ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Different Techniques for Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Patients With Difficult Airway

This study has been completed.

Sponsored by: Medical University Innsbruck
Information provided by: Medical University Innsbruck
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00500916
  Purpose

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve the seal and a drain tube to prevent aspiration and gastric insufflation. The manufacturer recommends inserting the PLMA using digital manipulation, like the Classic LMA, or with an introducer tool (IT), like the Intubating LMA. The mean (range) frequency of insertion success at the first attempt for these techniques is 84% (81-100) and 95% (90-100) respectively, with the main causes of insertion difficulty being impaction at the back of the mouth and failure of the distal cuff to reach the hypopharynx. Howarth et al described an insertion technique which overcomes these difficulties by using a gum elastic bougie (GEB) placed in the esophagus to guide the PLMA around the back of the mouth and into its correct position in the hypopharynx. Howarth et al reported no failed uses from 100 consecutive insertions. In the following study, we test the hypothesis that GEB-guided insertion is more frequently successful than the digital and IT techniques in patients with difficult airway.


Condition Intervention
Difficult Airway
Ventilation
Device: ProSeal LMA

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Interventional
Study Design:   Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title:   Different Techniques for Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Patients With Difficult Airway

Further study details as provided by Medical University Innsbruck:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Insertion success rate [ Time Frame: 5 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Time to successful insertion [ Time Frame: 5 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment:   0
Study Start Date:   March 2007
Study Completion Date:   December 2007

Intervention Details:
    Device: ProSeal LMA
    GEB vs digital vs introducer tool
  Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:   19 Years to 70 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patient
  • 19-70 yr
  • Body mass index <35 kg/m2
  • Difficult airway

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 19 yr
  • Body mass index >35 kg/m2
  • Risk of aspiration
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00500916

Locations
Austria
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care    
      Innsbruck, Austria, 6020

Sponsors and Collaborators
Medical University Innsbruck

Investigators
Principal Investigator:     Christian Keller, MD, M.Sc.     Dept of Anesthesia and Intensive Care    
Principal Investigator:     Christian Keller, MD, M.Sc.     Dept of Anesthesia and Intensive Care    
  More Information


Publications indexed to this study:

Responsible Party:   Christian Keller MD, M.Sc. ( Medical University Innsbruck )
Study ID Numbers:   UN2532
First Received:   July 11, 2007
Last Updated:   December 3, 2007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00500916
Health Authority:   Austria: Federal Ministry for Health and Women

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 04, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers