/* FILE ARCHIVED ON 6:33:55 Sep 16, 2008 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE AN OPENWAYBACK INSTANCE ON 6:03:53 Sep 10, 2024. JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY OPENWAYBACK, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE. ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C. SECTION 108(a)(3)). */
|
A Toolkit
for Evaluating Public R&D Investment PART III: AN EMERGING BODY OF KNOWLEDGEThe earlier parts of this report have described the political setting within which ATP has operated, specific questions posed by administration and Congressional officials about ATP’s impacts, the general evaluative program, and the models and methods used to assess ATP. This part looks at findings. Essentially, five central questions have shaped ATP’s evaluation agenda over its first decade. These questions have naturally arisen from the political economy of ATP’s genesis as reflected in its authorizing legislation. They are:
Return to Table of Contents or go to Chapter 9: A Crosscutting Look at Study Findings. Date created: July 13,
2004 |
ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov. NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department |