FOR YOUR INFORMATION............October 25, 1990 On Tuesday, Oct. 23, Ronald B. Rowe, Director for Litigation, of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, presented a statement before a joint subcommittee of the Virginia Senate and House of Delegates, on legislation affecting gasoline distribution markets in Virginia. The statement was presented at the request of Virginia Delegate Alan A. Diamonstein, Chairman of the Joint Subcommittee Studying Divorcement. The statement reaffirmed a previous staff comment that opposed divorcement legislation limiting ownership of retail gasoline stations by refiners as "anticompetitive and harmful" to consumers: "The argument that refiner-owned and operated retail service stations are part of a collusive scheme to harm franchised dealers has no factual support in the record before this subcommittee." The statement noted that Virginia's neighbor, Maryland, has had a divorcement law since 1973, and cited a recent report by the Maryland State Department of Fiscal Services for the General Assembly of Maryland, that concluded that "the Maryland divorcement law has resulted in higher gasoline prices for consumers." In concluding the statement, Rowe said, "there appears to be no factual support for divorcement legislation, but there are compelling reasons to believe that such legislation would be harmful to competition and to Virginia consumers and visitors." The statement and comment represent the views of Mr. Rowe and the staff of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any individual Commissioner. Copies of the statement and earlier comment are available from the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Rm. 130, 6th St. and Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-326-2222; TTY 202-326-2502. # # # MEDIA CONTACT: Howard Shapiro, Office of Public Affairs, 202-326-2176 STAFF CONTACT: Ronald B. Rowe, Bureau of Competition, 202-326-2610 (Vagasdiv)