits is recommended for children and adolescents. Beginning age and periodicity are not specified. This recommendation is based on the proven benefits of early detection of treatable causes of secondary hypertension.
top link

Basics of Blood Pressure Screening

1. Advise patients, especially adolescents, not to smoke or otherwise use tobacco or ingest caffeine, including cola products, for at least 30 minutes before the measurement.

2. Perform the measurement in a controlled area and after 3 to 5 minutes of rest with the child in the seated position. The right arm should be fully exposed and the cubital fossa supported at heart level.

3. The mercury column sphygmomanometer is preferred over the calibrated aneroid manometer.

4. Choose an appropriately sized cuff. The bladder width should be 40% of the arm circumference measured at midpoint between the olecranon and acromion (Figure 2.1). This usually translates into a cuff that covers 80% to 100% of the circumference of the arm without impinging on the antecubital fossa (Figure 2.2). Use of a cuff that is too small will result in falsely elevated measurements. Use of a cuff that is too large will result in falsely low measurements.

5. Place the bell of the stethoscope lightly on the antecubital fossa over the brachial artery. Applying too much pressure may lead to inaccurate measurements. Rapidly inflate the cuff to approximately 20 mm Hg above the point at which the pulse is no longer audible. Then deflate the cuff at a rate of 2 to 3 mm Hg per second. The onset of a tapping sound (the first Korotkoff sound) is used to determine systolic blood pressure, and the
disappearance of Korotkoff sounds determines the diastolic blood pressure.

6. Documentation of the patient's position, limb used, and cuff size may be required for consistency of repeated blood pressure measurements.

7. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures corresponding to the 90th and 95th percentiles according to gender, age, and percentile of height are shown in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. The height percentile is determined from the standard growth charts. A child is considered normotensive if the blood pressure is below the 90th percentile. Blood pressures in the 90th through 94th percentiles are considered high normal, and those at or above the 95th percentile are considered elevated.

8. Standards for systolic and diastolic BP for infants younger than 1 year are available. In children of this age, systolic BP is used to define hypertension.

top link

Patient Resources


Eat Right to Lower Your High Blood Pressure; High Blood Pressure: Treat it for Life; Check Your Healthy Heart IQ; High Blood Pressure and What You Can Do About It; Six Good Reasons to Control Your High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Information Center, PO Box 30105, Bethesda, MD 20824-0105; (301)251-1222 (English and Spanish). Internet address: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/nhlbi/nhlbi.htm
top link

Provider Resources


The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Information Center, PO Box 30105, Bethesda, MD 20824-0105; (301)251-1222 (English and Spanish). Internet address: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/nhlbi/nhlbi.htm


Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617. (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

American Medical Association. . Rationale and recommendation: hypertension. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Il: American Medical Association; 1994: chap 8.

de Swiet M, Dillon MJ. . Hypertension in children. Br Med J. 1989. 299(6697): 469-470.

Fixler DE, Laird WP. . Validity of mass blood pressure screening in children. Pediatrics. 1983. 72: 459-463. (PubMed)

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 1994.

Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. . The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1993. US Department of Health and Human Services publication NIH 93-1088. (See also, Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154-183.)

Lauer RM, Burns TL, Clarke WR. . Assessing children's blood pressure ---considerations of age and body size:the Muscatine study. Pediatrics. 1985. 75: 1081-1090. (PubMed)

Mehta SK. . Pediatric hypertension: a challenge for pediatricians. Am J Dis Child. 1987. 141: 893-894. (PubMed)

National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. . Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1996. US Department of Health and Human Services publication NIH 96-3790.

Sinaiko AR, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ. . Prevalence of "significant" hypertension in junior high school-aged children: the Children and Adolescent Blood Pressure Program. J Pediatr. 1989. 114: 664-669.

Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. . Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children ---1987. Pediatrics. 1987. 79: 1-25.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for hypertension. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 3.

Tables

Table 2.1. Blood Pressure Levels for the 90th and 95th Percentiles of Blood Pressure for Boys Aged 1 to 17 Years by Percentiles of Height

Systolic Blood Pressure by
Percentile of Height,
mm Hg **
Diastolic Blood Pressure by
Percentile of Height,
mm Hg **
Age, y Blood
Pressure
Percentile *
5% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 95% 5% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 95%
1 90th 94 95 97 98 100 102 102 50 51 52 53 54 54 55
95th 98 99 101 102 104 106 106 55 55 56 57 58 59 59
2 90th 98 99 100 102 104 105 106 55 55 56 57 58 59 59
95th 101 102 104 106 108 109 110 59 59 60 61 62 63 63
3 90th 100 101 103 105 107 108 109 59 59 60 61 62 63 63
95th 104 105 107 109 111 112 113 63 63 64 65 66 67 67
4 90th 102 103 105 107 109 110 111 62 62 63 64 65 66 66
95th 106 107 109 111 113 114 115 66 67 67 68 69 70 71
5 90th 104 105 106 108 110 112 112 65 65 66 67 68 69 69
95th 108 109 110 112 114 115 116 69 70 70 71 72 73 74
6 90th 105 106 108 110 111 113 114 67 68 69 70 70 71 72
95th 109 110 112 114 115 117 117 72 72 73 74 75 76 76
7 90th 106 107 109 111 113 114 115 69 70 71 72 72 73 74
95th 110 111 113 115 116 118 119 74 74 75 76 77 78 78
8 90th 107 108 110 112 114 115 116 71 71 72 73 74 75 75
95th 111 112 114 116 118 119 120 75 76 76 77 78 79 80
9 90th 109 110 112 113 115 117 117 72 73 73 74 75 76 77
95th 113 114 116 117 119 121 121 76 77 78 79 80 80 81
10 90th 110 112 113 115 117 118 119 73 74 74 75 76 77 78
95th 114 115 117 119 121 122 123 77 78 79 80 80 81 82
11 90th 112 113 115 117 119 120 121 74 74 75 76 77 78 78
95th 116 117 119 121 123 124 125 78 79 79 80 81 82 83
12 90th 115 116 117 119 121 123 123 75 75 76 77 78 78 79
95th 119 120 121 123 125 126 127 79 79 80 81 82 83 83
13 90th 117 118 120 122 124 125 126 75 76 76 77 78 79 80
95th 121 122 124 126 128 129 130 79 80 81 82 83 83 84
14 90th 120 121 123 125 126 128 128 76 76 77 78 79 80 80
95th 124 125 127 128 130 132 132 80 81 81 82 83 84 85
15 90th 123 124 125 127 129 131 131 77 77 78 79 80 81 81
95th 127 128 129 131 133 134 135 81 82 83 83 84 85 86
16 90th 125 126 128 130 132 133 134 79 79 80 81 82 82 83
95th 129 130 132 134 136 137 138 83 83 84 85 86 87 87
17 90th 128 129 131 133 134 136 136 81 81 82 83 84 85 85
95th 132 133 135 136 138 140 140 85 85 86 87 88 89 89


* Blood pressure percentile was determined by a single measurement.



** Height percentile was determined by standard growth curves.



From: National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Pediatrics. 1996;98(4):649-658.
Table 2.2. Blood Pressure Levels for the 90th and 95th Percentiles of Blood Pressure for Girls Aged 1 to 17 Years by Percentiles of Height

Systolic Blood Pressure by
Percentile of Height,
mm Hg **
Diastolic Blood Pressure by
Percentile of Height,
mm Hg **
Age, y Blood
Pressure
Percentile *
5% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 95% 5% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 95%
1 90th 97 98 99 100 102 103 104 53 53 53 54 55 56 56
95th 101 102 103 104 105 107 107 57 57 57 58 59 60 60
2 90th 99 99 100 102 103 104 105 57 57 58 58 59 60 61
95th 102 103 104 105 107 108 109 61 61 62 62 63 64 65
3 90th 100 100 102 103 104 105 106 61 61 61 62 63 63 64
95th 104 104 105 107 108 109 110 65 65 65 66 67 67 68
4 90th 101 102 103 104 106 107 108 63 63 64 65 65 66 67
95th 105 106 107 108 109 111 111 67 67 68 69 69 70 71
5 90th 103 103 104 106 107 108 109 65 66 66 67 68 68 69
95th 107 107 108 110 111 112 113 69 70 70 71 72 72 73
6 90th 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 67 67 68 69 69 70 71
95th 108 109 110 111 112 114 114 71 71 72 73 73 74 75
7 90th 106 107 108 109 110 112 112 69 69 69 70 71 72 72
95th 110 110 112 113 114 115 116 73 73 73 74 75 76 76
8 90th 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 70 70 71 71 72 73 74
95th 112 112 113 115 116 117 118 74 74 75 75 76 77 78
9 90th 110 110 112 113 114 115 116 71 72 72 73 74 74 75
95th 114 114 115 117 118 119 120 75 76 76 77 78 78 79
10 90th 112 112 114 115 116 117 118 73 73 73 74 75 76 76
95th 116 116 117 119 120 121 122 77 77 77 78 79 80 80
11 90th 114 114 116 117 118 119 120 74 74 75 75 76 77 77
95th 118 118 119 121 122 123 124 78 78 79 79 80 81 81
12 90th 116 116 118 119 120 121 122 75 75 76 76 77 78 78
95th 120 120 121 123 124 125 126 79 79 80 80 81 82 82
13 90th 118 118 119 121 122 123 124 76 76 77 78 78 79 80
95th 121 122 123 125 126 127 128 80 80 81 82 82 83 84
14 90th 119 120 121 122 124 125 126 77 77 78 79 79 80 81
95th 123 124 125 126 128 129 130 81 81 82 83 83 84 85
15 90th 121 121 122 124 125 126 127 78 78 79 79 80 81 82
95th 124 125 126 128 129 130 131 82 82 83 83 84 85 86
16 90th 122 122 123 125 126 127 128 79 79 79 80 81 82 82
95th 125 126 127 128 130 131 132 83 83 83 84 85 86 86
17 90th 122 123 124 125 126 128 128 79 79 79 80 81 82 82
95th 126 126 127 129 130 131 132 83 83 83 84 85 86 86


* Blood pressure percentile was determined by a single measurement.



** Height percentile was determined by standard growth curves.



From: National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Pediatrics. 1996;98(4):649-658.
Figures

Figure 2.1 Determination of proper cuff size: step 1.

The cuff bladder width should be approximately 40% of the circumference of the arm measured at a point midway between the olecranon and acromion.
top link



From: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Update on the Task Force Report (1987) on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a Working Group Report From the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIH Publication No. 96-3790.top link

Figure 2.2 Determination of proper cuff size: step 2.

The cuff bladder should cover 80% to 100% of the circumference of the arm.
top link



From: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Update on the Task Force Report (1987) on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a Working Group Report From the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIH Publication No. 96-3790.top link

3. Body Measurement

Body measurement of infants and children helps clinicians recognize significant childhood problems, including growth retardation, malnutrition, obesity, and developmental abnormalities. Measurement of head circumference can identify abnormal brain development in infants, including hydrocephalus. In older children and adolescents, body measurement can identify those who are overweight and those with possible eating disorders. Both of these conditions are targets for screening in this population. The prevalence of overweight in children is increasing and has been associated with development of heart disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adulthood.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Family Physicians and US Preventive Services Task Force --
Measure height and weight periodically.


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Height, weight, and head circumference should be measured at birth, at 2 to 4 weeks, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months of age. Height and weight should also be measured at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 years of age, and annually beginning at 10 years of age. Bright Futures also recommends scoliosis and sexual maturity ratings as part of a complete physical exam for adolescents (ages 10 to 21).


American Medical Association --
All adolescents should be screened annually for eating disorders and obesity by measuring weight and stature and by asking about body image and dieting patterns.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
There is fair evidence for the inclusion of serial measurements of height, weight, and head circumference in the periodic health examination of infants and children.
top link

Basics of Body Measurement

1. To ensure accurate measurements of infants and young children, use an assistant, and if necessary, take measurements more than once, particularly when children are very young or uncooperative.

2. Determine the height of children younger than 2 years of age by measuring their length while they are recumbent. Use a measuring board with a stationary headboard and a sliding vertical foot piece, if one is available. Otherwise, use a horizontal surface, a stationary vertical surface, a movable vertical-surfaced object, and a measuring tape. The general principles for taking the measurement are the same, regardless of the apparatus used:
  • Have the child lie flat on his/her back along the center of the board or examining table with all parts of the body touching the board
  • Position the child's head against the headboard, with eyes looking upward
  • Fully extend the hips and knees
  • Move the foot piece until it rests firmly against the child's heels with feet flat
  • Record measurements to the nearest l/8 inch (0.3 cm)


3. Obtain the standing height of children beginning at 2 years of age. Use of a stadiometer, an instrument specifically designed for height measurements, is preferred. However, accurate measurements may be obtained by using a graduated ruler or tape attached to a wall and placing a flat-surfaced object horizontally on top of the child's head. Height-measuring rods that are attached to weight scales tend to become inaccurate with use; in general, do not use them unless they are checked frequently for accuracy. The general principles for taking the measurement are as follows:
  • Have the child remove his/her shoes before being measured
  • Have the child stand with the head, shoulder blades, buttocks, and heels touching the wall
  • Make sure the knees are straight and the feet are flat on the floor
  • Ask the child to look straight ahead
  • Lower the flat-surfaced object (or movable headboard) until it touches the crown of the child's head, compressing the hair


4. Use a balance-beam or electronic scale to weigh infants and children. Spring-type scales are not sufficiently accurate for this use. Check the scale before each use to ensure that it is zeroed. The infant or child should wear only a dry diaper or light undergarment while being weighed. Check scales regularly for accuracy, and make an effort to use the same scale on subsequent visits.

5. Measure a child's head circumference by extending a nonstretchable measuring tape (disposable paper tapes are better than cloth) around the most prominent part of the occiput to the middle of the forehead. Tighten the tape to compress the hair.

6. Plot measurements on age- and gender-specific National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth charts for comparison with NCHS reference values. Recording serial measurements over time provides an accurate record of growth; large or sustained deviations signal a potential problem. Interpret measurements within the context of the individual child's family and growth history. If a child's measurements fall within the 10th through 25th percentile range or the 75th through 90th percentile range, assess past growth patterns and genetic and environmental factors to determine if follow-up is necessary. Recheck measurements that are below the 5th percentile or above the 95th percentile. If these measurements are confirmed, further medical evaluations may be needed.


NOTE: Disagreement exists about the validity of using a single set of reference standards for all subpopulations of children in the United States. Although measurements should be assessed within the context of genetic and environmental factors, most authorities support use of the NCHS reference standards. Exceptions include children with genetic conditions such as Down's, Turner's, Marfan's, and fragile X syndromes, achondroplasia, sickle cell disease, and neurofibromatosis. Separate growth charts have been developed for some of these conditions. Growth charts also have been developed for use with infants born prematurely (See Selected References).

7. Some authorities, including the American Medical Association, recommend using body mass index (BMI) calculation to assess the weight of adolescents. ( See chapter 29 for information about the calculation and use of BMI.) However, because of the lack of standardized recommended values to assess BMI in adolescents, growth charts are the preferred method for assessing their weight.

top link

Patient Resources


Health Diary: Myself, My Baby. This booklet contains information about pregnancy and early childhood development. To order, contact the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325.


The Child Health Record. This material includes growth charts and other record forms. Rx for Good Health Growth Chart. This 8-1/2" x 33" poster contains information on growth for children from birth to 10 years of age. Your Child's Growth: Developmental Milestones. Presents guidelines to gauge normal stages of development in children 3 months to 6 years of age. To order, contact the American Academy of Pediatrics, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927; (800)433-9016. Internet address: http://www.aap.org


Your Growing Baby. This pamphlet includes information on growth. To order, contact Ross Laboratories, Dept L-1120, Columbus, OH 43260; (800)227-5767.
top link

Provider Resources

Growth Charts: Mead Johnson Nutritional Division. For the name and telephone number of an area representative, call: (812)429-5000.

Growth Charts: Ross Laboratories, Dept L-1120, Columbus, OH 43260; (800)227-5767.


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Medical Association. . Rationale and recommendation: dietary habits, eating disorders, and obesity. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994: chap 5.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

Babson SG, Benda GI. . Growth graphs for the clinical assessment of infants of varying gestational age. JPediatr. 1976. 89: 814-820.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening for childhood obesity. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 30.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Well baby care in the first 2 years of life. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 24.

Casey PH, Kraemer HC, Bernbaum J, et al. . Growth patterns of low birth weight preterm infants:an analysis of alarge, varied sample. J Pediatr. 1990. 117: 289-307.

Chinn S, Price CE, Rona RJ. . Need for new reference curves for height. Arch Dis Child. 1989. 64: 1545-1553. (PubMed)

Cronk C, Crocker AC, Pueschel SM, et al. . Growth charts for children with Down syndrome:1 month to 18 years of age. Pediatrics. 1988. 81: 102-110. (PubMed)

Dine MS, Gartside PS, Glueck CJ, et al. . Relationship of head circumference to length in the first 400 days of life. Pediatrics. 1981. 67: 506-507. (PubMed)

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Hamill PVV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, et al. . Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979. 32: 607-629. View this and related citations using (PubMed)

Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. . Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.

Moore WM, Roche AF. . Pediatric Anthropometry. Columbus, Oh: Ross Laboratories; 1982.

Naeraa RW, Nielsen J. . Standards for growth and final height in Turner's syndrome. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1990. 79: 182-190. (PubMed)

Nutritional Screening of Children: A Manual for Screening and Followup. . Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Health Services Administration, Bureau of Community Health Services,Office of Maternal and Child Health; 1981. US Department of Health and Human Services publication HSA 81-5114.

National Center for Health Statistics Growth Charts. . Monthly Vital Statistics Report. Hyattsville, Md: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976;25:1-22. USHEW publication HRA 76-1120.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for obesity. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 21.

Vaughan VC. . On the utility of growth curves. JAMA. 1992. 267: 975-976. (PubMed)

Yip R, Scanlon K, Trowbridge F. . Improving the growth status of Asian refugee children in the United States. JAMA. 1992. 267: 937-940. (PubMed)

4. Cholesterol

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the major cause of death in the United States. The atherosclerotic process that leads to CHD often begins in childhood. Because unfavorable lipoprotein levels are linked to early atherosclerotic changes in children, and because children with high cholesterol levels are at increased risk of having high cholesterol levels as adults, identifying such children and intervening to decrease their cholesterol levels have been suggested as a means of preventing CHD in adulthood.

Children from higher risk families (with a pattern of hypercholesterolemia or premature CHD in the adult members) who have elevated serum cholesterol levels appear to be at a particularly increased risk for CHD when they reach adulthood. This association is the basis for some of the recommendations made by major authorities for the selective screening of children for elevated cholesterol. For the general pediatric population over age 2 years, counseling to encourage a reduced intake of dietary fat, especially saturated fats, is recommended.

Children identified with high cholesterol levels may be considered for dietary or drug interventions to lower their cholesterol level. In the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC), diet produced a significant reduction in cholesterol levels without adverse effects on growth and development, but the effects of drug treatment over periods of 40 years or more have not been established.

See chapter 20 for information on nutrition counseling in children/adolescents.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine cholesterol screening of children and adolescents. Individual clinical judgment should be exercised to determine the need for screening.


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents; American Academy of Pediatrics; Bright Futures; and American Medical Association --
Universal screening of children and adolescents for cholesterol levels is not recommended. Children older than 2 years of age who have a parent with a total cholesterol level of 240 mg/dL or greater should be screened for both total serum cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels. Children (older than age 2 years) and adolescents with a family history of premature cardiovascular disease (ie, a parent or grandparent who, at age 55 years or younger, had a documented myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, or sudden cardiac death, or underwent diagnostic coronary arteriography and was found to have atherosclerosis, or underwent coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty) should be screened for lipoprotein levels after a 12-hour fast. In children whose family history is not obtainable, screening may be indicated, especially if risk factors for coronary artery disease are present (eg, high blood pressure, smoking, overweight, or excessive consumption of saturated fat and cholesterol).


US Preventive Services Task Force --
There is insufficient evidence to recommend screening of children and adolescents. For adolescents who have a family history of very high cholesterol, premature CHD in a first-degree relative (before age 50 years in men or age 60 years in women), or major nonlipid risk factors for CHD (eg, smoking, hypertension, diabetes), screening may be recommended on other grounds, because of the greater absolute risk attributable to high cholesterol levels in such persons and the potential long-term benefits of early lifestyle interventions in young persons with high cholesterol levels. Recommendations against screening of children may be made on other grounds, including the costs and inconvenience of screening and follow-up, greater potential for adverse effects of treatment, and the uncertain long-term benefits of small reductions in childhood cholesterol levels.
top link

Basics of Cholesterol Screening

1. Children may eat a normal diet before total cholesterol screening. Children undergoing lipoprotein analysis should fast, ingesting nothing but water for 12 hours before the blood sample is taken.

2. Do not screen children who are acutely ill, including those with infectious diseases. Do not screen pregnant adolescents.

3. A venous sample obtained with the patient in the sitting position yields the most accurate results; recumbency lowers lipid levels. Documentation of position is important when comparing follow-up measurements.

4. Take into account the cholesterol-raising effect of certain medications, including corticosteroids, isotretinoin, thiazides, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, and certain anabolic steroids. If a patient meeting screening criteria takes one of these drugs, a potential strategy is to perform the test, and if the result is elevated, consider the magnitude of the elevation and the ease and safety of suspending medication for retesting in the absence of drugs.

5. The laboratory used for analysis should participate in a program of external standardization to ensure compliance with standards of precision and accuracy. The National Cholesterol Education Program's Laboratory Standardization Panel recommends that bias not exceed ±5% from the true value and that the intralaboratory coefficient of variation not exceed ±5%.

6. The National Cholesterol Education Program has recommended protocols for assessing cholesterol levels in the screening of children (Figures 4.1 and 4.2).

top link

Patient Resources


Step by Step: Eating to Lower Your High Blood Cholesterol; So You Have High Blood Cholesterol; Parents Guide: Cholesterol in Children -- Healthy Eating is a Family Affair. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Information Center, PO Box 30105, Bethesda, MD 20824-0105; (301)251-1222 (English and Spanish). Internet address: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/nhlbi/nhlbi.htm


Growing up Healthy: Fat, Cholesterol, and More. This brochure provides health and eating guidelines for children 2 to 6 years old. American Academy of Pediatrics, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927; (800)433-9016.
top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Pediatrics. . Prudent life-style for children: dietary fat and cholesterol. Pediatrics. 1986. 78: 521-525. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics. . Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1993.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. . Statement on cholesterol. Pediatrics. 1992. 90: 469-473. (PubMed)

American Medical Association. . Rationale and recommendation: hyperlipidemia. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Il: American Medical Association; 1994: chap 9.

Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA, Bao W, Berenson GS. . Usefulness of childhood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in predicting adult dyslipidemia and other cardiovascular risks. Arch Intern Med. 1996. 156: 1315-20. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Lowering the blood total cholesterol level to prevent coronary heart disease. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 54.

The Dietary Intervention Study In Children Collaborative Research Group. . Efficacy and safety of lowering dietary intake of fat and cholesterol in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. JAMA. 1995. 273: 1429-35. (PubMed)

Diller PM, Huster GA, Leach AD, Laskamziski PM, Sprecher DL. . Definition and application of the discretionary screening indicators according to the National Cholesterol Education Program for children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 1995. 426: 345-52.

Garcia RE, Moodie DS. . Routine cholesterol surveillance in childhood. Pediatrics. 1989. 84: 751-755. (PubMed)

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Kuehl KS. . Cholesterol screening in childhood. Targeted versus universal approaches. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991. 623: 193-199. (PubMed)

National Cholesterol Education Program. . Recommendations for Improving Cholesterol Measurement. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1990. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service publication NIH 90-2964.

National Cholesterol Education Program, Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. . Report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1991. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service publication NIH 91-2732.

Newman WP, Wattigney W, Berenson G. . Autopsy studies in United States children and adolescents. Relationship of risk factors to atherosclerotic lesions. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991. 623: 17-25.

Newman TB, Browner W, Hulley SB. . The case against childhood cholesterol screening. JAMA. 1990. 264: 3039-3043. (PubMed)

Resnicow K, Berenson G, Shea S, Srinivasan S, et al. . The case against the "case against childhood cholesterol screening." JAMA. 1991. 265: 3003-3005. (PubMed)

Resnicow K, Morley-Kotchen J, Wynder E. . Plasma cholesterol levels of 6585 children in the United States; results of the know your body screening in five states. Pediatrics. 1989. 84: 969-976. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for blood cholesterol. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 2.

Figures

Figure 4.1 Assessment and Follow-up of Total Cholesterol Measurements

top link



From: National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1991. US Department of Health and Human Services publication NIH 91-2732.top link

Figure 4.2 Assessment and Follow-up of Lipoprotein Analysis

top link



From: National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1991. US Department of Health and Human Services publication NIH 91-2732.top link

5. Depression and Suicide

Depression in children and adolescents is a significant health problem in the United States and is often overlooked or misdiagnosed in the primary care setting. The incidence of major depressive disorders in children is approximately 2% to 4% and increases two- to threefold during adolescence.

A family history of depression, particularly parental, is a major risk factor for childhood depression, but no other specific risk factors have been consistently identified. The following factors may be associated with a variety of adverse mental health outcomes in children, including depression: a history of verbal, physical, or sexual abuse; frequent separation from or loss of a loved one; attention deficit disorder; hyperactivity; chronic illness; poverty; and mental retardation. Complications of depression in childhood and adolescence include poor school performance, poor peer relations, alcohol and drug use, promiscuity, teenage pregnancy, other psychiatric illness, and suicide.

Suicide is the third leading cause of death among persons aged 15 to 24 years, following unintentional injuries and homicide. The rate of suicide among young males is five times that among young females. Firearms are the most common method of suicide for young males and females. Among young females, attempted suicide is reported more frequently than is completed suicide, although no national data are available.

Risk factors for suicide frequently occur in combination. The strongest risk factors for both attempted and completed suicide by children and adolescents are mental disorders, especially clinical depression and conduct problems, and substance abuse. Other risk factors include a family history of mental or addictive disorders or suicide, family violence, previous suicide attempts, and availability and accessibility of firearms in the home. Acute adverse life events such as incarceration or the breakup of a relationship, in association with an underlying psychiatric disorder or other risk factors, and the presence of a firearm in the home can be a potentially dangerous combination leading to suicide.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Behavioral assessment should be a routine part of health supervision throughout childhood and adolescence. Adolescents and their parents should be asked about suicidal thoughts or threats.


American Medical Association --
Because of the pervasive nature of mood disorders, all adolescents should be screened annually for signs and symptoms of recurrent or severe depression. Special attention should be directed at adolescents who are performing poorly in school, who use alcohol or drugs, or who have had a deteriorating relationship with parents and peers. Physicians should also screen adolescents annually to identify those at risk for suicide. Parents or other adult care-givers of adolescents with suicidal intent should be counseled to remove weapons and potentially lethal medications from the home.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
Routine screening for depression is not recommended, but physicians should maintain a high level of clinical sensitivity. Evaluation of suicide risk is recommended for persons at high risk: those with a history of psychiatric illness, depression, or drug and alcohol abuse, especially those living in isolation; those with chronic terminal illness; Native and Aboriginal people, especially young males; those with a family history of suicide; and first-generation immigrant women.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against performance of routine screening tests for depression in asymptomatic patients in the primary care setting. Clinicians should, however, maintain an especially high index of suspicion for depressive symptoms in adolescents and young adults, persons with a family or personal history of depression, those with chronic illness, those who perceive or have experienced a recent loss, and those with sleep disorders, chronic pain, or multiple unexplained somatic complaints. There is also insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening by primary care clinicians to detect suicide risk in asymptomatic persons. Clinicians should be alert to evidence of suicidal ideation when the history reveals risk factors for suicide, such as depression, alcohol or other drug abuse, other psychiatric disorders, prior attempted suicide, recent divorce, separation, unemployment, and recent bereavement.
top link

Basics of Screening for Depression and Suicide

Depression

1. Become familiar with the risk factors for and symptoms of depression (See Recommendations of Major Authorities and Table 5.1).

2. Identify any risk factors or symptoms indicating the need for in-depth evaluation by a mental health professional.

top link

Suicide

1. Become familiar with the risk factors for suicide (See Recommendations of Major Authorities).

2. Inquire about suicidal thoughts in a direct, straightforward manner.

3. Question those with suicidal thoughts about the extent and specificity of plans for suicide. Immediate referral to a mental health professional is advisable, especially for individuals with serious intent.

4. Counsel parents about the importance of restricting the access of children and adolescents to dangerous prescription drugs and firearms in the home.

top link

Patient Resources


Facts for Families: The Depressed Child; Teen Suicide; Children and Grief; Manic Depressive Illness in Teens. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3615 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20016-3007; (202)966-7300; E-mail: 74003.264@compuserve.com


Surviving: Coping with Adolescent Depression and Suicide; Caring for Your Adolescent: Age 12 to 21; Divorce and Children. American Academy of Pediatrics, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60000-0927; (800)443-9016. Internet address: http://www.aap.org
top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org


The Classification of Child and Adolescent Mental Diagnosis in Primary Care. American Academy of Pediatrics, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927; (800)433-9016. Internet address: http://www.aap.org


Prevention in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; Prevention of Mental Disorders, Alcohol and Other Drug Use in Children and Adolescents. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3615 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20016-3007; (202)966-7300; E-mail 74003.264@compuserve.com


National Institute of Mental Health, 5600 Fishers Ln, Room 14C-02, Rockville, MD 20857; (800)421-4211. Internet address: http://www.nimh.nih.gov


National Mental Health Association, 1021 Prince St, Alexandria, VA 22314; (800)969-6642.
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence. . Suicide and suicide attempts in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics. 1988. 81: 322-324. (PubMed)

Angold A, Costello EJ. . The epidemiology of depression in children and adolescents. In: Goodyer IM, ed. The Depressed Child and Adolescent: Developmental and Clinical Perspectives. Cambridge Ma: Cambridge University Press; 1995:127-147.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. . Guidelines for Health Supervision. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1988.

American Medical Association. . Rationale and recommendation: depression (severe and recurrent) and suicide. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Il: American Medical Association; 1994: chap 12.

American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. . Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

Brent DA, Perper JA, Goldstein CE, et al. . Risk factors for adolescent suicide. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988. 45: 581-587. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Early detection of depression. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 39.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Prevention of suicide. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 40.

Chang G, Warner V, Weissman MM. . Physicians' recognition of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. Am J Dis Child. 1988. 142: 736-739. (PubMed)

Costello EJ, Angold A. . Scales to assess child and adolescent depression: checklists, screens, and nets. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988. 27: 726-737. (PubMed)

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Grayson P, Carlson G. . The utility of a DSM-III-R-based checklist in screening child psychiatric patients. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991. 30: 669-673. (PubMed)

Kashani J, Sherman D. . Childhood depression: epidemiology, etiological models, and treatment implications. Integr Psychiatry. 1988. 6: 1-21.

Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR. . Adolescent suicidal ideation and attempts: Prevalence, risk factors, clinical implications. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 1996. 3: 25-46.

Moscicki EK. . Epidemiology of suicidal behavior. Suicide and life-threatening behavior: Suicide Prevention: Toward the year 2000 (Special Issue). 1995. 25: 22-35.

Roberts N, Vargo B, Ferguson HB. . Measurement of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1989. 12: 837-860. (PubMed)

Slap G, Vorters D, Khalid N, Margulies S, Forke C. . Adolescent suicide attempters: do physicians recognize them? J Adolesc Health. 1992. 13: 286-292. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for depression. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1996: chap 49.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for suicide risk. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1996: chap 50.

Tables

Table 5.1. Symptoms of Major Depression


Depressed mood (or irritable mood in children and adolescents)
Markedly diminished interest or pleasure in activities
Significant weight loss or gain when not dieting, or decrease/increase in appetite (in children, consider failure to make expected weight gains), insomnia or hypersomnia
Psychomotor agitation or retardation
Fatigue or loss of energy, indecisiveness
Feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt
Diminished ability to think or concentrate, problems at school
Recurrent thoughts of death, recurrent suicidal ideation



Adapted from: American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987. Reproduced by permission of the publisher; copyright © 1987.

6. Hearing

An estimated 1% to 2% of infants and children in the United States suffer from hearing impairment. Approximately half of these cases are congenital or are acquired during infancy. Severe or profound hearing loss affects one of every 750 live births. Approximately 5% of infants in neonatal intensive care units have evidence of significant hearing loss. Some 8 million school-aged children experience temporary hearing loss, which usually occurs as a complication of otitis media with middle ear effusion.

Hearing is necessary for normal development of speech and language and is also important for acquiring psychosocial skills during infancy and childhood. Because most speech and language development occurs between birth and 3 years of age, early detection of hearing impairment in infants and children and initiation of medical and educational interventions are critical.

Refer to chapter 35 for information on hearing screening in adults.

Recommendations of Major Authorities

Normal-Risk Children


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures
endorse the recommendation by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing and alsorecommend that pure-tone audiometry be performed at 3, 4, 5, 10, 12, 15, and 18 years of age. Subjective assessment of hearing should be performed at other ages.


American Speech-Language-Hearing Association --
Annual pure-tone audiometry should be performed for children functioning at a developmental level of age 3 years to grade 3 and for any high-risk children, including those above grade 3.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
Repeated examination of hearing is recommended for young children, especially during the first year of life. Suggested guidelines for this examination include checking the startle or turning response to a novel noise produced outside the infant's field of vision at birth and 6 months of age and checking for the absence of babbling at 6 months of age. Screening using auditory brainstem responses or evoked otoacoustic emission by 3 months of age is not recommended pending further evaluation. Routine hearing assessment of asymptomatic preschoolers using history-taking, audiometry, tympanometry, or acoustic reflexometry is not recommended.


Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (American Speech-Language Hearing Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics and the Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies) and Bright Futures --
endorse the goal of universal detection of infants with hearing loss as early as possible using auditory brainstem response or otoacoustic emissions. All infants should be screened before 3 months of age.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening of asymptomatic neonates for congenital hearing loss using evoked otoacoustic emission (EOE) testing or auditory brainstem response (ABR). Routine hearing screening of asymptomatic children beyond age 3 years is not recommended. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routinely screening asymptomatic adolescents for hearing impairment. However, screening of workers for noise-induced hearing loss should be performed in the context of existing worksite programs and occupational medicine guidelines.
top link

High-Risk Children


American Academy of Pediatrics and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) --
Children with frequently recurring otitis media or middle ear effusion, or both, should have audiology screening and monitoring of communication skills development. ASHA recommends annual pure-tone audiometry testing for all children at high risk for hearing impairment.


Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (American Speech-Language Hearing Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics and the Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies) --
Neonates (birth to 28 days of age) with one or more of the neonatal risk criteria should have audiology screening, preferably before hospital discharge but no later than 3 months of age.

Neonatal Risk Criteria:

Family history of hereditary sensorineural hearing loss; in utero infection (eg, cytomegalovirus, rubella, syphilis, herpes, or toxoplasmosis); craniofacial anomalies, including those with morphological abnormalities of the pinna and ear canal; birth weight less than 1500 grams (3.3 lbs); hyperbilirubinemia at a serum level requiring exchange transfusion; ototoxic medications, including but not limited to aminoglycosides, used in multiple courses or in combination with loop diuretics; bacterial meningitis; Apgar scores of 0 to 4 at 1 minute or 0 to 6 at 5 minutes; mechanical ventilation lasting 5 days or longer; and stigmata or other findings associated with a syndrome known to include a sensorineural and/or conductive hearing loss.

Infants and children less than 2 years of age with one or more of the following risk criteria should have audiology screening.top link

Risk Criteria for Ages 29 days to 2 Years:

Parent/care-giver concern regarding hearing, speech, language, and/or developmental delay; bacterial meningitis or other infections associated with sensorineural hearing loss; head trauma associated with loss of consciousness or skull fracture; stigmata or other findings associated with a syndrome known to include a sensorineural and/or conductive hearing loss; ototoxic medications, including but not limited to aminoglycosides, used in multiple courses or in combination with loop diuretics; recurrent or persistent otitis media with effusion for at least 3 months associated with hearing loss; anatomic deformities and other disorders that affect eustachian tube function; neurofibromatosis type II and neurodegenerative disorders.

Infants and children with the following risk factors for delayed-onset hearing loss require hearing evaluation every 6 months until 3 years of age.top link

Risk Factors for Delayed-Onset Hearing Loss:

Family history of hereditary childhood hearing loss; in utero infection, such as cytomegalovirus, rubella, syphilis, herpes, or toxoplasmosis; neurofibromatosis type II and neurodegenerative disorders; recurrent or persistent otitis media with effusion, anatomic deformities, and other disorders that affect eustachian tube function; neurodegenerative disorders.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
Screening for hearing impairment in high-risk infants can be recommended based on the relatively high prevalence of hearing impairment, parental anxiety, and the potential beneficial effect on language development from early treatment of infants with moderate or severe hearing loss. Refer to neonatal risk criteria listed above under Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Clinicians examining any infant or young child should remain alert for symptoms or signs of hearing impairment, including parent/care-giver concern regarding hearing, speech, language, and/or developmental delay.
top link

Basics of Hearing Screening

1. Assess the family and medical history of every child for risk factors for hearing impairment.

2. Ask parents about the auditory responsiveness and speech and language development of young children. Any parental reports of impairment should be seriously evaluated.

3. In infants, assessment of hearing by observational techniques is very imprecise. Consider referring all infants and young children with suspected hearing difficulties to an audiologist.

4. When performing physical examinations, remain alert for structural defects of the ear, head, and neck. Remain alert for abnormalities of the ear canal (inflammation, cerumen impaction, tumors, or foreign bodies) and the eardrum (perforation, retraction, or evidence of effusion).

5. Children as young as 6 months of age, depending on how cooperative they are, may be screened by pure-tone audiometry. Two screening methods are suggested as the most appropriate tools for children who are functioning at 6 months to 3 years developmental age: visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and conditioned play audiometry (CPA). For children from approximately 6 months through 2 years of age, VRA is the recognized method of choice. As children mature beyond their second birthday, CPA may be attempted. For those children who can be conditioned for VRA, screen using earphones (conventional or insert), with 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz tones at 30 dB HL. For those children who can be conditioned for play audiometry, screen using earphones (conventional or insert), with 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz tones at 20 dB HL. Hand-held audiometers are of unproven effectiveness in screening children.

After 6 months of age, any child may be screened for middle ear dysfunction using tympanometry. Perform tympanometry with a low frequency (220, 226 Hz) probe tone and a positive to negative air pressure sweep. Middle ear pressure peaks between -150 mmhos and +150 mmhos are considered normal. Patients with pressure peaks outside this range or lack of any identifiable pressure peak should be referred for otologic follow-up.

6. Repeat screening to substantiate audiometric evidence of hearing impairment. Remove and reposition the earphones and carefully repeat the instructions to the child to assure proper understanding and attention to the test. Referral to a qualified specialist (ie, audiologist, otolaryngologist) is recommended for confirmation and work-up of hearing impairment.top link

Patient Resources


Is My Baby's Hearing Normal? American Academy of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, Order Department, 1 Prince St, Alexandria, VA 22314; (703)836-4444.


Answers to Questions About Otitis Media, Hearing, and Language Development; How Does Your Child Hear and Talk?; Recognizing Communication Disorders. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 10801 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. For general information, call: (800)638-8255. To order, call: (301)897-5700, ext 218; Internet address: http://www.asha.org


Middle Ear Fluid in Young Children: Parent Guide; Ear Infection in Children. The American Academy of Pediatrics, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927; (800)433-9016. Internet address: http://www.aap.org
top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Internet address: http://www.nih.gov/nidcd

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Internet address: http://www.asha.orgtop link

Selected References

American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. . 1990 position statement. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Headand Neck Surgery Bulletin. March 1991:15-18.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics. . Managing otitis media with effusion in young children. Pediatrics. 1994. 94: 766-773. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics. . Joint Committee on Infant Hearing position statement 1982. In: Policy Reference Guide: A Comprehensive Guide to AAP Policy Statements through December 1991. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics;1991;333-334.

American Academy of Pediatrics. . Middle ear disease and language development. In: Policy Reference Guide: A Comprehensive Guide to AAP Policy Statements through December 1991. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics;1991;418.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . Guidelines for the audiologic assessment of children from birth through 36 months of age. ASHA. 1991. 33(suppl 5): 37-43.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . Audiologic screening of newborn infants who are at risk for hearing impairment. ASHA. 1989. 31(3): 89-92.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . Guidelines for identification audiometry. ASHA.1985;May:49-53. View this and related citations usingView this and related citations using

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . Guidelines for screening for hearing impairment and middle-ear disorders. ASHA. 1990. 32(suppl 2): 17-24.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . Preferred practice patterns for the professions of speech-language pathology and audiology. Rockville, MD: ASHA. In press.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. . The prevention of communication disorders tutorial. ASHA. 1991. 33(suppl 6): 15-41. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Routine preschool screening for visual and hearing problems. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 27.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Well-baby care in the first 2 years of life. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 24.

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. . Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement. Pediatrics. 1995. 95: 152-156. (PubMed)

National Institutes of Health. . Early Identification of Hearing Impairment in Infants and Young Children. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health. In press.

Thompson MD, Thompson G. . Early identification of hearing loss: listen to parents. Clin Pediatr. 1991. 30: 77-80.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for hearing impairment. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 35.

Watkin PM, Baldwin M, Laoide S. . Parental suspicion and identification of hearing impairment. ArchDis Child. 1990. 65: 846-850.

7. Lead

Childhood lead poisoning is one of the most common, preventable health problems in the United States. From 1991 to 1994, an estimated 890,000 US children aged 1 to 5 years (4.4% of all children in this age group) had blood lead levels greater than or equal to 10 µg/dL, the current definition of lead toxicity. Although rates of lead poisoning are higher among low-income, inner-city children, no socioeconomic group, geographic area, or racial or ethnic population is spared.

Studies have shown that blood lead levels as low as 10 to 15 µg/dL are associated with diminished intelligence, impaired neurobehavioral development, decreased hearing acuity, and growth inhibition. Higher levels can cause severe damage to the central nervous, renal, and hematopoietic systems and can be fatal.

Children at risk for lead poisoning who are screened can be followed or treated based on their blood lead levels. If lead poisoning is diagnosed, the clinician needs to call the appropriate local health authority to help determine the lead source. In several states, reporting to the local health department is required. Local public health departments may initiate community-wide educational programs and environmental assessments in response to such reports. Expert consultation for treating and following lead toxicity should be obtained by contacting the state or local health department, a university medical center, or a certified regional poison control center.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Family Physicians --
Determination of lead levels is recommended for infants at 12 months of age who live in communities in which the prevalence of lead levels requiring intervention is high or undefined; live in or frequently visit a home built before 1950 with dilapidated paint or with recent or ongoing renovation or remodeling; have close contact with a person who has an elevated lead level; live near lead industry or heavy traffic; live with someone whose job or hobby involves lead exposure; use lead-based pottery; or take traditional remedies that contain lead.


American Academy of Pediatrics --
Pediatric-care providers should increase their efforts to screen children for lead exposure. Blood lead screening should be a part of routine health supervision of children and can best be addressed by increasing children's access to health care. Because lead is ubiquitous in the US environment, this screening should occur at about 9 to 12 months of age and, if possible, again at about 24 months of age. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has raised the possibility that there may be low-risk communities that do not require screening, but no explicit guidance has been developed for determining a community's risk. As more data are collected, it may become evident that there are locales where selective screening of children is more appropriate than routine screening.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against universal lead screening of children to detect mild or moderate lead exposure. Screening is recommended for children at high risk: children who live in or regularly visit homes built before 1960 with deteriorating paint or recent, ongoing, or planned renovation or remodeling; who have a sibling, housemate, or playmate known to have had lead poisoning; who live with an adult whose job or hobby involves exposure to lead; or who live near lead industries or busy highways.


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) --
(NOTE: Revised guidelines are expected to be published in the fall of 1997. Revisions to the CDC guidelines were being considered at the time of this publication. Please consult Provider Resources below for information on how to obtain current recommendations.) CDC's draft guidelines recommend that state and local health officials make screening recommendations that are based on an assessment of local lead exposure sources and on blood lead screening data. Where risk is widespread, universal screening should be recommended; where risk is less or confined to small pockets, targeted screening should be recommended. Screening should be focused on children at 12 and at 24 months of age. A targeted screening recommendation would call for screening of children who meet criteria established by the health department. Likely criteria include: residence in a high-risk zip code or neighborhood, poverty, or response to a personal-risk questionnaire that is tailored to local conditions. An example of one such basic questionnaire is presented in Table 7.1. Health departments will be expected to tailor the questionnaire to make it appropriate to local sources of exposure.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
Screening for elevated lead levels by measuring blood lead at least once at about 12 months of age is recommended for all children at increased risk of lead exposure. All children with identifiable risk factors should be screened, as should children living in communities in which the prevalence of blood lead levels requiring individual intervention, including chelation therapy or residential lead hazard control, is high or undefined. If capillary blood is used, elevated lead levels should be confirmed by measurement of venous blood lead. The optimal frequency of screening for lead exposure in children, or for repeated testing of children previously found to have elevated blood lead levels, is unknown and is left to clinical discretion; consideration should be given to the degree of elevation, the interventions provided, and the natural history of lead exposure, including the typical peak in lead levels at 18 to 24 months of age. In communities where the prevalence of blood lead levels requiring individual intervention is low, a strategy of targeted screening, possibly using locale-specific questionnaires of known and acceptable sensitivity and specificity, can be used to identify high-risk children who should have blood lead testing. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend an exact population prevalence below which targeted screening can be substituted for universal screening. Clinicians should seek guidance from their local or state health department.
top link

Basics of Lead Screening

1. Begin risk assessment and counseling during prenatal visits and continue after birth during regular office visits until the child is at least 6 years of age. Counsel parents against sanding old lead paint while remodeling during pregnancy.

2. Evaluate each child's risk of lead toxicity. Use of a structured set of questions such as that developed by CDC (Table 7.1) can be very helpful. If the answer to any of the questions is positive, consider the child at high risk for exposure.

3. Measurement of the blood lead level is more sensitive and specific than measurement of the erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) level.

4. Screening blood lead levels may be obtained from capillary sampling. Follow the precautions listed in Table 7.2 to minimize the chance of contamination from environmental sources. Confirm elevated blood lead test results (15 µg/dL or greater) obtained on capillary specimens by using venous blood. A child with a capillary lead level of 70 µg/dL or greater requires immediate retesting using a venous sample.

5. Interpret and manage blood lead test results according to the CDC recommendations listed in Table 7.3. Several states require primary care providers and persons in charge of lead screening programs to report both presumptive and confirmed cases of lead toxicity to the appropriate health agency.

6. Laboratories where blood is tested for lead levels must participate in a blood-lead proficiency testing program, such as the collaborative program between the Health Resources and Services Administration and CDC. Information on this program is available by calling the Wisconsin State Hygiene Laboratory (608)262-1146.

7. Because iron deficiency can enhance lead absorption and toxicity, test all children with blood lead levels of 20 µg/dL or greater for iron deficiency.

8. Provide guidance to parents about creating an environment safe from lead exposure for their children. Include advice on eliminating peeling or chipping paint, decreasing the lead content of water, preventing contact via hobbies or contaminated work clothing, remaining alert for pica behavior, and assuring good hygiene. ( See Patient Resources for publications to aid in counseling.)

top link

Patient Resources


Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Lead-Based Paint. Internet access: htp://www.hud.gov/lea


National Lead Information Center of the National Safety Council; (800)LEADFYI.


What Everyone Should Know About Lead Poisoning. To obtain individual copies, contact: Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, 600 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington, DC 20003. To obtain bulk copies, contact: Channing L. Bete Co, Inc, 200 State Rd, South Deerfield, MA 01373; (800)628-7733.


Protect your family from lead in your home. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lead Poisoning Prevention Program, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333; (770)488-7330.
top link

Provider Resources


Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children: A Statement by the Centers for Disease Control; The Strategic Plan for the Elimination of Lead Poisoning; Nutrition and Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lead Poisoning Prevention Program, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333; (770)488-7330.


Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Lead Toxicity. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of Health Education, Mailstop E33, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333; (404)639-6205.
top link

Selected References

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. . Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Lead Toxicity. Atlanta, Ga: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control; September 1992. US Department of Health and Human Services.

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening children for lead exposure in Canada. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 25.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Update: Blood Lead Levels ---United States, 1991-1994. MMWR. 1997. 46(7): 141-144.

Centers for Disease Control. . Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children: A Statement by the Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 1991. US Department of Health and Human Services.

Crocetti AF, Mushak P, Schwartz J. . Determination of numbers of lead-exposed US children by areas of the United States: an integrated summary of a report to the US Congress on childhood lead poisoning. Environ Health Perspect. 1990. 89: 109-120. (PubMed)

DeBaun MR, Sox HC. . Setting the optimal erythrocyte protoporphyrin screening decision threshold for lead poisoning: a decision analytic approach. Pediatrics. 1991. 88: 121-131. (PubMed)

Mahaffey KR, Annest JL, Roberts J, Murphy RS. . National estimates of blood lead levels: United States, 1976-1980. N Engl J Med. 1982. 307: 573-579. (PubMed)

Needleman HL. . The persistent threat of lead: a singular opportunity. Am J Public Health. 1989. 79: 643-645. (PubMed)

Needleman HL, Schell A, Bellinger D, Leviton A, Allred EN. . The long-term effects of exposure to low doses of lead in childhood: an 11-year follow-up report. N Engl J Med. 1990. 322: 83-88. (PubMed)

Ratcliffe SD, Lee J, Lutz LJ, Woolley FR, et al. . Lead toxicity and iron deficiency in Utah migrant children. Am J Public Health. 1989. 79: 631-633. (PubMed)

Ruff HA, Bijur PE, Markowitz M, Yeou-Cheng M, Rosen JF. . Declining blood lead levels and cognitive changes in moderately lead-poisoned children. JAMA. 1993. 269: 1641-1654. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for elevated lead levels in childhood and pregnancy. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 23.

Tables

Table 7.1. Recommended Questions for Assessing Lead Exposure Risk


Does your child live in or regularly visit a house built before 1950? (Including daycare centers, preschools, homes of baby-sitters or relatives)
Does your child live in or regularly visit a house built before 1978 (the year lead-based paint was banned for residential use) with recent, ongoing, or planned renovation or remodeling?
Does your child have a sibling, housemate, or playmate being followed or treated for lead poisoning (blood lead level 15 µg/dL)?



Adapted from: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Screening Young Children for Lead Poisoning. Expected date of publication: 1997.

Table 7.2. Recommendations for Minimizing the Contamination of Capillary Blood Samples Obtained by Finger Stick


Personnel who collect specimens should be well trained in and completely familiar with the collection procedure and observe universal precautions.
Puncturing the fingers of infants younger than 1 year of age is not recommended. The heel is a more suitable site for these children.
If examination gloves are coated with powder, rinse them with tap water.
Thoroughly wash the child's hands or heel with soap and water, and then dry with a clean, low-lint towel.
Once the finger or heel to be punctured is washed, clean it with alcohol; do not allow it to come into contact with any surface, including the child's other fingers.
Although its effectiveness in reducing contamination is under study, silicone spray can be used to form a protective layer between the skin and blood droplets.
Use sterile gauze or a cotton ball to wipe off the first droplet of blood, which contains tissue fluids.
Do not collect blood that has run down the finger or onto the fingernail.
Avoid contact between the skin and the collection container.



Adapted from: Centers for Disease Control. Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children: A Statement by the Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 1991.

Table 7.3. CDC Recommendations for Follow-up of Blood Lead Measurements


Blood Lead
Level (BLL)
(µg/dL)
Action

<9 Reassess or rescreen in 1 year. No additional action necessary unless exposure sources change
10-14 Family lead education
Follow-up testing
Social services, if necessary
15-19 Family lead education
Follow-up testing
Social services, if necessary
If BLLs persist (ie, 2 venous BLLs in this range at least 3 months apart) or worsen, proceed according to actions for BLLs 20-44
20-44 Coordination of care (case-management)
Clinical management *
Environmental investigation
Lead-hazard reduction
45-69 Within 48 hours, begin coordination of care (case management), clinical management*, environmental investigation, lead hazard reduction
>70 Hospitalize child and begin medical treatment immediately. Begin coordination of care (case management), clinical management*, environmental investigation and lead-hazard reduction immediately



* Refer to CDC source publication, Screening Young Children for Lead Poisoning, for description of clinical management.


Adapted from: Centers for Disease Control. Screening Young Children for Lead Poisoning. Expected date of publication: 1997.

8. Newborn Screening

Virtually all states require screening of newborns for congenital hypothyroidism and phenylketonuria (PKU). Testing for galactosemia and hemoglobinopathies is required in a majority of states, and some states require screening of newborns for maple syrup urine disease, homocystinuria, biotinidase deficiency, tyrosinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, cystic fibrosis, and toxoplasmosis. Table 8.1 provides a state-by-state listing of newborn screening policies.

Hypothyroidism
Most children with congenital hypothyroidism who are not identified and treated promptly suffer the irreversible mental retardation, growth failure, deafness, and neurologic abnormalities characteristic of the syndrome of cretinism. The incidence of this disorder is 1 per 3600 to 1per 5000 live births. Infants who receive adequate treatment with thyroxine within the first weeks of life have normal or near-normal intellectual performance at 4 to 7 years of age.

Phenylketonuria (PKU)
Phenylketonuria is an autosomal recessive aminoacidopathy that leads to severe, irreversible mental retardation (IQbelow 50) if it is not treated during infancy. The incidence of this disorder is 1 per 10,000 to 1 per 15,000 live births. Most children who undergo early screening, diagnosis, and optimal treatment with dietary restriction of phenylalanine will be in the normal range of intelligence.

Galactosemia
Galactosemia presents following milk feeding with vomiting, diarrhea, failure to thrive, and Escherichia coli septicemia (which is often fatal). Continued exposure to galactose results in liver disease (manifested by hepatomegaly, jaundice, and cirrhosis), cataracts, and irreversible mental retardation. The incidence of galactosemia is 1 per 60,000 to 1 per 80,000 live births. Treatment is directed to the elimination of dietary lactose by avoiding galactose in breast milk, cow's milk, and infant formulas. Treatment can lead to dramatic improvement in all clinical features except for central nervous system dysfunction.

Hemoglobinopathies
Sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies, such as thalassemia and hemoglobin E, aremost common in persons of African, Mediterranean, Asian, Caribbean, and South andCentral American ancestry. Affected individuals may have overwhelming sepsis, chronic hemolytic anemia, episodic vascular occlusive crises, hyposplenism, periodic splenic sequestration, and bone marrow aplasia. Carriers (genetic heterozygotes) do not suffer significant morbidity. Early detection of sickle cell disease in newborns allows prophylactic use of penicillin to prevent septicemia and prompt clinical intervention for infection and sequestration crises.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Newborn screening should be performed according to each state's regulations.

National authorities have made recommendations for the following specific conditions:

Hypothyroidism


American Academy of Family Physicians --
Neonatal screening for thyroid function abnormalities is recommended.


American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Thyroid Association (ATA), Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (CTFPHE), and US Preventive Services Task Force --
All neonates should be screened for congenital hypothyroidism between 2 and 6 days of life. Care should be taken to assure that infants born at home, ill at birth, or transferred between hospitals in the first week of life are screened before 7 days of life. According to the CTFPHE, it is better to obtain a specimen within 24 hours of birth than no specimen at all. According to the AAP and ATA, blood should be obtained from infants before discharge from the hospital or after 48 hours of age.
top link

Phenylketonuria (PKU)


American Academy of Family Physicians --
Neonatal screening for PKU is recommended.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (CTFPHE) and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) --
All infants should be screened for PKU before discharge from the nursery. Premature infants and those with illness should be tested at or near 7 days of age. Infants tested before 24 hours of age should receive a repeat screening. According to the CTFPHE, this should occur between 2 and 7 days of age; according to the USPSTF, this should occur by 2 weeks of age.
top link

Hemoglobinopathies


American Academy of Family Physicians --
Neonatal screening for hemoglobinopathies is recommended.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) --
Neonatal screening for sickle hemoglobinopathies is recommended. Whether such screening should be universal or targeted to high-risk groups will depend on the proportion of high-risk individuals in the screening area. All screening must be accompanied by comprehensive counseling and treatment services. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening for hemoglobinopathies in adolescents and young adults in order to help them make informed reproductive decisions. According to the USPSTF, such screening may be justified on the basis of burden of suffering and patient preference.


Sickle Cell Disease Guideline Panel of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Public Health Service --
Universal screening for sickle cell disease should be conducted on all newborns. This recommendation has been endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Nurses Association, and the National Medical Association.
top link

Basics of Newborn Screening

Schedule 1

1. For the full-term, well neonate, obtain the specimen as close as possible to the time of discharge from the nursery and in no case later than 7 days of age. If the initial specimen is obtained earlier than 24 hours after birth, obtain a second specimen at 1 or 2 weeks of age to decrease the probability that PKU and other disorders with metabolite accumulation will be missed.

2. For any premature infant, any infant receiving parenteral feeding, or any neonate being treated for illness, obtain a specimen for screening at or near the seventh day of life if a specimen has not been obtained before that time, regardless of feeding status. For infants requiring transfusion or dialysis before the standard time for obtaining a specimen, obtain the sample for screening before transfusion or dialysis, if the neonate's condition is amenable. If asample cannot be obtained beforehand, ensure that an adequate specimen is obtained at a time when the plasma or red blood cells, or both, will again reflect the child's own metabolic processes or phenotype.

top link

Collection Technique 2

1. Apply the same standards and techniques for the collection of blood specimens for neonatal screening programs for all of the congenital diseases. State screening agencies hold individual hospitals accountable for instituting policies thatassure proper collection of filter-paper blood samples.

2. Enter the required information on the specimen collection kit with a ballpoint pen, not a soft-tip pen or typewriter.

3. Universal precautions: Use all appropriate precautions, including wearing gloves, when handling blood, and dispose of used lancets in a biohazard container for sharp objects.

4. Site Selection: The source of blood must be the most lateral surface of the plantar aspect (walking surface) of the infant's heel. Skin punctures to obtain blood specimens must not be performed on the central area of the newborn's foot (area of the arch) or on the fingers of newborns. Puncturing the heel on the posterior curvature will permit blood to flow away from the puncture, making proper spotting difficult. Do not lance a previous puncture site.

5. Site Preparation: Warm the puncture site to increase blood flow. Place a warm, moist towel at a temperature no higher than 42°C (108°F) on the site for 3 minutes. Holding the infant's leg in a position lower than the heart will increase venous pressure.

6. Cleaning the Site: Clean the infant's heel with 70% isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol). Wipe away excess alcohol with a dry sterile gauze or cotton ball, and allow the heel to air-dry thoroughly. Failure to wipe off alcohol residue may dilute the specimen and adversely affect test results.

7. Puncture: To ensure sufficient blood flow, puncture the plantar surface of the infant's heel with a sterile lancet to a depth of 2.0 to 2.4 mm or with an automated lancet device. Wipe away the first drop of blood with sterile gauze. In small premature infants, the heel bone may be no more than 2.4 mm beneath the plantar heel skin surface and half this distance at the posterior curvature of the heel. Puncturing deeper may risk bone damage. Do not milk or squeeze the puncture site, as this may cause hemolysis and admixture of tissue fluids with the specimen.

8. Filter Paper Handling and Application: Avoid touching the area within the printed circle on the filter paper before collection. Gently touch the filter paper against a large drop of blood and, in one step, allow a sufficient quantity of blood to soak through to completely fill the circle on the filter paper. Do not press the paper against the puncture site on the heel. Apply blood to only one side of the filter paper. Examine both sides of thefilter paper to assure that the blood penetrates and saturates the paper. Do not layer successive drops of blood within the circle. If blood flow diminishes so that the circle is incompletely filled, repeat the sampling steps at a different site. Do not touch the blood sample after collection; do not allow water, feeding formulas, antiseptic solutions, or any other contaminant to come into contact with the sample. Allow the sample to dry thoroughly before insertion into the envelope. Insufficient drying can adversely affect test results.

9. Hemostasis: After blood has been collected from the heel of the newborn, elevate the foot above the body and press a sterile gauze pad or cotton ball against the puncture site until the bleeding stops.

top link

Documentation

Ensure that children receive proper newborn screening and that test results are reviewed. Be aware of patients who are at increased risk for not being screened. Such patients include sick or premature neonates, neonates undergoing adoption or being transferred within or between hospitals, infants born at home, children of transient or homeless families, and infants born outside the United States and Canada. Document newborn screening results in an easily accessible part of the patient record for future reference.top link

Follow-up

Confirm all abnormal results with retesting. With certain rare exceptions (eg, galactosemia and maple syrup urine disease), do not initiate treatment until a confirmatory test result has been obtained. Prompt physical examination of patients with abnormal results is important. Start all patients with sickle cell disease on penicillin prophylaxis as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed.top link

Counseling

Provide appropriate counseling to all parents of children with abnormal test results. Provide information about the significance of the results and the need for retesting, the implications for the child's health, treatment regimens, symptoms to be alert for, and genetic issues for future childbearing.top link

Patient Resources


Sickle Cell Disease: Guide for Parents. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publications Clearinghouse, PO Box 8547, Silver Spring, MD 20907; (800)358-9295.


Sickle Cell Anemia (New Hope for People With). FDA Office of Consumer Affairs. HFE 88 Room 1675, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20857; (800)532-4440.


Understanding PKU. PKU Clinic, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115; (617)355-6394.
top link

Provider Resources


Sickle Cell Disease: Clinical Practice Guideline; Sickle Cell Disease: Guideline Report; Sickle Cell Disease: Quick Reference Guide. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publications Clearinghouse, PO Box 8547, Silver Spring, MD 20907; (800)358-9295.


Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Neonatal Screening Programs -- Second Edition; Approved Standard. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), 940 W Valley Rd, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898. An educational videotape depicting the LA4-A2 collection procedure is also available.


Management and Therapy of Sickle Cell Disease. NIH publication No. 96-2117. NHLBI Information Center, PO Box 30105, Bethesda, MD 20814-0105.


New England Connection for PKU and Allied Disorders, 16 Angelina Ln, Mansfield, MA 02048. Various brochures on PKU, maple syrup urine disease, homocystinuria, tyrosinemia, urea cycle disorders, and organic acidemias are available; (508)261-1291.


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Issues in newborn screening. Pediatrics. 1992. 89: 345-349. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with sickle cell diseases and their families. Pediatrics. 1996. 98: 467-472. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with achondroplasia. Pediatrics. 1995. 95: 443-451. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics. 1994. 93: 855-859. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Newborn screening fact sheets. Pediatrics. 1989. 83: 449-464. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Prenatal genetic diagnosis for pediatricians. Pediatrics. 1994. 93: 1010-1015. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics. 1996. 98: 297-300. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with Marfan syndrome. Pediatrics. 1996. 98: 978-982. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on genetics. . Health supervision for children with neurofibromatosis. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 368-372. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. . Health supervision for children with Turner syndrome. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 1166-1173. (PubMed)

American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Committee on Public Health. . Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism: recommendations for guidelines. Pediatrics. 1993. 91: 1203-1209. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening for congenital hypothyroidism. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 18.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening for hemoglobinopathies in Canada. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 20.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening for phenylketonuria. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 17.

Donnell G, ed. . Galactosemia: New Frontiers in Research. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Development; 1993.

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Illinois Department of Public Health. . An Overview of Newborn Screening Programs in the United States and Canada. Springfield, Ill: Illinois Department of Public Health; 1996.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. . Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Neonatal Screening Programs ---Second Edition; Approved Standard. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1992.

National Institutes of Health. . Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease and Other Hemoglobinopathies. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. 1987. 6(9): 1-22.

National Screening Status Report. . Infant Screening. 1993. 16(1): -.

Sickle Cell Disease Guideline Panel, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. . Sickle Cell Disease: Screening, Diagnosis, Management, and Counseling in Newborns and Infants. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 6. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services; April 1993. DHHS publication AHCPR 93-0562.

Therrell BL, ed. . Methods for Neonatal Screening. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1993.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for congenital hypothyroidism. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 45.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for hemoglobinopathies. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 43.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for phenylketonuria. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 44.

Tables

Table 8.1. Newborn Screening By State


STATE MANDATED BIO CAH CF GAL HGB HCU HYPO MSUD PKU TOXO TYR
ND · · · · ·

AL · · · · · ·
AK · · · · · · ·
AZ · · · · · · · ·
AR · · · · ·
CA · · · · ·
CO · · · · · · ·
CT · · · · · · · · ·
DE · · · · · ·
FL · · · · · ·
GA · · · · · · · · ·
HI · · ·
ID · · · · · · ·
IL · · · · · · ·
IN · · · · · · ·
IA · · · · · ·
KA · · · · ·
KY · · · · ·
LA · · · ·
ME · · · · · · ·
MD · · · · · · · · ·
MA · · · · · · · · · ·
MI · · · · · · · ·
MN · · · · · ·
MS · · · · ·
MO · · · · ·
MT · · · · · ·
NE · · · · · ·
NV · · · · · · ·
NH · · · · · · · ·
NJ · · · · ·
NM · · · · · ·
NY · · · · · · · ·
NC · · · · · ·
OH · · · · · ·
OK · · · · ·
OR · · · · · · ·
PA · · · · ·
RI · · · · · · · · ·
SC · · · · · ·
SD · · · ·
TN · · · · ·
TX · · · · · ·
UT · · · ·
VT · · · · · · · ·
VA · · · · · · · ·
WA · · · · ·
DC · · · · · · ·
WV · · · · ·
WI · · · · · · · ·
WY · · · · · · ·
Key
BIO Biotinidase Deficiency
CAH Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
CF Cystic Fibrosis
GAL Galactosemia
HGB Hemoglobinopathies
HCU Homocystinuria
HYPO Congenital Hypothyroidism
MSUD Maple Syrup Urine Disease
PKU Phenylketonuria
TOXO Toxoplasmosis
TYR Tyrosinemia



Adapted from: Illinois Department of Public Health. An Overview of Newborn Screening Programs in the United States and Canada. Springfield, Ill, Illinois Department of Public Health; 1996.

Notes




1 Adapted from: American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Genetics. Issues in newborn screening. Pediatrics. 1992;89:345-349. Reproduced by permission of Pediatrics; copyright ©1992. top link



2 Adapted from: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Neonatal Screening Programs ---Second Edition; Approved Standard. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1992. Permission to use portions of NCCLS document LA4-A2 has been granted by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; copyright ©1992. top link

9. Tuberculosis (Including Prophylaxis and BCG Vaccination)

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a public health problem in the United States for both children and adults. Although the number of new TB cases in the United States among children younger than 15 years of age declined steadily from 1953 (when national surveillance for TB began) until 1988, the number of new cases increased 51% between 1988 and 1992 (from 1133 to 1708). Despite a drop in new TB cases in children between 1992 and 1995, 38% more new cases occurred in 1995 compared with 1988. Factors contributing to the increase in the number of TB cases include adverse social and economic conditions, the epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, immigration of individuals with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, and noncompliance of clinicians and patients with recommended screening and treatment regimens. The recent emergence of multiple-drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis has added urgency to the need for improved preventive efforts to combat the disease.

Of additional concern is that the number of TB cases among children younger than age 2 years is twice that among older children. Young children, in whom early TB disease may go unrecognized because their TB skin tests may be negative and because they may have few symptoms of disease, are more likely to develop severe disease such as meningitis or miliary tuberculosis than older children or adults. Young children are also more likely to progress from primary TB infection to active disease in a shorter time period than older children and adults.

The diagnosis of TB disease in a child is a sentinel event, signifying recent and ongoing transmission of M. tuberculosis in the community. In most states, the clinician is responsible for reporting cases of TB to the appropriate local or state health department, in order to initiate an epidemiologic investigation to identify and to treat infectious cases and contacts in the community.

Pediatric populations at high risk for TB disease include foreign born, African American, and Hispanic children. General populations at high risk of tuberculous infection include: 1) close contacts of persons known or suspected to have TB; 2) persons infected with HIV; 3) persons who inject illicit drugs or other locally identified high-risk substance abusers (eg, crack cocaine users); 4) persons who have medical risk factors known to increase the risk for TB disease if infection occurs; 5) residents and employees of high-risk congregate settings (eg, correctional institutions, nursing homes, mental institutions, other long-term residential facilities, and shelters for the homeless); 6) health-care workers who serve high-risk clients; 7) foreign-born persons, including children, who have arrived within 5 years from countries with a high incidence or prevalence of TB; and 8) some medically underserved, low-income populations.

Conditions and chronic diseases that predispose patients to development of TB disease include HIV infection, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, and hematologic and reticuloendothelial diseases; history of intestinal bypass or gastrectomy, chronic malabsorption syndromes, silicosis, cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract or oropharynx, prolonged steroid use, and immunosuppressive therapy; and being 10% or more below desirable body weight.

Screening for TB consists of an intradermal injection of purified protein derivative (Mantoux test). A positive skin reaction (Table 9.1) necessitates additional work-up (chest x-rays, sputum smears and cultures) to differentiate between TB infection and TB disease. A drug regimen based on this evaluation will either be a prophylactic treatment of TB infection or a multi-drug treatment of TB disease (based on the organism's antibiotic sensitivities).

Isoniazid prophylaxis has been shown to be effective in preventing the progression of TB infection to clinical TB disease. When isoniazid is taken for 12 months, it reduces the occurrence of TB disease by 54% to 88%. The efficacy of isoniazid is directly related to the length of prophylaxis, the extent of patient compliance with the prophylactic regimen, and the susceptibility of the infecting organism to isoniazid.

In the United States, the use of Bacillus of Calmette and Guérin (BCG) vaccine to prevent TB infection is rarely indicated; however, new recommendations have been developed in light of two meta-analyses of BCG vaccine clinical trials, as well as the increase in TB cases and the outbreaks of multi-drug-resistant TB. The meta-analyses of BCG protective efficacy indicated that the vaccine efficacy for preventing serious forms of TB in children (meningeal and miliary) was high (>80%). (See Basics of: BCG Vaccination.)

Tuberculosis disease is currently designated as an infectious disease notifiable at the national level. Refer to Appendix C for further information on nationally notifiable diseases.

Recommendations of Major Authorities

Screening


All major authorities, including American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Academy of Family Physicians, American Medical Association, American Thoracic Society, Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) --
Tuberculin testing should be performed on children and adolescents at high risk of disease. AAP has recommended annual TB testing for infants and children with HIV and incarcerated adolescents; testing every 2 to 3 years for children exposed to individuals in certain high-risk groups (HIV infected, homeless, residents of nursing homes, institutionalized adolescents or adults, users of illicit drugs, incarcerated adolescents or adults and migrant farm workers); and testing at ages 4 to 6 years and 11 to 16 years for children without specific risk factors who reside in high prevalence areas and for children whose parents immigrated from regions with a high prevalence of TB or with continued potential exposure by travel to the endemic areas and/or household contact with persons from the endemic areas with unknown skin test status. The USPSTF has stated that the frequency of skin testing is a matter of clinical discretion.
top link

Prophylaxis


American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) --
Children with a positive Mantoux test and without active disease should receive prophylaxis with isoniazid. Certain children with a negative Mantoux test should be considered for isoniazid prophylaxis (See Basics of Prophylaxis: Indications). The AAP has also suggested prophylaxis for patients who are anergic and from a population with a high prevalence of TB. Recommendations for the duration of isoniazid prophylaxis vary among authorities. The ATS and CDC recommend a minimum of 6 months of prophylaxis; the AAP recommends a minimum of 9 months of prophylaxis. According to AAP recommendations, newborn prophylaxis may be discontinued at 3 months of age if a Mantoux test at that time is negative; if all known adult contacts have negative sputum samples and are compliant with anti-TB medications; and if a repeat Mantoux test is performed at 6 months of age. The ATS and CDC recommend maintaining newborn prophylaxis until a negative PPD test is obtained at 6 months of age. Patients who are HIV-positive or who have evidence of prior TB on chest radiograph should receive isoniazid prophylaxis for 12 months. In the latter case, a 4-month course of isoniazid combined with rifampin can also be used.
top link

BCG Vaccination


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) --
BCG vaccination should be considered for an infant or child who has a negative TB skin-test result if the following circumstances are present: the child is exposed continually to an untreated or ineffectively treated patient who has infectious pulmonary TB, and the child cannot be separated from the presence of the infectious patient or given long-term primary preventive therapy OR the child is exposed continually to a patient who had infectious pulmonary TB caused by M. tuberculosis strains resistant to isoniazid and rifampin, and the child cannot be separated from the presence of the infectious patient. The AAP and USPSTF also recommend consideration of BCG vaccination for infants and children in groups in which an excessive rate of new infections is present (eg, >1%) and the usual surveillance and treatment have failed or are not feasible (eg, in groups without a source of regular health care). In the United States, BCG vaccination is rarely indicated. Physicians considering the use of BCG vaccine for their patients are encouraged to consult the TB control programs in their area or the CDC's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination at (404)639-8120.
top link

Basics of Tuberculosis Screening

NOTE: Persons who are not likely to be infected with M. tuberculosis generally should not undergo skin testing, because the predictive value of a positive skin test in low-risk populations is poor.

1. The Mantoux test is the standard method of testing. Multiple-puncture tests should not be used to determine whether a person is infected.

2. For the Mantoux test, use 0.1 mL of purified protein derivative (PPD) containing 5 tuberculin units. Administer PPD using a disposable tuberculin syringe, with the bevel of the needle facing upward. Administer the injection intradermally on the volar surface of the forearm to produce a pale, discrete elevation of the skin (weal) 6 to 10 mm in diameter. The weal disappears shortly after the test is administered.

3. Read the test 48 to 72 hours after injection by measuring the diameter of induration (not erythema) transverse to the long axis of the forearm. Record the actual millimeters of induration. Do not consider the erythema that may surround the area of induration.

4. The definition of a positive skin test reaction depends on the likelihood of tuberculosis infection and the risk of tuberculosis disease if infection has occurred. A positive skin reaction can be expected 2 to 10 weeks after infection with TB has occurred.

5. Do not retest patients who have a documented history of a positive Mantoux test; such testing has no diagnostic utility.

6. Live-virus vaccines, such as measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella (VCV), and oral polio vaccine (OPV), may interfere with a response to a tuberculin skin test. The tuberculin skin test should either be administered on the same day as the live-virus vaccinations, or postponed until 4 to 6 weeks after the vaccinations.

top link

Basics of Tuberculosis Prophylaxis

1. Indications

A child with a positive Mantoux test result but without active disease is a candidate for isoniazid prophylaxis. Active disease is excluded by a normal chest radiograph and a lack of symptoms suggesting TB disease. See Table 43.1 for more information on general indications for prophylaxis.

Special pediatric cases should be considered candidates for isoniazid prophylaxis even if they lack documentation of a positive Mantoux test:

  • Newborn prophylaxis: Infants whose mothers have active disease (even if noncontagious) and infants whose mothers have a positive Mantoux test but do not have active disease (preventive therapy can be discontinued after the entire family is demonstrated to have negative tuberculin skin tests)
  • Children who are both anergic or HIV-positive and from populations where the prevalence of TB infection is higher than 10% (eg, injection drug users, homeless persons, migrant laborers, and individuals from Asia, Africa, or Latin America)
  • Children who have had close contact within the past 3 months with a person with infectious TB.
top link

2. Dosage and Administration

The recommended dosage of isoniazid is 10 to 15 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) given orally once daily. For noncompliant patients, 15 mg/kg (to a maximum of 900 mg) may be given twice weekly under the direct observation of a health professional.top link

3. Duration

Continue isoniazid prophylaxis for 6 to 12 months. Recommendations regarding the duration of isoniazid prophylaxis vary (See Recommendations of Major Authorities: Prophylaxis).top link

4. Precautions

Patients receiving isoniazid prophylaxis must be monitored monthly for signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, including loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, persistent dark urine, jaundice, fever, and abdominal tenderness (especially in the right upper quadrant). Isoniazid should be discontinued at the first sign of hepatotoxicity, and the patient evaluated for the cause of hepatitis. If isoniazid is not the cause of hepatotoxicity, consider reinstating isoniazid preventive therapy once the patient is clinically stable. In otherwise healthy children, the incidence of hepatitis during isoniazid therapy is low enough that routine screening with liver function testing is not required. Peripheral neuritis and convulsions caused by inhibition of pyridoxine metabolism by isoniazid have rarely occurred. When neuritis or convulsions occur during isoniazid treatment, consider accidental overdosage as a possible cause. Pyridoxine supplementation may be considered on an individual basis for breast-feeding children, children with deficient diets (particularly those low in meat and milk), and pregnant women.top link

Basics of BCG Vaccination

1. Indications

Recommendations differ slightly among authorities. (See Recommendations of Major Authorities.)top link

2. Vaccine Types

One BCG vaccine (Tice[reg]) is available in the United States. Other BCG preparations that are available for the treatment of bladder cancer are not intended for use as vaccines. Other vaccines are in use in Canada and Mexico.top link

3. Dose and Administration

> 30 days old: Drop 0.3 mL of the vaccine on the cleansed surface of the skin in the lower deltoid area. Administer the vaccine percutaneously by applying a multiple-puncture disc through the vaccine; the vaccine should flow into the puncture wounds and dry. A dressing is not required, but advise the patient to keep the site dry for 24 hours.

<30 days old: Administer only half the usual dose to infants younger than 30 days old. If an infant's indications for vaccination persist (ie, the TB skin test result is <5 mm induration), administer a full dose of vaccine at 1year of age.top link

4. Contraindications

Until the risks and benefits of BCG vaccination in immunocompromised populations are defined, BCG vaccination should not be administered to persons with impaired immune responses (ie, HIV infection, congenital immunodeficiency, leukemia, lymphoma, or generalized malignancy) or suppressed immune responses (from steroids, alkylating agents, antimetabolites, or radiation.) Although no harmful effects to the fetus have been associated with BCG vaccination, its use is not recommended during pregnancy.top link

5. Adverse reactions

A bluish-red pustule usually forms at the site within 2 to 3 weeks. After 6 weeks, the pustule ulcerates and forms a lesion approximately 5 mm in diameter. Healing is usually complete within 3 months, but a permanent scar usually occurs at the site. Keep draining lesions clean and bandaged. Hypertrophic scars occur in 28% to 33% of vaccinated persons, and keloid scars occur in 2% to 4% of vaccinees.

Although BCG vaccination often results in local adverse effects, serious or long-term complications are rare. Moderate axillary or cervical lymphadenopathy, induration and subsequent pustule formation at the injection site can be expected. More severe local reactions include ulceration at the site and regional suppurative lymphadenitis. Disseminated BCG infection is a rare occurrence, but it is the most serious complication of the vaccine, and can occur from 4 months to 2 years after the vaccination.top link

6. Interactions

BCG vaccination can cause false-positive Mantoux reactions, but these tuberculin skin test reactions decrease with time after vaccination, and reactions of 15 mm induration or larger are rare. The presence or size of a post-vaccination tuberculin skin-test reaction does not predict whether BCG will provide any protection against TB disease. In general, consider BCG-vaccinated individuals with positive Mantoux test results to have true infection with M. tuberculosis.top link

7. Follow-up

Perform tuberculin skin testing 3 months after BCG vaccination; record test results, in millimeters of induration, in the patient's medical record. The vaccinated person may continue to participate in ongoing skin-testing programs if results remain negative (<5 mm induration). Vaccinees who have positive skin-test results ( > 5 mm induration) after vaccination should not be retested unless exposed to a person with infectious TB. A diagnosis of TB infection and the use of preventive therapy should be considered for any BCG-vaccinated person who has a tuberculin skin-test reaction of 10 mm of induration, particularly if any of the following circumstances are present:

  • The vaccinated person is a contact of another person who has infectious TB, particularly if the infectious person has transmitted TB to others
  • The vaccinated person was born or has resided in a country in which the prevalence of TB is high
  • The vaccinated person is exposed continually to populations in which the prevalence of TB is high
top link

Patient Resources


Facts About the TB Skin Test; Facts About Tuberculosis. American Lung Association, 1740 Broadway, New York, NY 10019-4374; (212)315-8700.


TB: Get the Facts; Tuberculosis: Connection between TB and HIV. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Attn: Information Technology and Services, Mailstop E-06, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333; (404)639-1819.
top link

Provider Resources


Core Curriculum on Tuberculosis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1994. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Attn: Information Technology and Services, Mailstop E-06, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333; (404)639-1819.


Initial Therapy for TB in the Era of Multiple Drug Resistance; Mantoux Tuberculin Skin Testing (videotape). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Attn: Information Services Office, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta GA 30333; (404)639-8135.
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases. . Tuberculosis. In: 1994 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1994:480-500.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases. . Update on tuberculosis skin testing of children. Pediatrics. 1996. 97(2): 282-284. (PubMed)

American Medical Association. . Rationale and recommendation: Infectious diseases. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994: chap 15.

American Thoracic Society. . Control of tuberculosis in the United States. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992. 146: 1623-1633. (PubMed)

American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control. . Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990. 142: 725-735. (PubMed)

American Thoracic Society. . Treatment of tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994. 149: 1359-1374. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening and isoniazid prophylactic therapy for tuberculosis. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 62.

Centers for Disease Control. . Prevention and control of tuberculosis in US communities with at-risk minority populations and prevention and control of tuberculosis among homeless persons. MMWR. 1992. 4: 1-23.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Screening for tuberculosis and tuberculous infection in high-risk populations: recommendations of the Advisory Committee for the Elimination of Tuberculosis. MMWR. 1995. 44(RR-11): 19-34. (PubMed)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health care facilities, 1994. MMWR. 1994;43(RR-13).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Essential components of a tuberculosis prevention and control program; and Screening for tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in high-risk populations; recommendations of the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis. MMWR. 1995;44(RR-11).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . The role of BCG vaccine in the prevention and control of tuberculosis in the United States: a joint statement by the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR. 1996. 45(RR-4): 1-18.

Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, et al. . Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis: meta-analysis of published literature. JAMA. 1994. 271: 698-702. (PubMed)

Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass JB. . The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis. 1993. 17: 968-975. (PubMed)

Physician's Desk Reference. . Oradell, NJ: Medical Economics Company; 1993:898-899; 1689-1692.

Pust, RE. . Tuberculosis in the 1990s: resurgence, regimens, and resources. South Med J. 1992. 85: 584-593. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for tuberculosis infection (including BCG immunization). In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 25.

Ussery XT, Valway SE, McKenna M, Cauthen GM, McCray E, Onorato IM. . Epidemiology of tuberculosis among children in the United States: 1985 to 1994. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996. 15: 697-704. (PubMed)

Tables

Table 9.1. Definition of a Positive Mantoux Skin Test (5 Tuberculin Units of Purified Protein Derivative) in Children


http://www.aap.org/policy/01227t1.htm
Adapted from: American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Disease. Update on tuberculosis skin testing of children. Pediatrics 1996;97:282-284. Copyright 1996.

10. Urinalysis

Urinalysis can detect many abnormalities in the urine, including the presence of glucose, protein, red and white blood cells, bacteria, and bacterial breakdown products. Screening the urine of asymptomatic children for the presence of red blood cells and protein is generally not productive, because the causative disorders tend to be transient and benign. Screening for glucosuria is also of questionable value, because renal thresholds for glucose spillage vary, and the interval between onset of glucosuria and onset of the symptoms of diabetes mellitus is short. Screening for indicators of occult infection, such as white blood cells and bacteria, may be beneficial as a means of promoting early treatment.

During infancy, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is higher among boys (2.5%) than among girls (0.9%), in part because boys have structural abnormalities of the urinary tract more frequently than girls. After infancy, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is much higher among girls (1% to 2%) than among boys (<0.1%). Asymptomatic bacteriuria develops into symptomatic urinary tract infections in fewer than 10% of cases. Urinary tract infections can lead to renal scarring and permanent renal damage. Such damage generally occurs in children before 2 to 3 years of age, when screening is difficult because of problems of specimen collection. Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics may alter the composition of body flora and lead to infection with resistant bacteria.

Asymptomatic sexually transmitted diseases, particularly infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, are common in adolescents and young adults. The prevalence of asymptomatic chlamydial urethral infection in young males ranges from 6% to 11%. These infections can be passed to female partners, resulting in pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility. Recently, dipstick urinalysis has been advocated as a noninvasive initial screening technique for detecting such occult infections in sexually active young males. Such testing has moderate sensitivity and low specificity, necessitating additional follow-up testing of patients with positive results. The FDA has not approved these tests for screening for sexually transmitted diseases including C. trachomatis.

Recommendations of Major Authorities


American Academy of Family Physicians and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) --
Routine screening of males and most females for asymptomatic bacteriuria is not recommended; there is insufficient evidence for or against routine screening of diabetic women (including children and adolescents). The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination and the USPSTF recommend against screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urinalysis in infants, children, and adolescents.


American Academy of Pediatrics --
Urinalysis should be performed once at 5 years of age. Also, dipstick leukocyte esterase testing to screen for sexually transmitted diseases should be performed once in adolescence, preferably at 14 years of age.


American Medical Association and Bright Futures --
Sexually active adolescent males should be screened yearly for gonorrhea and chlamydia by urinalysis with a dipstick leukocyte esterase test.
top link

Basics of Urinalysis

1. To obtain urine from infants and young children, apply a plastic urine bag to the perineum. This method is associated with a relatively high rate of false-positive results (up to 30%) because of contamination. Positive test results of urine obtained by bag collection should be confirmed by catheterization or suprapubic aspiration.

2. In screening children and adolescents for bacteriuria, obtain specimens using midstream "clean catch" techniques. This method permits follow-up culture testing of dipstick-positive specimens. The vulva of girls and the glans of boys should be cleansed well with a mild soap solution. Do not use antiseptic solutions because of the potential for suppressing bacterial growth in the sample. During urination, the labia of girls should be held open to avoid impinging on the flow of urine. This may be accomplished without manual holding by having the girl sit backward with legs astride a toilet seat. The foreskin of uncircumcised boys should be retracted to avoid impinging on the flow of urine.

3. The sensitivity of screening for bacteriuria may be improved by obtaining a specimen from the first void of the day, which is more concentrated and contains higher amounts of bacteria and bacterial breakdown products compared with subsequent voids. Specimen collection from later voids is acceptable and may be more practical.

4. The dipstick leukocyte esterase test is the most efficient way to screen specimens for bacteriuria. The sensitivity and specificity of both this test and the more labor-intensive microscopic analysis are roughly equivalent (approximately 80%). The nitrite test is also available on many dipsticks, but its low sensitivity, approximately 30%, makes it an inadequate screening tool if used alone. A positive nitrite test result, however, is approximately 99% specific for significant bacteriuria.

5. To screen males for sexually transmitted diseases, collect a urine sample from the first 15 to 20 mL of a void and test the unspun sample with a leukocyte esterase dipstick. Because of the poor specificity and relatively high cost of this test, as well as the potential morbidity associated with treatment, confirm positive test results with more specific techniques, such as enzyme immunoassay and/or culture. Negative results from symptomatic males should always be confirmed by enzyme immunoassay and/or culture.

top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617. (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

American Medical Association. . Guidelines for adolescent preventive services. In: AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994:xxix-xxxviii.

Aronson MD, Phillips RS. . Screening young men for Chlamydia infection. JAMA. 1993. 270: 2097-2098. (PubMed)

Boehm JJ, Haynes JL. . Bacteriology of "midstream catch" urines. Am J Dis Child. 1966. 111: 366-369. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Screening for urinary infection in asymptomatic infants and children. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 21.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . The periodic health examination 1979. Can Med Assoc J. 1979. 121: 1193-1254. (PubMed)

Dodge WF. . Cost effectiveness of renal disease screening. Am J Dis Child. 1977. 131: 1274-1280. (PubMed)

Edelmann CM, Ogwo JE, Fine BP, Martinez AB. . The prevalence of bacteriuria in full-term and premature newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1973. 82: 125-132. (PubMed)

Genc M, Ruusuvaara, Mardh PA. . An economic evaluation of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males. JAMA. 1993. 270: 2057-2064. (PubMed)

Goldsmith BM, Campos JM. . Comparison of urine dipstick, microscopy, and culture for the detection of bacteriuria in children. Clin Pediatr. 1990. 29: 214-218.

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Lindberg U. . Asymptomatic bacteriuria in school girls: V. The clinical course and response to treatment. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1975. 64: 718-724. (PubMed)

Lohr JA, Donowitz LG, Dudley SM. . Bacterial contamination rates for non-clean-catch and clean-catch midstream urine collections in boys. J Pediatr. 1986. 109: 659-660. (PubMed)

Lohr JA, Donowitz LG, Dudley SM. . Bacterial contamination rates in voided urine collections in girls. J Pediatr. 1989. 114: 91-93. (PubMed)

Kemper KJ, Avner ED. . The case against screening urinalyses for asymptomatic bacteriuria in children. Am J Dis Child. 1992. 146: 343-346. (PubMed)

Kunin CM. . Detection, Prevention and Management of Urinary Tract Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger, 1987.

Mitchell N, Stapleton FB. . Routine admission urinalysis examination in pediatric patients: a poor value. Pediatrics. 1990. 86: 345-349. (PubMed)

Quinn C, Gaydos C, Shepherd M, Bobo L, et al. . Epidemiologic and microbiologic correlates of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexual partnerships. JAMA. 1996. 276: 1727-1742.

Schlager TA, Dunn ML, Dudley SM, Lohr JA. . Bacterial contamination rate of urine collected in a urine bag from healthy non-toilet-trained male infants. J Pediatr. 1990. 116: 738-739. (PubMed)

Shafer M, Schachter J, Moncada J, et al. . Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males. JAMA. 1993. 270: 2065-2070. (PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 31.

Zhanel GG, Harding GKM, Guay DRP. . Asymptomatic bacteriuria. Which patients should be treated? Arch Intern Med. 1990. 150: 1389-1396. (PubMed)

11. Vision

Refractive errors are the most common vision disorders in children, occurring in 20% of children by age 16years. Amblyopia ("lazy eye") develops in 2% to 5% of children, and the risk of developing this disorder is greatest during the first 2 to 3 years of life. The potential for its development exists, however, until visual development is complete at 9 years of age. Untreated amblyopia may result in irreversible visual deficits. Strabismus,one of the primary causes of amblyopia, occurs in 2% of children. Other eye diseases occurring during infancy and childhood include cataracts (1 per 1000 live births), congenital glaucoma (1 per 10,000 live births), and retinoblastoma (1 per 20,000 live births).

Through careful history, examination, vision testing, and appropriate referral, amblyopia and other ophthalmologic disorders can be detected and visual impairment can be lessened or averted. Early detection and prompt intervention are essential.

Recommendations of Major Authorities

Normal-Risk Children


American Academy of Family Physicians --
Children should be screened for amblyopia and strabismus at 3 to 4 years of age.


American Academy of Pediatrics and Bright Futures --
Visual acuity testing should first be performed at 3 years of age. If the child is uncooperative, retesting should occur 6 months later. Subsequent testing should occur at 4, 5, 10, 12, 15, and 18 years of age. Subjective assessment by history should occur at visits at all other ages. All infants should be examined by 6 months of age to evaluate fixation preference, alignment, and presence of any eye disease. Children should again be medically evaluated for these problems by 3 to 4 years of age.


American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS), and American Optometric Association (AOA) --
Eye and vision screening should be performed at birth and at approximately 6 months, 3 years, and 5 years of age. AAO has published recommendations regarding screening methods and indications for referral to be used by primary care clinicians in screening preschool children (Table 11.1). AAO and AAPOS recommend that screening after 5 years of age be carried out at routine school checks or after the appearance of symptoms. AOA recommends optometric examinations every 2 years throughout school years.


Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
Repeat examination of the eyes for strabismus is recommended during well-baby visits, especially during the first 6 months of life. There is fair evidence to include testing of visual acuity in the periodic health examination of preschool children.


US Preventive Services Task Force --
All children should have testing for amblyopia and strabismus once before entering school, preferably at 3 to 4 years of age. Stereoacuity testing may be more effective than visual acuity testing in detecting these conditions. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for diminished visual acuity among asymptomatic school children. Recommendations against such screening can be made on other grounds, including the inconvenience and cost of routine screening and the fact that refractive errors can be readily corrected when they produce symptoms. Clinicians should be alert for signs of ocular misalignment when examining all newborns, infants, and children.
top link

High-Risk Children


American Academy of Ophthalmology --
Asymptomatic children should have a comprehensive examination by an ophthalmologist if they are at high risk because of health and developmental problems that make screening by the primary care clinician difficult or inaccurate (eg, retinopathy of prematurity or diagnostic evaluation of a complex disease with ophthalmic manifestations); a family history of conditions that cause or are associated with eye or vision problems (eg, retinoblastoma, significant hyperopia, strabismus [particularly accommodative esotropia], amblyopia, congenital cataract, or glaucoma); multiple health problems, systemic disease, or use of medications that are known to be associated with eye disease and vision abnormalities (eg, neurodegenerative disease, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, systemic steroid therapy, systemic syndromes with ocular manifestations, or developmental delay with visual system manifestations).


American Optometric Association --
The primary care clinician should remain alert for visual/ocular abnormalities associated with the following high-risk groups: infants who are premature, with low birth weight, or whose mothers have had rubella, venereal disease, AIDS-related infection or a history of substance abuse or other medical problems during pregnancy, and children failing to progress educationally or exhibiting reading and/or learning disabilities. The presence of high refractive error or a family history of eye disease, crossed eyes, or congenital eye disorders also places infants and children at risk. Infants at risk should be examined by a doctor of optometry by 6 months of age. Children at risk should be examined at 3 years of age and annually beginning at 6 years of age. All infants and children may be referred to an optometrist for a comprehensive eye and/or vision examination.
top link

Basics of Vision Screening

1. History

When screening for present or potential visual disorders, consider the following factors:

  • Family history of vision or eye problems
  • History of maternal, intrapartum, or neonatal conditions that may place the child at high risk for visual disorders (See High-Risk Children)
  • Parental concerns about a child's visual functioning
  • Worsening grades and other school difficulties
top link

2. Physical Examination

A comprehensive examination of the eye includes the lids, lashes, tear ducts, orbit, conjunctiva, sclera, cornea, iris, pupillary responsiveness, range of motion, anterior chamber, lens, vitreous, retina, and optic nerve and vessels. Gaining the cooperation of a young child with an ophthalmoscopic examination can be difficult. It may be helpful to demonstrate the examination procedure on the parent beforehand and to have the child sit on the parent's lap.top link

3. Testing Procedures

Red Reflex:

Perform this exam with an ophthalmoscope or other light source. In a darkened room, hold the light source at arm's length from the infant, and draw the infant's attention to look directly at the light. Both retinal reflexes should be red or red-orange and of equal intensity.top link

Corneal Light Reflex:

To detect strabismus, perform this test with an ophthalmoscope or other light source. Corneal light reflections should fall symmetrically on corresponding points of the patient's eyes. Improper alignment will appear as asymmetry of reflections.top link

Differential Occlusion:

Gently cover the infant's eyes, one at a time. Aversion to the occlusion is normal. This test may give a false-positive result and is generally less accurate than the corneal light reflex test for detecting strabismus.top link

Fixation:

Hold a light or a small object in front of the infant. Normal eyes will be aligned in the same direction, without deviation.top link

Cover/Uncover:

Have the child focus on a stationary target. Place a hand or cover in front of one eye, and observe the other eye. Movement of the observed eye is abnormal and demonstrates the presence of strabismus. As the covered eye is uncovered, observe it for movement. Movement is abnormal and indicates the presence of heterophoria.top link

Stereo testing:

To detect stereopsis (binocular depth perception), use a stereo testing technique, such as the Random Dot E stereogram. While wearing polarized glasses, the child views test cards that contain fields of random dots. If stereopsis is present, the child will see a form stand out from the background of the cards.top link

Visual Acuity:

Several eye charts are available to test visual acuity in children. In order of decreasing cognitive difficulty, these are: Snellen Letters, Snellen Numbers, Tumbling E, HOTV, Allen Figures, and LH (Leah Hyvarinen) Test. Use the test with the highest level of difficulty that the child is capable of performing. In general, the Snellen tests are too advanced for preschool-aged children. Test for visual acuity at 10, 15, or 20 feet using the appropriate chart. Using a distance of 10 feet for young children may result in better compliance because of closer interaction with the examiner. To ensure that a young child does not "peek" with the eye not being tested, hold the occluder for the child or use an adhesive occluder. Give a passing score for each line on which the child gives more than 50% correct responses. Recommended criteria for referral to an ophthalmologist or optometrist vary slightly. In general, refer any child with a difference between eye scores of two or more lines; children younger than age 5 years who score 20/40 or worse in either eye; and children aged 5 years or older who score 20/30 or worse in either eye.top link

4. Safety Counseling

Counsel parents and children about eye safety and the appropriate use of protective equipment. Children who participate in school shop or science labs or in certain sports (ie, racquetball, squash) should wear safety lenses and safety frames approved by the American National Standards Institute. Children with good vision in only one eye should wear safety lenses and safety frames to protect the good eye, even if they do not otherwise need to wear glasses.top link

Patient Resources


Amblyopia: Is it Affecting Your Child's Sight?;Cataracts in Children: Eye Safety and Children; Eyeglasses for Infants and Children; Home Eye Test for Strabismus. American Academy of Ophthalmology, PO Box 7424, San Francisco, CA 94120. Send a business-size, self-addressed, stamped envelop with your request.


Your Child's Eyes. American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Blvd, PO Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927; (800)433-9016. Internet address: http://www.aap.org


Answers to Your Questions About: Lazy Eye, Nearsightedness, Astigmatism, Eye Coordination, Color Deficiency, Crossed-Eyes; Signs of a Child's Vision Problems; Toys, Games and Your Child's Vision; Your Child's Eyes; Your Preschool Child's Eyes; Your School-Aged Child's Eyes. American Optometric Association, 243 N Lindbergh Blvd, St.Louis, MO 63141; (314)991-4100. Internet address: http://www.aoanet.org/
top link

Provider Resources


Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents; Bright Futures Pocket Guide; Bright Futures Anticipatory Guidance Cards. Available from the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2000 15th Street North, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22201-2617; (703)524-7802. Internet address: http://www.brightfutures.org


Policy Statement: Frequency of Ocular Examinations; National Eyecare Project (for those who do not have an eye doctor); Glaucoma 2001 Project (for people at risk for glaucoma). American Academy of Ophthalmology, PO Box 7424, San Francisco, CA 94120. Send a business-size, self-addressed, stamped envelope with your request.


Pediatric Eye and Vision Examination, Care of the Patient with Amblyopia, and other clinical practice guidelines. American Optometric Association, 243 N Lindbergh Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63141; (800)262-2210. Internet address: http://www.aoanet.org/
top link

Selected References

American Academy of Family Physicians. . Sumary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.

American Academy of Ophthalmology. . Infant and Children's Vision Screening: Policy Statement. San Francisco, Calif: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1991.

American Academy of Ophthalmology, Quality of Care Committee, Pediatric Ophthalmology Panel. . Comprehensive Pediatric Eye Evaluation. San Francisco, Calif: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1992.

American Optometric Association. . Guidelines for Preventive Eye Care. St. Louis, Mo: American Optometric Associaiton; 1993.

American Optometric Association. . Pediatric Eye and Vision Examination. St. Louis, Mo: American Optometric Association; 1994.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. . Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 1995. 96: 373-374. (PubMed)

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979. 121: 1194-1254.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Periodic health examination: 2; 1989 update. Can Med Assoc J. 1989. 141: 4-24.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Routine preschool screening for visual and hearing problems. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 27.

Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. . Well baby care in the first 2 years of life. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 24.

Gaynon MW. . Retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrician. 1990. 17: 127-133. (PubMed)

Green M, ed. . Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.

Hope C. . Random dot stereogram E in vision screening of children. Austr N Zea J Ophthalmol. 1990. 18: 319-324.

Romano PE. . Advances in vision and eye screening: screening at six months of age. Pediatrician. 1990. 17: 134-141. (PubMed)

Romano PE. . Vision/eye screening: Test twice and refer once. Pediatr Annals. 1990. 19: 359-367.

US Preventive Services Task Force. . Screening for visual impairment. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1996: chap 33.

Tables

Table 11.1. Eye and Vision Examination Recommendations for Primary Care Clinicians


Age Screening Method Indicators Requiring Further Evaluation

Newborn to
3 months old
Red reflex Abnormal or asymmetric
Corneal light reflex Asymmetric
Inspection Structural abnormality
6 months to
1 year old
Red reflex Abnormal or asymmetric
Corneal light reflex Asymmetric
Differential occlusion Failure to object equally to covering each eye
Fix and follow with each eye Failure to fix and follow
Inspection Structural abnormality
3 years old
(approximately)
Visual acuity* 20/50 or worse or difference of 2 lines between eyes
Red reflex Abnormal or asymmetric
Corneal light reflex/cover-uncover Asymmetric/ocular refixation movements
Stereoacuity** Failure to appreciate random dot or Titmus stereogram
Inspection Structural abnormality
5 years old
(approximately)
Visual acuity* 20/30 or worse
Red reflex Abnormal or asymmetric
Corneal light reflex/cover-uncover Asymmetric/ocular refixation movements
Stereoacuity** Failure to appreciate random dot or Titmus stereogram
Inspection Structural abnormality



*Allen figures, HOTV, Tumbling E, or Snellen



**Optional, sometimes advocated in lieu of visual acuity; Random Dot E game (RDE), Titmus stereograms, Randot stereograms



From: American Academy of Ophthalmology, Quality of Care Committee, Pediatric Ophthalmology Panel. Comprehensive Pediatric Eye Evaluation. San Francisco, Calif. American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1992. Reproduced by permission of the publisher; copyright 1992.



Copyright and Disclaimer