U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning
and Evaluation
March 2008
About This Research Brief This Research Brief presents key findings from an analysis of the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) and the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) to provide information about the developmental status and early intervention service needs of children under age three who are substantiated for maltreatment. The analysis described here was conducted by a team of researchers coordinated by the Institute for Social and Economic Development (ISED) under contract to ASPE. |
This Research Brief is available on the Internet at:
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/devneeds/rb.htm
Printer Friendly Version in PDF Format (6 pages)
The full report is available at:
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/devneeds/index.htm
Children younger than three years of age are the most likely of all children to become involved with Child Welfare Services.(1) Among young children most at risk of developmental problems are those who experience child neglect and abuse. A major opportunity to minimize or avoid developmental problems is missed when maltreated children do not receive services that could ameliorate these negative experiences.
In 2003, the Federal government amended the Child Abuse and Prevention Treatment Act (CAPTA) to require that infants and toddlers who are substantiated for child maltreatment be referred to early intervention services provided under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Little is known about the true extent of developmental problems of children substantiated for abuse or neglect, and those children subsequently removed from parental custody and placed in an alternative living environment. This dearth of information is in part due to the inconsistencies in child welfare practice across jurisdictions; variability in state and jurisdictional eligibility criteria for infants and toddlers for Part C services (Shackelford, 2006); differential policies, procedures, and practice competencies of public child welfare workers; and the differential availability of resources to serve children once identified. Further complicating the issue is the requirement under Part C that states must provide services to children who meet the state criterion for eligibility, but states may also choose to serve children who are "at risk of having substantial developmental delays if early intervention services are not provided." Only five states (CA, HI, MA, NM, & WV) currently serve such at risk children.
National estimates of the extent and type of need for early intervention services for maltreated infants and toddlers are lacking. The purpose of this study is to provide such information. The overarching question guiding our analysis is: What are the developmental problems among children receiving Child Welfare Services that suggest a need for Part C early intervention services?
This Research Brief presents key findings from an analysis of the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) and the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) to provide information about the developmental status and early intervention service needs of children under age three who are substantiated for maltreatment. In addition to these two data sources, a literature review was conducted and discussions were held with Part C and Child Welfare Service experts.
This study produced nine key findings that are grouped into four areas environmental and biomedical risks that may affect development, developmental outcomes, service receipt, and considerations for successful interventions.
Environmental risk refers to children whose caregiving circumstances place them at greater risk for poorer developmental outcomes. Biomedical risk refers to children with medical or other biologically-based problems associated with poorer developmental outcomes.
100% Child Maltreatment 58% Minority Status 48% Single Caregiver 46% Poverty 40% Domestic Violence 39% Caregiver Substance Abuse 30% Caregiver Mental Health Problem 29% Low Caregiver Education 22% Biomedical Risk Condition 19% Teen-aged Caregiver 14% 4 or More Children in Home Source: NSCAW. |
Individually any of these factors may not be predictive of poor developmental outcomes, but the exposure to multiple risk factors increases the likelihood. It has been demonstrated that a single risk factor such as poverty (Duncan, Brooks-Gunn, Klebanov, 1994) or maternal mental health (Laucht, Esser, & Schmidt, 2001) can be associated with poorer developmental outcomes for infants and toddlers. The least positive developmental outcomes are, however, associated with the cumulative effect of a range of multiple risk factors (Rutter, 1979; Sameroff, Seifer, Zax, & Barocas, 1987; Sameroff, 1998).
Information was available to compare some of the demographic characteristics of substantiated infants and toddlers with children the same age entering Part C, and those in the general population (see Exhibit 2).
Risk Factor | Substantiated Maltreatment (NSCAW) 1999-2000 |
Part C (NEILS) 1997-1998 |
General Population (NHES) 1999 |
---|---|---|---|
Minority status | 58% | 47% | 39% |
Single caregiver | 48% | 15% | 15% |
Poverty | 46% | 32% | 24% |
Less than high school education | 29% | 16% | 17% |
Four or more children in the home | 14% | 8% | 8% |
Source: NSCAW; Hebbeler et al., 2003 for NEILS & National Household Education Survey (NHES). |
Study findings support reason to be concerned about the developmental status of maltreated children regardless of substantiation status. Likewise, problems in the caregiving relationship with the potential to affect developmental outcomes are also indicated in the increased rate of behavioral problems reported by caregivers of young maltreated children.
In the NSCAW we examined the proportion of substantiated infants and toddlers reported to have an Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP), a formal document indicating eligibility for Part C services and an agreement between service providers and caregivers regarding the type and amount of services to be provided.
Receipt of Child Welfare Services suggests that as children get older there may be less perceived need for parent training. The proportion of families reported to receive family counseling also declines in this time period. Receipt of services appears to be related temporally to the time of initial investigation. This reduction in services may be associated with the effectiveness of services in reducing risk factors, particularly those associated with conditions in the home directly associated with substantiation of maltreatment. Alternatively, this reduction may indicate a declining ability of services to engage families.
Discussions with Part C and Child Welfare Service experts revealed concerns that Part C providers may be unprepared to provide effective services to maltreated children and their families. Successful implementation of CAPTA may require structured collaboration between Child Welfare and Part C service providers.
CAPTA and IDEA recognize that child maltreatment signals a substantial risk to the development of children. Their requirements call for action to address the developmental problems of children substantiated for maltreatment. Together, these Acts generate a clear expectation for efforts to mitigate the developmental harms of maltreatment.
This study confirms that the level of risk for developmental delay is high for maltreated children and that it remains high, years after the initial maltreatment. The rates of developmental and behavioral problems are well above those in the general population and the rates of environmental risk and serious problems within the dyadic relationship between child and caregiver are above those of children typically encountered by Part C service providers.
The implementation of successful services for maltreated infants is clearly complicated and, according to experts, unfulfilled. Both of these programs-Child Welfare Services and Part C Services-must now meet the requirements of their governing legislation, with no explicit authorization of funds to support implementation. The findings of this report call for further review of effective strategies and consideration of new efforts, and related research, to implement these innovative policies. This research should involve rigorously conducted evaluations of best practice models so that the knowledge gained from these evaluations can add measurably to the information provided by the surveys upon which this study was based.
CAPTA (2003). Available at http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb/laws_policies/policy/im/im0304a.pdf.
Drake, B. (1995). Associations between reporter type and assessment outcomes in child protective services referrals. Children and Youth Services Review, 17(4), 503-522.
Drake, B., Jonson-Reid, M., Way, I., & Chung, S. (2003). Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment, 8, 248-260.
Duncan, G., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Development, 65, 296-318.
Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., Mallik, S., Scarborough, A., & Simeonsson, R. (2003). Demographic characteristics of children and families entering early intervention. [NEILS Data Report No. 3]. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Lau, A. S., Valeri, S. M., McCarty, C. A., & Weisz, J. R. (2006). Abusive parents' reports of child behavior problems: Relationship to observed parent-child interactions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(6), 639-655.
Laucht, M., Esser, G., & Schmidt, M. H. (2001). Differential development of infants at risk for psychopathology: the moderating role of early maternal responsivity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 292-300.
NSCAW Research Group. (2002). Methodological lessons from the national survey of child and adolescent wellbeing: The first three years of the USA's first national probability study of children and families investigated for abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(6/7), 513-541.
Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children's responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf, (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology. III. Social competence in children (pp.49-74). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Sameroff, A. J. (1998). Environmental risk factors in infancy. Pediatrics, 102 (5), 1287-1292.
Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Zax, M., & Barocas, R. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year old children: Social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343-350.
Shackelford, J. (2006). State and jurisdictional eligibility definitions for infants and toddlers with disabilities under IDEA. (NECTAC Notes, No. 21). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
Wulczyn, F., Barth, R.P., Yuan, Y.Y., Jones-Harden, B., & Landsverk, J. (2005). Evidence for child welfare policy reform. New York: Transaction De Gruyter.
1. Wulczyn, F., Barth, R.P., Yuan, Y.Y., Jones-Harden, B., & Landsverk, J. (2005). Evidence for child welfare policy reform. New York: Transaction De Gruyter.
2. Established risk conditions include, but are not limited to, chromosomal abnormalities; genetic or congenital disorders; severe sensory impairments, including hearing and vision; inborn errors of metabolism; disorders reflecting disturbance of the development of the nervous system; congenital infections; disorders secondary to exposure to toxic substances, including fetal alcohol syndrome; and severe attachment disorders.
ISED coordinated a team of researchers to conduct this study from:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
Office of Human Services Policy
US Department of Health and Human Services
Washington, DC 20201
Melissa Pardue
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Services Policy
To obtain a printed copy of this report, send the title and your mailing information to:
Human Services Policy, Room 404EFax: (202) 690-6562
You may also print the PDF version (6 pages). This file is for the convenience of our visitors and is not ADA compliant; for the ADA compliant version use the HTML version above.
Top of Page | Contents
Main Page of Report | Contents
of Report
Home Pages:
Human Services Policy
(HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS)
Last updated: 03/18/08