FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2000-56 SEC Releases Agenda for Investment Advisers Roundtable Washington, DC, May 1, 2000 -- The Securities and Exchange Commission today released the agenda for the Roundtable on Investment Adviser Regulatory Issues that it will host at its headquarters in Washington, DC on May 23, 2000, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The Roundtable will explore several significant regulatory issues that the Commission plans to address in the next year. Seating is available to all members of the public on a first- come, first-serve basis. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on any of the topics to be discussed at the Roundtable. Comments must be received on or before May 12, 2000, and should be submitted in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549-0609. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following E-mail address: rule-comments@sec.gov. All submissions should refer to File No. 4-433; this File number should be included on the subject line if E-mail is used. Submissions will be available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Electronic submissions also will be posted on the Commission's Internet web site (http://www.sec.gov). For further information, contact Cynthia M. Fornelli, Senior Adviser to the Director, Division of Investment Management, (202) 942-0720, or J. David Fielder, Adviser to the Director, Division of Investment Management, (202) 942-0530, fielderd@sec.gov, at Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549-0506. Agenda for the SEC Roundtable on Investment Adviser Regulatory Issues May 23, 2000 I. Introduction II. Investment Advisers In Today's Competitive Markets / Modernization of Adviser Regulation A. Investment Advisers and Broker Dealers - Are the Lines Blurring? (Proposed rule 202(a)(11)-1: Deeming certain broker-dealers not to be investment advisers) B. Should the other statutory exceptions from the definition of "investment adviser" be revisited? C. Effectiveness of bifurcated regulatory regime under NSMIA D. Review of the disclosure model E. Is there a need for a self-regulatory organization? III. Trading Practices A. Use of soft dollars B. Obligation to seek best execution C. Allocation of investment opportunities D. Personal trading (including whether there should there be a code of ethics requirement) E. Custody F. Trading error correction IV. Conflicts of Interest A. Conflicts faced by advisers B. Proposed rule 206(4)-5: pay to play C. Possible rule modifying Section 206(3)'s restrictions on principal trading D. Supervision V. Advertising and Performance Reporting A. Use of investment performance in advertising B. Revisions to the Advisers Act advertising rules C. Standardization of performance reporting VI. Technology and Investment Adviser Regulation A. Implications of Internet/Technology for Advisers B. Revisions to Form ADV C. The IARD: new electronic filing system D. Modifying the rules regarding maintenance of investment adviser books and records # # #